Abstract
Business value and coordination process perspectives need to be taken into consideration while modeling business collaborations. The need for these two models stems from the importance of separating the how from the what concerns. A business value model shows what is offered by whom to whom while a coordination process model shows how these offerings are fulfilled operationally. This case study addresses the model transformation between e3value and BPMN, commonly used for modeling business collaborations from value and coordination perspectives respectively.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gordijn, J., Akkermans, H.: Value based requirements engineering: Exploring innovative e-commerce ideas. Requirements Engineering Journal 8, 114–134 (2002)
OMG: Business Process Modeling Notation (BPMN) Version 1.0. OMG Final Adopted Specification. OMG (2006), http://www.bpmn.org/
Tapscott, D., Ticoll, D., Lowy, A.: Digital Capital: Harnessing the Power of Business Webs. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (2000)
Gordijn, J., Akkermans, H., van Vliet, H.: Business modelling is not process modelling. In: ER Workshops, pp. 40–51 (2000)
Andersson, B., et al.: From business to process models - a chaining methodology. In: 8th Int. Conference on the Advanced Information Systems and Engineering, CAiSE 2006 (2006)
Wieringa, R., Pijpers, V., Bodenstaff, L., Gordijn, J.: Value-driven coordination process design using physical delivery models. In: Li, Q., Spaccapietra, S., Yu, E., Olivé, A. (eds.) ER 2008. LNCS, vol. 5231, pp. 216–231. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Weigand, H., et al.: Value object analysis and the transformation from value model to process model. In: Enterprise Interoperability, pp. 55–65. Springer, London (2007)
Fatemi, H., van Sinderen, M.J., Wieringa, R.J.: From business value model to coordination process model. In: Poler, R., van Sinderen, M., Sanchis, R. (eds.) IWEI 2009. LNBIP, vol. 38, pp. 94–106. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Fatemi, H., van Sinderen, M.J., Wieringa, R.J.: Value-oriented coordination process modeling. In: Hull, R., Mendling, J., Tai, S. (eds.) BPM 2010. LNCS, vol. 6336, pp. 162–177. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Zlatev, Z., Wombacher, A.: Consistency between e3-value models and activity diagrams in a multi-perspective development method. In: Chung, S. (ed.) OTM 2005. LNCS, vol. 3760, pp. 520–538. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Bodenstaff, L., Wombacher, A., Reichert, M.U.: On formal consistency between value and coordination models. Technical Report TR-CTIT-07-91, Enschede (2007)
Zarvic, N., Wieringa, R., van Eck, P.: Checking the alignment of value-based business models and it functionality. In: SAC 2008: ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, NY, USA, pp. 607–613 (2008)
Ghamarian, A.H., et al.: Modelling and analysis using GROOVE. International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer (STTT), 1–26 (2011)
Fatemi, H., van Sinderen, M.J., Wieringa, R.J.: Trust and Business Webs. In: The Fifteenth IEEE International EDOC Conference, 29 August-2 September. IEEE Computer Society, Helsinki (in press, 2011)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Fatemi, H., van Sinderen, M., Wieringa, R. (2011). E3value to BPMN Model Transformation. In: Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Pereira-Klen, A., Afsarmanesh, H. (eds) Adaptation and Value Creating Collaborative Networks. PRO-VE 2011. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 362. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23330-2_37
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23330-2_37
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-23329-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-23330-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)