Abstract
Students entering a new field must learn to speak the specialized language of that field. Previous research using automated measures of word overlap has found that students who modify their language to align more closely to a tutor’s language show larger overall learning gains. We present an alternative approach that assesses syntactic as well as lexical alignment in a corpus of human-computer tutorial dialogue. We found distinctive patterns differentiating high and low achieving students. Our high achievers were most likely to mimic their own earlier statements and rarely made mistakes when mimicking the tutor. Low achievers were less likely to reuse their own successful sentence structures, and were more likely to make mistakes when trying to mimic the tutor. We argue that certain types of mimicking should be encouraged in tutorial dialogue systems, an important future research direction.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brennan, S.E.: Lexical entrainment in spontaneous dialog. In: Proceedings of the 1996 International Symposium on Spoken Dialogue, pp. 41–44 (1996)
D’Mello, S.K., Dowell, N., Graesser, A.C.: Cohesion relationships in tutorial dialogue as predictors of affective states. In: Proceedings of AIED 2009, pp. 9–16 (2009)
Dzikovska, M.O., Callaway, C.B., Farrow, E., Moore, J.D., Steinhauser, N.B., Campbell, G.C.: Dealing with interpretation errors in tutorial dialogue. In: Proceedings of SIGDIAL-2009, London, UK (September 2009)
Dzikovska, M.O., Campbell, G.E., Callaway, C.B., Steinhauser, N.B., Farrow, E., Moore, J.D., Butler, L.A., Matheson, C.: Diagnosing natural language answers to support adaptive tutoring. In: Proceedings of the 21st International FLAIRS Conference (2008)
Dzikovska, M.O., Moore, J.D., Steinhauser, N., Campbell, G.: The impact of interpretation problems on tutorial dialogue. In: Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (2010)
Dzikovska, M.O., Moore, J.D., Steinhauser, N., Campbell, G., Farrow, E., Callaway, C.B.: Beetle II: a system for tutoring and computational linguistics experimentation. In: Proceedings of the ACL-2010 Demo Session (2010)
Pickering, M.J., Garrod, S.: Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavior and Brain Sciences 27, 169–226 (2004)
Ward, A., Litman, D.: Cohesion and learning in a tutorial spoken dialog system. In: Proceedings of 19th International FLAIRS Conference (2006)
Ward, A., Litman, D.J.: Dialog convergence and learning. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (2007)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Steinhauser, N.B. et al. (2011). Talk Like an Electrician: Student Dialogue Mimicking Behavior in an Intelligent Tutoring System. In: Biswas, G., Bull, S., Kay, J., Mitrovic, A. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6738. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21869-9_47
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21869-9_47
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21868-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21869-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)