Abstract
The results of a dose survey of digital x-ray imaging equipment in a breast screening programme have been used to compare the measured dose values to the dose values displayed by the mammography systems. A total of 12,104 images were used in the survey, acquired on three types of digital mammography system: GE Essential, Hologic Selenia and Sectra MDM L30. The results reveal that estimates of the MGD were largely similar between measured and displayed dose for all models in the survey. It was found that large discrepancies could occur on individual systems which may be attributable to various factors including inaccurate QA measurement data and poorly calibrated mammography systems.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
KCARE: Report 05037 Comparative Specifications of Full Field Digital Mammography Systems. KCARE, Kings College Hospital (2005)
Dance, D.R.: Monte Carlo Calculation of Conversion Factors for Estimation of Mean Glandular Breast Dose. Phys. Med. Biol. 35, 1211–1219 (1990)
Dance, D.R., Skinner, C.L., Young, K.C., Beckett, J.R., Kotre, C.J.: Additional Factors for the Estimation of Mean Glandular Breast Dose Using the UK Mammography Dosimetry Protocol. Phys. Med. Biol. 45, 3225–3240 (2000)
Dance, D.R., Young, K.C., van Engen, R.E.: Further Factors for the Estimation of Mean Glandular Dose using the United Kingdom, European and IAEA Breast Dosimetry Protocols. Phys. Med. Biol. 54, 4361–4372 (2009)
Wu, X., Barnes, G.T., Tucker, D.M.: Spectral Dependence of Glandular Tissue Dose in Screen-Film Mammography. Radiology 179, 143–148 (1991)
Wu, X., Gingold, E.L., Barnes, G.T., Tucker, D.M.: Normalized Average Glandular Dose in Molybdenum Target-Rhodium Filter and Rhodium Target-Rhodium Filter Mammography. Radiology 193, 83–89 (1994)
Burch, A.: Measurement of Mean Glandular Dose. In: Mammography Physics Training, IPEM, Aston University, Birmingham (2009)
NHSBSP Report 04/05: Breast Dose Surveys in the NSBSP: Software and Instruction Manual. Version 2.0 (2004)
Van Engen, R., van Woudengerg, S., Bosmans, H., Young, K., Thijssen, M.: European Protocol for the Quality Control of the Physical and Technical Aspects of Mammography Screening. In: Perry, N., Broeders, M., de Wolf, C., Törnberg, S., Holland, R., von Karsa, L. (eds.) European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis, 4th edn., pp. 61–165. European Commission, Luxemburg (2006)
Cole, H., Lawinski, C.P., Goodman, D.A.: A Comparative Study of Indicated Breast Dose in Conventional and Digital Mammography Systems. UKRC (2003)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
McCullagh, J.B., Baldelli, P., Phelan, N. (2010). Measured Dose versus Organ Dose Performance in Digital Mammography Systems. In: Martí, J., Oliver, A., Freixenet, J., Martí, R. (eds) Digital Mammography. IWDM 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6136. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13666-5_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13666-5_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-13665-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-13666-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)