[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

Runtime Verification of Component-Based Systems

  • Conference paper
Software Engineering and Formal Methods (SEFM 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 7041))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Verification of component-based systems still suffers from limitations such as state space explosion since a large number of different components may interact in an heterogeneous environment. Those limitations entail the need for complementary verification methods such as runtime verification based on dynamic analysis and prone to scalability. In this paper, we integrate runtime verification into the BIP (Behavior, Interaction, and Priority) framework. BIP is a powerful component-based framework for the construction of heterogeneous systems. Our method augments BIP systems with monitors checking a user-provided specification. This method has been implemented in RV-BIP, a prototype tool that we used to validate the whole approach on a robotic application.

This work is partially supported by the FP7 IP ASCENS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 35.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 44.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bliudze, S., Sifakis, J.: A Notion of Glue Expressiveness for Component-Based Systems. In: van Breugel, F., Chechik, M. (eds.) CONCUR 2008. LNCS, vol. 5201, pp. 508–522. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Runtime Verification (2001-2010), http://www.runtime-verification.org

  3. Bauer, A., Leucker, M., Schallhart, C.: Comparing ltl semantics for runtime verification. J. Log. Comput. 20, 651–674 (2010)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Falcone, Y., Fernandez, J.C., Mounier, L.: Runtime verification of safety-progress properties. In: [27], pp. 40–59

    Google Scholar 

  5. Basu, A., Bozga, M., Sifakis, J.: Modeling heterogeneous real-time components in BIP. In: 4th IEEE Int. Conf. on Software Engineering and Formal Methods (SEFM 2006), pp. 3–12 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bliudze, S., Sifakis, J.: The algebra of connectors—structuring interaction in BIP. IEEE Transactions on Computers 57, 1315–1330 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Stolz, V.: Temporal assertions with parametrised propositions. In: Sokolsky, O., Taşıran, S. (eds.) RV 2007. LNCS, vol. 4839, pp. 176–187. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Fleury, S., Herrb, M., Chatila, R.: GenoM: A Tool for the Specification and the Implementation of Operating Modules in a Distributed Robot Architecture. In: Proceedings of Intelligent Robots and Systems, IROS 1997, pp. 842–848. IEEE, Los Alamitos (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bensalem, S., Gallien, M., Ingrand, F., Kahloul, I., Nguyen, T.H.: Toward a more dependable software architecture for autonomous robots. IEEE Robotics and Automaton Magazine, Special issue on Soft. Engineering for Robotics 16, 67–77 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Umrigar, Z.D., Pitchumani, V.: Formal verification of a real-time hardware design. In: DAC 1983: Proceedings of the 20th Design Automation Conference, pp. 221–227. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (1983)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Queille, J.P., Sifakis, J.: Specification and verification of concurrent systems in CESAR. In: Dezani-Ciancaglini, M., Montanari, U. (eds.) Programming 1982. LNCS, vol. 137, pp. 337–351. Springer, Heidelberg (1982)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Clarke, E.M., Emerson, E.A.: Synthesis of synchronisation skeletons for branching time temporal logic. In: Kozen, D. (ed.) Logic of Programs 1981. LNCS, vol. 131, pp. 52–71. Springer, Heidelberg (1982)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. McMillan, K.: Symbolic model checking. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston (1993)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Burch, J., Clarke, E., McMillan, K., Dill, D., Hwang, L.: Symbolic model checking: 1020 states and beyond. In: Proceedings of the 5th Syposium on Logic in Computer science, pp. 428–439 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Clarke, E., Biere, A., Raimi, R., Zhu, Y.: Bounded model checking using satisfiability solving. Form. Methods Syst. Des. 19, 7–34 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Clarke, E., Long, D., McMillan, K.: Compositional model checking. In: Proceedings of the 4th Annual Symposium on LICS, pp. 353–362. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chang, E., Manna, Z., Pnueli, A.: Compositional verification of real-time systems. In: Symposium on Logic in Computer Science. IEEE, Los Alamitos (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Long, D.E.: Model Checking, Abstraction, and Compositional Reasoning. PhD thesis, Carnegie Mellon (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bensalem, S., Bozga, M., Sifakis, J., Nguyen, T.H.: Compositional verification for component-based systems and application. Software Journal, Special Issue on Automated Compositional Verification 4, 181–193 (2010)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Bensalem, S., Bogza, M., Legay, A., Nguyen, T.H., Sifakis, J., Yan, R.: Incremental component-based construction and verification using invariants. In: FMCAD (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Meyer, B.: Applying design by contract. Computer 25, 40–51 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Abadi, M., Lamport, L.: Composing specifications. ACM Transaction on Programming Languages and Systems 15, 73–132 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ben-Hafaiedh, I., Graf, S., Quinton, S.: Reasoning about safety and progress using contracts. In: Dong, J.S., Zhu, H. (eds.) ICFEM 2010. LNCS, vol. 6447, pp. 436–451. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Kähkönen, K., Lampinen, J., Heljanko, K., Niemelä, I.: The lime interface specification language and runtime monitoring tool. In: [27], pp. 93–100

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bodden, E., Lam, P., Hendren, L.J.: Clara: A framework for partially evaluating finite-state runtime monitors ahead of time. In: [28], pp. 183–197

    Google Scholar 

  26. Falcone, Y.: You should better enforce than verify. In: [28], pp. 89–105

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bensalem, S., Peled, D. (eds.): RV 2009. LNCS, vol. 5779. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Barringer, H., Falcone, Y., Finkbeiner, B., Havelund, K., Lee, I., Pace, G.J., Rosu, G., Sokolsky, O., Tillmann, N. (eds.): RV 2010. LNCS, vol. 6418. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Falcone, Y., Jaber, M., Nguyen, TH., Bozga, M., Bensalem, S. (2011). Runtime Verification of Component-Based Systems. In: Barthe, G., Pardo, A., Schneider, G. (eds) Software Engineering and Formal Methods. SEFM 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7041. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24690-6_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24690-6_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-24689-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-24690-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics