[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

Compass Made Good Correction with MTE

  • Conference paper
Telematics in the Transport Environment (TST 2012)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 329))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Imprecise and uncertain data dominate in maritime transportation. The Mathematical Theory of Evidence (MTE) [12, 14] extended to a possibilistic platform [16] enable processing the uncertainty. The Mathematical Theory of Evidence enables upgrading new models and solving crucial problems in many disciplines. The evidence combining scheme as a mechanism enabling enrichment of the initial data information context is useful in many cases. In nautical applications it can be used to make a fix and to evaluate its accuracy. The MTE delivers a new unique opportunity once one engages fuzzy values. Approaches towards a theoretical evaluation of tasks including imprecise data are to be reconsidered. A compass made good correction evaluation is one of such problems. To calculate the correction one has to know the direction towards a landmark or a celestial body. Taking two bearings to landmarks situated at opposite sides is also sufficient. Landmarks situated at counter bearings locations are not available very often.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 35.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 44.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dempster, A.P.: A generalization of Bayesian inference. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B 30, 205–247 (1968)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Denoeux, T.: Modelling Vague Beliefs using Fuzzy Valued Belief Structures. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 116, 167–199 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Filipowicz, W.: Belief Structures in Position Fixing. In: Mikulski, J. (ed.) TST 2010. CCIS, vol. 104, pp. 434–446. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Filipowicz, W.: New Approach towards Position Fixing. Annual of Navigation 16, 41–54 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Filipowicz, W.: Belief Structures and their Application in Navigation. Methods of Applied Informatics 3, 53–82 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Filipowicz, W.: Evidence Representation and Reasoning in Selected Applications. In: Jędrzejowicz, P., Nguyen, N.T., Hoang, K. (eds.) ICCCI 2011, Part II. LNCS, vol. 6923, pp. 251–260. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Jurdzinski, M.: Principles of Marine Navigation. WAM, Gdynia (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lee, E.S., Zhu, Q.: Fuzzy and Evidence Reasoning. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu, W., Hughes, J.G., McTear, M.F.: Representing Heuristic Knowledge and Propagating Beliefs in Dempster-Shafer Theory of Evidence. In: Federizzi, M., Kacprzyk, J., Yager, R.R. (eds.) Advances in the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Evidence, pp. 441–471. John Willey and Sons, Inc., New York (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Liu, W., Hughes, J.G., McTear, M.F.: Representing Heuristic Knowledge in D-S Theory. In: UAI 1992 Proceedings of the Eighth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Klir, G.J., Parviz, B.: Probability – Possibility Transformations: a Comparison. International Journal of General Systems 21(1) (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kłopotek, M.A.: Identification of belief structure in Dempster – Shafer Theory. Foundations of Computing & Decision Sciences 21(1), 35–54 (1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Rutkowski, L.: Methods and Techniques of the Artificial Intelligence. PWN, Warsaw (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shafer, G.: A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1976)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Yager, R.: On the Normalization of Fuzzy Belief Structures. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 14, 127–153 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Yen, J.: Generalizing the Dempster – Shafer theory to fuzzy sets. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 20(3), 559–570 (1990)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Filipowicz, W. (2012). Compass Made Good Correction with MTE. In: Mikulski, J. (eds) Telematics in the Transport Environment. TST 2012. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 329. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34050-5_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34050-5_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-34049-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-34050-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics