Abstract
The aim of the present study is to examine what rationality conditions are ignored and why it happens when users have more than one dimension in conflict, such as perceived security and usability in the online banking use experience. In a controlled experiment, thirty subjects used two different online banking authentication interfaces: a fingerprint interface and a normal four-step interface, in a reverse order. The empirical findings revealed that a different combination of rationality conditions was employed based on a change from effortless interaction (e.g., the fingerprint) to effortful interaction (e.g., the four-step logon system) or vice versa. We also provided some design implications for HCI practitioners, and proposed a new approach to evaluate user experiences as there are benefits and drawbacks mixed in user interface design.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Davinson, N., Sillence, E.: It won’t happen to me: promoting secure behavior among Internet users. Computers in Human Behavior 26(6), 1739–1747 (2010)
Gilovich, T., Griffin, D.W., Kahneman, D.: Heuristics and Biases: The psychology of intuitive. Cambridge University Press (2002)
Gunson, N., Marshall, D., Morton, H., Jack, M.: User perceptions of security and usability of single-factor and two-factor authentication in automated telephone banking. Computers & Security 30(4), 208–220 (2011)
Herley, C.: So Long, And No Thanks for the Externalities: The Rational Rejection of Security Advice by Users. In: Proc. New Security Paradigms Workshop (2009)
Kahneman, D., Tversky, A.: Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2), 263–291 (1979)
Mannan, M., Oorschot, P.C.: Security and usability: the gap in real-world online banking. In: Proc. New Security Paradigms Workshop, pp. 1–14 (2007)
Tractinsky, N., Katz, A.S., Ikar, D.: What is beautiful is usable. Interacting with Computers 13, 127–145 (2000)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Shin, D., Ryu, H., Kim, N., Kim, J. (2013). Modeling of a Human Decision-Making Process with Prospect Theory. In: Rau, P.L.P. (eds) Cross-Cultural Design. Methods, Practice, and Case Studies. CCD 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8023. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39143-9_51
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39143-9_51
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39142-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39143-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)