Experiences with Service-Oriented Middleware for Dynamic Instrumentation of Enterprise DRE Systems

1. Bleiholder, J., Naumann, F.: Data Fusion. ACM Computing Surveys 41, 1:1–1:41 (2009), http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1456650.1456651

2. Bruening, D., Garnett, T., Amarasinghe, S.: An Infrastructure for Adaptive Dynamic Optimization. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Code Generation and Optimization: Feedback-Directed and Runtime Optimization, CGO 2003, pp. 265–275. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA (2003), http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=776261.776290

   Google Scholar 

3. Cantrill, B., Shapiro, M.W., Leventhal, A.H.: Dynamic Instrumentation of Production Systems. In: Proceedings of the General Track: 2004 USENIX Annual Technical Conference, pp. 15–28 (June 2004)

   Google Scholar 

4. Chappell, D.: Introducing the windows azure platform (2009) (retrieved May 30, 2010)

   Google Scholar 

5. Dekkers, P.: Complex Event Processing. Master’s thesis, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands (October 2007)

   Google Scholar 

6. Domingues, P., Marques, P., Silva, L.: Distributed Data Collection through Remote Probing in Windows Environments. In: 13th Euromicro Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Network-Based Processing, PDP 2005, pp. 59–65. IEEE (2005)

   Google Scholar 

7. Hill, J.H., Sutherland, H., Staudinger, P., Silveria, T., Schmidt, D.C., Slaby, J.M., Visnevski, N.: OASIS: An Architecture for Dynamic Instrumentation of Enterprise Distributed Real-time and Embedded Systems. International Journal of Computer Systems Science and Engineering, Special Issue: Real-time Systems (April 2011)

   Google Scholar 

8. Hudgins, G., Poch, K., Secondine, J.: The Test and Training Enabling Architecture (TENA) Enabling Technology For The Joint Mission Environment Test Capability (JMETC) and Other Emerging Range Systems. In: Proceeding of U.S. Air Force T&E Days (2009)

   Google Scholar 

9. Lenzerini, M.: Data Integration: A Theoretical Perspective. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-First ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems PODS 2002, pp. 233–246. ACM, New York (2002), http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/543613.543644

   Chapter  Google Scholar 

10. Luk, C.K., Cohn, R., Muth, R., Patil, H., Klauser, A., Lowney, G., Wallace, S., Reddi, V.J., Hazelwood, K.: Pin: Building Customized Program Analysis Tools with Dynamic Instrumentation. SIGPLAN Notes 40, 190–200 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

11. Menasce, D.A., Dowdy, L.W., Almeida, V.A.F.: Performance by Design: Computer Capacity Planning By Example. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River (2004)

    Google Scholar 

12. Microsoft Corporation: Microsoft.NET Framework 3.0 Community (2007), http://www.netfx3.com

13. Object Management Group: Light Weight CORBA Component Model Revised Submission, OMG Document realtime/03-05-05 edn. (May 2003)

    Google Scholar 

14. Object Management Group: Data Distribution Service for Real-time Systems Specification, 1.2 edn. (January 2007)

    Google Scholar 

15. Object Management Group: The Common Object Request Broker: Architecture and Specification Version 3.1, Part 1: CORBA Interfaces, OMG Document formal/2008-01-04 edn. (January 2008)

    Google Scholar 

16. Object Management Group: The Common Object Request Broker: Architecture and Specification Version 3.1, Part 2: CORBA Interoperability, OMG Document formal/2008-01-07 edn. (January 2008)

    Google Scholar 

17. Object Management Group: The Common Object Request Broker: Architecture and Specification Version 3.1, Part 3: CORBA Component Model, OMG Document formal/2008-01-08 edn. (January 2008)

    Google Scholar 

18. O’Hair, K.: The JVMPI Transition to JVMTI (2006), http://java.sun.com/developer/technicalArticles/Programming/jvmpitransition

19. Radha, V., Ramakrishna, S., kumar, N.P.: Generic XML Schema Definition (XSD) to GUI Translator. In: Chakraborty, G. (ed.) ICDCIT 2005. LNCS, vol. 3816, pp. 290–296. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

20. Schmidt, D.C., Stal, M., Rohnert, H., Buschmann, F.: Pattern-Oriented Software Architecture: Patterns for Concurrent and Networked Objects, vol. 2. Wiley & Sons, New York (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

21. Smith, C., Williams, L.: Performance Solutions: A Practical Guide to Creating Responsive, Scalable Software. Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston (2001)

    Google Scholar 

22. Srivastava, A., Eustace, A.: ATOM: A System for Building Customized Program Analysis Tools. In: PLDI 1994: Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN 1994 Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, pp. 196–205 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

23. Stefani, A., Xenos, M.N.: Meta-metric Evaluation of E-Commerce-related Metrics. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science (ENTCS) 233, 59–72 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

24. Tan, Z., Leal, W., Welch, L.: Verification of Instrumentation Techniques for Resource Management of Real-time Systems. J. Syst. Softw. 80(7), 1015–1022 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

25. Varia, J.: Cloud architectures. White Paper of Amazon, jineshvaria. s3. amazonaws. com/public/cloudarchitectures-varia. pdf (2008)

    Google Scholar 

26. Visnevski, N.: Embedded Instrumentation Systems Architecture. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (May 2008)

    Google Scholar 

27. Waddington, D.G., Roy, N., Schmidt, D.C.: Dynamic Analysis and Profiling of Multi-threaded Systems. In: Tiako, P.F. (ed.) Designing Software-Intensive Systems: Methods and Principles, Idea Group (2007)

    Google Scholar 

28. White, B., Lepreau, J., Stoller, L., Ricci, R., Guruprasad, S., Newbold, M., Hibler, M., Barb, C., Joglekar, A.: An integrated experimental environment for distributed systems and networks. In: Proc. of the Fifth Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, pp. 255–270. USENIX Association, Boston (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references