Abstract
We describe two complementary techniques to aid the automatic verification of safety properties of synchronous systems by model checking. A first technique allows the automatic generation of certain inductive invariants for mode variables. Such invariants are crucial in the verification of safety properties in systems with complex modal behavior. A second technique allows the simultaneous verification of multiple properties incrementally. Specifically, the outcome of a property—valid or invalid—is communicated to the user as soon as it is known. Moreover, each property proven valid is used immediately as an invariant in the model checking procedure to aid the verification of the remaining properties. We have implemented these techniques as new options in the Kind model checker. Experimental evidence shows that these two techniques combine synergistically to increase Kind’s precision as well as its speed.
This work was partially supported by AFOSR grant #AF9550-09-1-0517, NSF grant CNS-1035715, DGA/MRIS/ERE support and FNRAE Cavale project.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Damas, C., Lambeau, B., Dupont, P., van Lamsweerde, A.: Generating annotated behavior models from end-user scenarios. IEEE Transactions on SE 31(12), 1056–1073 (2005)
Damas, C., Lambeau, B., Roucoux, F., van Lamsweerde, A.: Analyzing critical process models through behavior model synthesis. In: ICSE 2009, pp. 441–451. IEEE (2009)
de Moura, L., Rueß, H., Sorea, M.: Bounded Model Checking and Induction: From Refutation to Verification. In: Hunt Jr., W.A., Somenzi, F. (eds.) CAV 2003. LNCS, vol. 2725, pp. 14–26. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Gurfinkel, A., Chechik, M., Devereux, B.: Temporal logic query checking: a tool for model exploration. IEEE Transactions on SE 29(10), 898–914 (2003)
Hagen, G., Tinelli, C.: Scaling up the formal verification of Lustre programs with SMT-based techniques. In: FMCAD 2008, pp. 1–9. IEEE Press, Piscataway (2008)
Halbwachs, N., Caspi, P., Raymond, P., Pilaud, D.: The synchronous data-flow programming language Lustre. Proceedings of the IEEE 79(9), 1305–1320 (1991)
Hangal, S., Narayanan, S., Chandra, N., Chakravorty, S.: IODINE: a tool to automatically infer dynamic invariants for hardware designs. In: DAC 2005, pp. 775–778 (June 2005)
Jeffords, R., Heitmeyer, C.: Automatic generation of state invariants from requirements specifications. SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes 23, 56–69 (1998)
Jeffords, R., Heitmeyer, C.: An algorithm for strengthening state invariants generated from requirements specifications. In: RE 2001, pp. 182–191 (2001)
Kahsai, T., Ge, Y., Tinelli, C.: Instantiation-Based Invariant Discovery. In: Bobaru, M., Havelund, K., Holzmann, G.J., Joshi, R. (eds.) NFM 2011. LNCS, vol. 6617, pp. 192–206. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Kahsai, T., Tinelli, C.: PKIND: a parallel k-induction based model checker. In: PDMC 2011. EPTCS, vol. 72, pp. 55–62 (2011)
Khasidashvili, Z., Nadel, A., Palti, A., Hanna, Z.: Simultaneous SAT-Based Model Checking of Safety Properties. In: Ur, S., Bin, E., Wolfsthal, Y. (eds.) HVC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3875, pp. 56–75. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Manna, Z., Pnueli, A.: Temporal Verification of Reactive Systems: Safety. Springer (1995)
Sampson, M., Derevenko, V.: Interface definition document (IDD) for international space station (ISS) visiting vehicles (VVs). Technical report, NASA (2000)
Sheeran, M., Singh, S., Stålmarck, G.: Checking Safety Properties Using Induction and a SAT-Solver. In: Johnson, S.D., Hunt Jr., W.A. (eds.) FMCAD 2000. LNCS, vol. 1954, pp. 108–125. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kahsai, T., Garoche, PL., Tinelli, C., Whalen, M. (2012). Incremental Verification with Mode Variable Invariants in State Machines. In: Goodloe, A.E., Person, S. (eds) NASA Formal Methods. NFM 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7226. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28891-3_35
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28891-3_35
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-28890-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-28891-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)