A Model of Word Similarity Based on Structural Alignment of Subject-Verb-Object Triples

1. Burek, G., Pietsch, C., De Roeck, A.: SVO triple based latent semantic analysis for recognising textual entailment. In: Proceedings of the ACK-PASCAL Workshop on Textual Entailment and Paraphrasing, WTEP (2007)

   Google Scholar 

2. Choi, F.Y.Y., Wiemer-Hastings, P., Moore, J.: Latent semantic analysis for text segmentation. In: Proceedings of EMNLP, pp. 109–117 (2001)

   Google Scholar 

3. Gentner, D.: Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science 7 (1983)

   Google Scholar 

4. Gentner, D., Markman, A.B.: Structural alignment in comparison: No difference without similarity. Psychological Science 5(3), 152–158 (1994)

   Article  Google Scholar 

5. Gentner, D., Markman, A.B.: Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. American Psychologist 52(1), 45 (1997)

   Article  Google Scholar 

6. Heylen, K., Peirsman, Y., Geeraerts, D.: Automatic synonymy extraction. In: A Comparison of Syntactic Context Models. LOT Computational Linguistics in the Netherlands, pp. 101–116 (2008)

   Google Scholar 

7. Kilgarriff, A., Rychly, P., Smrz, P., Tugwell, D.: The sketch engine. In: Proceedings of EURALEX (2004)

   Google Scholar 

8. Landauer, T.K., Dutnais, S.T.: A solution to plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 211–240 (1997)

   Google Scholar 

9. Lin, D.: Automatic retrieval and clustering of similar words. In: COLING-ACL, pp. 768–774 (1998)

   Google Scholar 

10. Lund, K., Burgess, C.: Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 28(5), 203–208 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

11. Markman, A.B., Gentner, D.: Splitting the differences: A structural alignment view of similarity. Journal of Memory and Language 32, 517–517 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

12. Markman, A.B., Gentner, D.: Commonalities and differences in similarity comparisons. Memory & Cognition 24(2), 235–249 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

13. McCarthy, D., Koeling, R., Weeds, J., Carroll, J.A.: Finding predominant word senses in untagged text. In: ACL, pp. 279–286 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

14. McDonald, S., Brew, C.: A distributional model of semantic context effects in lexical processing. In: Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, p. 17. Association for Computational Linguistics (2004)

    Google Scholar 

15. Padó, S., Lapata, M.: Dependency-based construction of semantic space models. Computational Linguistics 33(2), 161–199 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

16. Salton, G., McGill, M.: Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval. McGraw-Hill Book Company (1984)

    Google Scholar 

17. Turney, P.D., Pantel, P.: From frequency to meaning: Vector space models of semantics. J. Artif. Intell. Res. (JAIR) 37, 141–188 (2010)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

18. Widdows, D.: Unsupervised methods for developing taxonomies by combining syntactic and statistical information. In: Proceedings of the 2003 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Human Language Technology, vol. 1, pp. 197–204. Association for Computational Linguistics (2003)

    Google Scholar 

19. Wu, Z., Palmer, M.: Verb semantics and lexical selection. In: 32nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (1994)

    Google Scholar 

Download references