[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

Moving Up and Down in the Generic Multiverse

  • Conference paper
Logic and Its Applications (ICLA 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 7750))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We investigate the modal logic of the generic multiverse which is a bimodal logic with operators corresponding to the relations “is a forcing extension of” and “is a ground model of”. The fragment of the first relation is the modal logic of forcing and was studied by the authors in earlier work. The fragment of the second relation is the modal logic of grounds and will be studied here for the first time. In addition, we discuss which combinations of modal logics are possible for the two fragments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 31.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 39.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Esakia, L., Löwe, B.: Fatal Heyting algebras and forcing persistent sentences. Studia Logica 100(1-2), 163–173 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Friedman, S., Fuchino, S., Sakai, H.: On the set-generic multiverse (submitted, 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fuchs, G.: Closed maximality principles: implications, separations and combinations. Journal of Symbolic Logic 73(1), 276–308 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Fuchs, G.: Combined maximality principles up to large cardinals. Journal of Symbolic Logic 74(3), 1015–1046 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Fuchs, G., Hamkins, J.D., Reitz, J.: Set-theoretic geology (submitted, 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hamkins, J.D.: A simple maximality principle. Journal of Symbolic Logic 68(2), 527–550 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Hamkins, J.D.: The Ground Axiom. Oberwolfach Reports 2(4), 3160–3162 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hamkins, J.D.: Some Second Order Set Theory. In: Ramanujam, R., Sarukkai, S. (eds.) ICLA 2009. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5378, pp. 36–50. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Hamkins, J.D.: The set-theoretic multiverse. Review of Symbolic Logic 5, 416–449 (2012), doi:10.1017/S1755020311000359

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Hamkins, J.D., Leibman, G., Löwe, B.: Structural connections between a forcing class and its modal logic (submitted, 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hamkins, J.D., Löwe, B.: The modal logic of forcing. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 360(4), 1793–1817 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Hamkins, J.D., Woodin, W.H.: The necessary maximality principle for c.c.c. forcing is equiconsistent with a weakly compact cardinal. Mathematical Logic Quarterly 51(5), 493–498 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Jech, T.: Set Theory, 3rd edn. Springer Monographs in Mathematics. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Laver, R.: Certain very large cardinals are not created in small forcing extensions. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 149(1-3), 1–6 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Leibman, G.: Consistency strengths of modified maximality principles. PhD thesis, City University of New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Leibman, G.: The consistency strength of \({\rm MP}_{\rm CCC}(\Bbb R)\). Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 51(2), 181–193 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Reitz, J.: The Ground Axiom. PhD thesis, City University of New York (September 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Reitz, J.: The Ground Axiom. Journal of Symbolic Logic 72(4), 1299–1317 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Rittberg, C.J.: The modal logic of forcing. Master’s thesis, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  20. van Benthem, J.F.A.K.: The logic of time. A model-theoretic investigation into the varieties of temporal ontology and temporal discourse. Synthese Library, vol. 156. D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht (1983)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Woodin, W.H.: The continuum hypothesis, the generic multiverse of sets, and the ω conjecture (2009) (preprint)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hamkins, J.D., Löwe, B. (2013). Moving Up and Down in the Generic Multiverse. In: Lodaya, K. (eds) Logic and Its Applications. ICLA 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7750. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36039-8_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36039-8_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-36038-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-36039-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics