Probabilistic Approach to the Dynamic Ensemble Selection Using Measures of Competence and Diversity of Base Classifiers

1. Aksela, M.: Comparison of classifier selection methods for improving committee performance. In: Windeatt, T., Roli, F. (eds.) MCS 2003. LNCS, vol. 2709, pp. 84–93. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

   Chapter  Google Scholar 

2. Aksela, M., Laaksonen, J.: Using diversity of errors for selecting members of a committee classifier. Pattern Recognition 39, 608–623 (2006)

   Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

3. Berger, J.O.: Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis. Springer, New York (1987)

   Google Scholar 

4. Brown, G., Wyatt, J., Harris, R., Yao, X.: Diversity creation methods: a survey and categorisation. Information Fusion 6, 5–20 (2005)

   Article  Google Scholar 

5. Canuto, A., Abreu, M., et al.: Investigating the influence of the choice of the ensemble members in accuracy and diversity of selection-based and fusion-based methods for ensemble. Pattern Recognition Letters 28, 472–486 (2007)

   Article  Google Scholar 

6. Didaci, L., Giacinto, G., Roli, F., Marcialis, G.: A study on the performances of dynamic classifier selection based on local accuracy estimation. Pattern Recognition 38, 2188–2191 (2005)

   Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

7. Dietterich, T.G.: Approximate statistical tests for comparing supervised classification learning algorithms. Neural Computation 10, 1895–1923 (1998)

   Article  Google Scholar 

8. Duda, R., Hart, P., Stork, G.: Pattern Classification. John Wiley and Sons, New York (2000)

   MATH  Google Scholar 

9. Duin, R., Juszczak, P., Paclik, P., et al.: PRTools4. In: A Matlab Toolbox for Pattern Recognition, Delft University of Technology (2007)

   Google Scholar 

10. Eulanda, M., Santos, D., Sabourin, R., Maupin, P.: A dynamic overproduce-and-choose strategy for the selection of classifier ensembles. Pattern Recognition 41, 2993–3009 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

11. Giacinto, G., Roli, F.: Dynamic classifier selection based on multiple classifier behaviour. Pattern Recognition 34, 1879–1881 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

12. Huenupan, F., Yoma, N., et al.: Confidence based multiple classifier fusion in speaker verification. Pattern Recognition Letters 29, 957–966 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

13. Kanal, L.: Patterns in pattern recognition. IEEE Trans. Information Theory 20, 697–722 (1974)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

14. Ko, A., Sabourin, R., Britto, A.: From dynamic classifier selection to dynamic ensemble selection. Pattern Recognition 41, 1718–1733 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

15. Kuncheva, I.: Combining Pattern Classifiers: Methods and Algorithms. Wiley Interscience, Hoboken (2004)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

16. Smits, P.: Multiple classifier systems for supervised remote sensing image classification based on dynamic classifier selection. IEEE Trans. on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 40, 717–725 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

17. Woloszynski, M., Kurzynski, M.: A measure of competence based on randomized reference classifier for dynamic ensemble selection. In: 20th Int. Conf. on Pattern Recognition, pp. 4194–4197. IEEE Computer Press, Istanbul (2010)

    Google Scholar 

18. Woloszynski, T.: Matlab Central File Enchange (2010), http://www.mathwork.com/matlabcentral/fileenchange/28391-classifier-competence-based-on-probabilistic-modeling

19. Woods, K., Kegelmeyer, W., Bowyer, W.: Combination of multiple classifiers using local accuracy estimates. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Learning 19, 405–410 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references