Towards an Engineering-Based Research Approach for Enterprise Architecture: Lessons Learned from Normalized Systems Theory

1. Henderson, J.C., Venkatraman, N.: Strategic alignment: leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Syst. J. 32, 4–16 (1993)

   Article  Google Scholar 

2. Anderson, J.C., Narks, J.A.: Capturing the value of supplementary services. Harvard Business Review 73(1), 75–83 (1995)

   Google Scholar 

3. Lehman, M.: Programs, life cycles, and laws of software evolution. Proceedings of the IEEE 68, 1060–1076 (1980)

   Article  Google Scholar 

4. Eisenhardt, K.M., Martin, J.A.: Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal 21(10/11), 1105–1121 (2000)

   Article  Google Scholar 

5. Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., Shuen, A.: Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal 18(7), 509–533 (1997)

   Article  Google Scholar 

6. Maier, M.W., Emery, D., Hilliard, R.: Ansi/ieee 1471 and systems engineering. Systems Engineering 7(3), 257–270 (2004)

   Article  Google Scholar 

7. Sowa, J.F., Zachman, J.A.: Extending and formalizing the framework for information systems architecture. IBM Systems Journal 31(3), 590–616 (1992)

   Article  Google Scholar 

8. Bernus, P., Nemes, L., Smidth, G.: Handbook on Enterprise Architecture. In: International Handbooks on Information Systems. Springer (2003)

   Google Scholar 

9. Martin, R., Robertson, E.: A comparison of frameworks for enterprise architecture modeling. In: Song, I.-Y., Liddle, S.W., Ling, T.-W., Scheuermann, P. (eds.) ER 2003. LNCS, vol. 2813, pp. 562–564. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

   Chapter  Google Scholar 

10. Ross, J.W., Weill, P., Robertson, D.C.: Enterprise Architecture as Strategy – Creating a Foundation for Business Execution. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (2006)

    Google Scholar 

11. Zarvic, N., Wieringa, R.J.: An integrated enterprise architecture framework for business-it alignment. In: Latour, T., Petit, M. (eds.) Proceedings of Workshops and Doctoral Consortium of the 18th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE 2006), pp. 262–270. Namur University Press, Luxembourg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

12. The Open Group: The open group architecture framework (togaf) version 9 (2009), http://www.opengroup.org/togaf/

13. Korhonen, J.J., Hiekkanen, K., Lähteenmäki, J.: Ea and it governance — a systemic approach. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Management, Leadership and Governance (ECMLG) (2009)

    Google Scholar 

14. Lawrence, P.R., Lorsch, J.W.: Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly 12(1), 1–47 (1967)

    Article  Google Scholar 

15. Hicks, H.G., Gullet, C.R.: Organizations: Theory and Behaviors. McGraw-Hill, New York (1975)

    Google Scholar 

16. Gortner, H., Mahler, J., Nicholson, J.: Organization Theory: A Public Perspective. Dorsey Press (1987)

    Google Scholar 

17. Gregor, S., Hart, D., Martin, N.: Enterprise architectures: enablers of business strategy and is/it alignment in government. Information Technology & People 20(2), 96–120 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

18. Schöenherr, M.: Towards a common terminology in the discipline of enterprise architecture. In: Feuerlicht, G., Lamersdorf, W. (eds.) ICSOC 2008. LNCS, vol. 5472, pp. 400–413. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

19. Wegmann, A.: The systemic enterprise architecture methodology (seam) - business and it alignment for competitveness. In: International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems 2003 (ICEIS 2003), pp. 483–490 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

20. Op ’t Land, M., Proper, E., Waage, M., Cloo, J., Steghuis, C.: Enterprise Architecture: Creating Value by Informed Governance, 1st edn. The Enterprise Engineering Series. Springer (December 2008)

    Google Scholar 

21. Zachman, J.A.: A framework for information systems architecture. IBM Systems Journal 26(3), 276–292 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

22. Schekkerman, J.: Trends in enterprise architecture: How are organizations progressing? Technical report, Institute For Enterprise Architecture Developments (2005)

    Google Scholar 

23. Fatolahi, A., Shams, F.: An investigation into applying uml to the zachman framework. Information Systems Frontiers 8(2), 133–143 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

24. Council, C.: A practical guide to federal enterprise architecture (2001)

    Google Scholar 

25. Pereira, C.M., Sousa, P.: A method to define an enterprise architecture using the zachman framework. In: SAC 2004: Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 1366–1371. ACM, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

26. Buckl, S., Ernst, A.M., Matthes, F., Ramacher, R., Schweda, C.M.: Using enterprise architecture management patterns to complement togaf. In: IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference, pp. 34–41. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

27. Mannaert, H., Verelst, J.: Normalized Systems—Re-creating Information Technology Based on Laws for Software Evolvability, Koppa, Kermt, Belgium (2009)

    Google Scholar 

28. Mannaert, H., Verelst, J., Ven, K.: The transformation of requirements into software primitives: Studying evolvability based on systems theoretic stability. Science of Computer Programming 76(12), 1210–1222 (2011)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

29. Mannaert, H., Verelst, J., Ven, K.: Towards evolvable software architectures based on systems theoretic stability. Software: Practice and Experience 42(1), 89–116 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

30. Van Nuffel, D.: Towards Designing Modular and Evolvable Business Processes. PhD thesis, University of Antwerp (2011)

    Google Scholar 

31. Huysmans, P.: On the Feasibility of Normalized Enterprises: Applying Normalized Systems Theory to the High-Level Design of Enterprises. PhD thesis, University of Antwerp (2011)

    Google Scholar 

32. Baldwin, C.Y., Clark, K.B.: Design Rules. The Power of Modularity, vol. 1. MIT Press Books. The MIT Press (January 2000)

    Google Scholar 

33. Richardson, G.L., Jackson, B.M., Dickson, G.W.: A principles-based enterprise architecture: lessons from texaco and star enterprise. MIS Quarterly 14(4), 385–403 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

34. Lindstrom, A.: On the syntax and semantics of architectural principles. In: Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2006), vol. 8, p. 178b (2006)

    Google Scholar 

35. Weinberg, G.M.: An Introduction to General Systems Thinking. Wiley-Interscience (1975)

    Google Scholar 

36. Bertalanffy, L.V.: General Systems Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications. George Braziller, New York (1968)

    Google Scholar 

37. Bunge, M.: Treatise on Basic Philosophy. Ontology II: A World of Systems, vol. 4. Reidel, Boston (1979)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

38. Gero, J.S., Kannengiesser, U.: The situated function-behaviour-structure framework. Design Studies 25(4), 373–391 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

39. Sutcliffe, A.G., Maiden, N.A.M.: Domain modeling for reuse. In: Frakes, W.B. (ed.) Third International Conference on Software Reuse, pp. 169–177. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1994)

    Google Scholar 

40. Smith, H.E.: Modularity in contracts: Boilerplate and information flow. American Law & Economics Association Annual Meetings Paper 46 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

41. Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 3rd edn. Sage Publications, Newbury Park (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references