[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

Leveraging Reuse-Related Maturity Issues for Achieving Higher Maturity and Capability Levels

  • Conference paper
Safe and Secure Software Reuse (ICSR 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 7925))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1358 Accesses

Abstract

During the past 20 years Maturity & Capability Models (MCMs) become a buzzword in the ICT world. Since the initial Crosby’s idea in 1979, plenty of models have been created in the Software & Systems Engineering domains, addressing various perspectives. By analyzing the content of the Process Reference Models (PRM) in many of them, it can be noticed that reuse-related issues have unfortunately often little importance in the appraisals of the capabilities of software organizations while in practice they are considered as significant contributors in traditional process and organizational performance appraisals. While MCMs represent a good mean for assessing the status of a set of processes, integrating two or more models with a common area of focus can offer more information and value for an organization. The aim of this paper is to present some information about Reuse best practices and models, keep the best components from each model and – using the LEGO (Living EnGineering prOcess) approach to process improvement - merge those best practices from several types of maturity models into an organizational Business Process Model (BPM) in order to achieve in an easier and faster way higher organizational maturity and capability levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 35.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 44.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Constant, D.: Re: CMMI Representations, which one is the better? Yahoo SPI Mailing List (February 10, 2004), http://goo.gl/5uhAP

  2. Crosby, P.B.: Quality is free. McGraw-Hill (1979) ISBN 0-451-62585-411

    Google Scholar 

  3. CMMI Product Team, CMMI for Development, Version 1.3, CMMI-DEV v1.3, Continuous Representation, CMU/SEI-2010-TR-033. Technical Report, Software Engineering Institute (November 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Curtis, B., Hefley, W., Miller, S.: People Capability Maturity Model (P-CMM) Version 2.0. 2/ed, CMU/SEI-2009-TR-003, Maturity Model, Software Engineering Institute (July 2009), http://goo.gl/2p0M8

  5. SEI, Standard CMMI Appraisal Method for Process Improvement (SCAMPI), version 1.3: Method Definition Document, Software Engineering Institute, Handbook, CMU/SEI-2011-HB-001 (March 2011), http://goo.gl/18IAX

  6. ISO/IEC, IS 15504-2: Information technology – Process assessment – Part 2: Performing an assessment (October 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. ISO/IEC, IS 15504-5: Information technology – Process Assessment – Part 5: An exemplar Process Assessment Model (March 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Copeland, L.: The Maturity Maturity Model (M3). Guidelines for Improving the Maturity Process, StickyMinds (September 2003), http://goo.gl/MgUS2

  9. Abran, A., Moore, J.W., Bourque, P., Dupuis, R., Tripp, L.T.: Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge (SWEBOK) 2004 Version. IEEE (2004), http://goo.gl/OhLDp

  10. ISO/IEC, IS 12207: Information technology – Software Life Cycle processes (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ibrahim, L., Bradford, B., Cole, D., LaBruyere, L., Leinneweber, H., Piszczech, D., Reed, N., Rymond, M., Smith, D., Virga, M., Wells, C.: The Federal Aviation Administration Integrated Capability Maturity Model, (FAA-iCMM), Version 2.0. An Integrated Capability Maturity Model for Enterprise-wide Improvement, FAA (September 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Burnstein, I., Homyen, A., Grom, R., Carlson, C.R.: A Model to Assess Testing Process Maturity, Crosstalk. The Journal of Defense Software Engineering, 26–30 (November 1998), http://goo.gl/xg8zF

  13. Koomen, T., Pol, M.: Test Process Improvement: a Practical Step-by-Step Guide to Structured Testing. Addison-Wesley (1999) ISBN 0-201-59624-5

    Google Scholar 

  14. OGC, P3M3: Portfolio, Programme & Project Management Maturity Model, Version 1.0, Office of Government Commerce (February 2006), http://goo.gl/tTbq9

  15. PMI, Organizational Project Management Maturity Model (OPM3), Knowledge Foundation, Project Management Institute, 2nd edn. (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. CMMI Product Team, CMMI for Service, Version 1.3, CMMI-SVC v1.3, CMU/SEI-2010-TR-034. Technical Report, Software Engineering Institute (November 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. CMMI Product Team, CMMI for Acquisition, Version 1.3, CMMI-ACQ v1.3, CMU/SEI-2010-TR-032, Technical Report, Software Engineering Institute (November 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cardoso Garcia, V., Lucredio, D., Alvaro, A., Santana de Almeida, E.: Towards a Maturity Model for a Reuse Incremental Adoption. In: SBCARS 2007, Brazilian Symposium on Software Components, Architectures and Reuse, http://goo.gl/DVHP9

  19. Buglione, L.: Leveraging people-related maturity issues for achieving Higher Maturity & Capability Levels. In: Proceedings of IWSM/MENSURA 2009, Amsterdam, Netherlands, November 4-6, pp. 35–47 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Buglione, L.: Maturity Models: modelli esclusivi o integrabili?, Qualità On-Line, Rivista dell’AICQ (Novembre 2007), http://goo.gl/5xvKQ

  21. Jasmine, K.S., Vasanth, R.: A New Capability Maturity Model For Reuse Based Software Development process. IACSIT International Journal of Engineering and Technology 2(1) (February 2010), http://goo.gl/1KE18

  22. Spoelstra, W.: Reusing software assets in agile development organizations - a management tool: a case at a medium sized software development organization. University of Twente, Netherlands. Thesis (2010), http://essay.utwente.nl/59917/

  23. Sindre, G., Conradi, R., Karlsson, E.A.: The REBOOT Approach to Software Reuse, Journal of Systems & Software (JSS). Special Issue on Software Reuse 30(3), 201–212 (1995), http://goo.gl/Sa2Eo

    Google Scholar 

  24. Frakes, W., Terry, C.: Software Reuse: Metrics and Models. ACM Computing Surveys 28(2) (June 1996), http://goo.gl/6mBR4

  25. Reuse Research Center, Software Reuse Fundamentals, Presentation, http://goo.gl/OYWHt

  26. Koltun, P., Hudson, A.: A Reuse Maturity Model. In: WISR4 4th Workshop on Institutionalizing Software Reuse, Center for Innovative Technology, Reston, Virginia, USA (November 1991)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lloréns, J., Fuentes, J.M., Prieto-Diaz, R., Astudillo, H.: Incremental Software Reuse. In: Morisio, M. (ed.) ICSR 2006. LNCS, vol. 4039, pp. 386–389. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Basset, P.G.: The Theory and Practice of Adaptive Reuse. In: Symposium on Software Reusability (SSR 1997). ACM, Boston (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Davis, T.: The reuse capability model: a basis for improving an organization’s reuse capability. In: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Software Reusability, Herndon, VA (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Griss, M.L.: CMM as a Framework for Adopting Systematic Reuse. Object Magazine, 60–62, 69 (1998), http://goo.gl/k0iXI

  31. Mandava Kranthi, K., Konda, B.M., Thammi Reddy, K., Ravi Kiran, B., Vindhya, A.: A Systematic Mapping Study on Value of Reuse. International Journal of Computer Applications (0975 – 8887) 34(4), 37–44 (2011), http://goo.gl/3oEpm

    Google Scholar 

  32. GUFPI-ISMA, Linee Guida per l’uso Contrattuale dei Function Point, Documento Tecnico 2006-01, Gruppo Utenti Function Point Italia – Italian Software Metrics Association (June 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Buglione, L., Gresse von Wangenheim, C., Hauck, J.C.R., McCaffery, F.: The LEGO Maturity & Capability Model Approach. In: Proceedings of the 5th World Congress on Software Quality, Shanghai, China (October 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Basili, V.R., Caldiera, G., Rombach, H.D.: The Experience Factory. In: Marciniak, J.J. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Software Engineering, vol. 1, pp. 469–476. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (1994), http://goo.gl/DZIlU

  35. Lim, W.C.: Managing Software Reuse, 1st edn. Prentice-Hall, ISBN 9780135523735

    Google Scholar 

  36. Mutafeljia, B., Stromberg, H.: Process Improvement with CMMI v1.2 and ISO Standards. Auerback Publications (2008), http://goo.gl/BFUqq

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Buglione, L., Lami, G., von Wangenheim, C.G., Caffery, F.M., Hauck, J.C.R. (2013). Leveraging Reuse-Related Maturity Issues for Achieving Higher Maturity and Capability Levels. In: Favaro, J., Morisio, M. (eds) Safe and Secure Software Reuse. ICSR 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7925. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38977-1_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38977-1_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-38976-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-38977-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics