Assembly Planning and Task Planning — Two Prerequisites for Automated Robot Programming

1. Mason, M.T.: Compliance and force control for computer controlled manipulators. IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 11, 418–432 (1981)

   Article  Google Scholar 

2. Raibert, M.H., Craig, J.J.: Hybrid position/force control of manipulators. ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control 102, 126–133 (1981)

   Article  Google Scholar 

3. Schutter, J., van Brussel, J.: Compliant robot motion II. A control approach based on external control loops. The International Journal of Robotics Research 7(4), 18–33 (1988)

   Article  Google Scholar 

4. Schutter, J., van Brussel, J.: Compliant robot motion I. A formalism for specifying compliant motion tasks. The International Journal of Robotics Research 7(5), 3–17 (1988)

   Article  Google Scholar 

5. Khatib, O.: A unified approach for motion and force control of robot manipulators: The operational space formulation. IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation, RA 3(1), 43–53 (1987)

   Article  Google Scholar 

6. Hasegawa, T., Suehiro, T., Takase, K.: A model-based manipulation system with skill-based execution. IEEE Trans. on Robotics and Automation 8(4), 535–544 (1992)

   Article  Google Scholar 

7. Mosemann, H., Wahl, F.M.: Automatic decomposition of planned assembly sequences into skill primitives. IEEE Trans. on Robotics and Automation 17(5), 709–718 (2001)

   Article  Google Scholar 

8. Thomas, U., Finkemeyer, B., Kröger, T., Wahl, F.M.: Error-tolerant execution of complex robot tasks based on skill primitives. In: Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Taipei, Taiwan, vol. 3, pp. 3069–3075 (2003)

   Google Scholar 

9. Finkemeyer, B.: Robotersteuerungsarchitektur auf der Basis von Aktionsprimitiven (in German). Shaker Verlag, Aachen (2004)

   Google Scholar 

10. Kröger, T., Finkemeyer, B., Thomas, U., Wahl, F.M.: Compliant motion programming: The task frame formalism revisited. In: Mechatronics and Robotics, Aachen, Germany, pp. 1029–1034 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

11. Thomas, U., Wahl, F.M., Maaß, J., Hesselbach, J.: Towards a new concept of robot programming in high speed assembly applications. In: Proc. of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Edmonton, Canada, pp. 3827–3833 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

12. Maaß, J., Molkenstruck, S., Thomas, U., Hesselbach, J., Wahl, F.M.: Definition and execution of a generic assembly programming paradigm. Assembly Automation 28(1), 61–68 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

13. Lieberman, L.I., Wesley, M.A.: AUTOPASS: An automatic programming system for computer controlled mechanical assembly. IBM Journal of Rersearch and Development 21(4), 321–333 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

14. Lozano-Pérez, T., Winston, P.: LAMA: A language for automatic assembly. In: Proc. of the International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 710–716 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

15. Ambler, A.P., Popplestone, R.J.: Inferring the position of bodies from specified spatial relationships. Artificial Intelligence 6(2), 124–157 (1975)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

16. Levi, P.: Planen für autonome Montageroboter (in German). Springer, Heidelberg (1988)

    Google Scholar 

17. Bourjault, A.: Methodology of Assembly Automation: A New Approach. Springer, New York (1987)

    Google Scholar 

18. Wilson, R.H.: On Geometric Assembly Planning. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA (1992)

    Google Scholar 

19. Halperin, D., Wilson, R.H.: Assembly partitioning along simple paths: The case of multiple translations. In: Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Nagoya, Japan, vol. 2, pp. 1585–1592 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

20. Kaufman, S.G., Wilson, R.H., Jones, R.E., Calton, T.L., Ames, A.L.: The archimedes 2 mechanical assembly planning system. In: Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Minneapolis, MN, USA, vol. 4, pp. 3361–3368 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

21. Knoll, A., Hildenbrandt, B., Zhang, J.: Instructing cooperating assembly robots through situated dialogues in natural languages. In: Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Albuquerque, NM, USA, vol. 1, pp. 888–894 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

22. Schwarzer, F., Schweikard, A., Joskowicz, L.: Efficient linear unboundedness testing: Algorithm and applications to translational assembly planning. The International Journal of Robotics Research 19(9), 817–834 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

23. Ostrovsky-Berman, Y., Joskowicz, L.: Relative position computation for assembly planning with planar toleranced parts. The International Journal of Robotics Research 25(2), 147–170 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

24. Laugier, C.: Planning fine motion strategies by reasoning in the contact space. In: Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Scottsdale, AZ, USA, vol. 2, pp. 653–659 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

25. Hirai, S.: Analysis and Planning of Manipulation Using the Theory of Polyhedral Convex Cones. Ph.D. thesis, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan (1991)

    Google Scholar 

26. Xiao, J.: Goal-contact relaxation graphs for contact-based fine motion planning. In: Proc. of the IEEE International Symposium on Assembly and Task Planning, Marina del Rey, CA, USA, pp. 25–30 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

27. Ji, X., Xiao, J.: Automatic generation of high-level contact state space. In: Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Detroit, MI, USA, vol. 1, pp. 238–244 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

28. Lefebvre, T., Bruynincks, H., Schutter, J.D.: Polyhedral contact formation identification for autonomous compliant motion: Exact nonlinear bayesian filtering. IEEE Trans. on Robotics 21(1), 124–129 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

29. Meeussen, W., Staffetti, E., Bruyninckx, H., Xiao, J., De Schutter, J.J.: Integration of planning and execution in force controlled compliant motion. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 56(5), 437–450 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

30. Kavraki, L.E., Kolountzakis, M.N.: Partitioning a planar assembly into two connected parts is np-complete. Information Processing Letters 55(3), 159–165 (1995)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

31. Lozano-Pérez, T.: Spatial planning: A configuration space approach. IEEE Trans. on Computers, C 32(2), 108–120 (1983)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

32. Charzelle, B., Palios, L.: Decomposing the boundary of a nonconvex polyhedron. Algorithmica 17(3), 245–265 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

33. Thomas, U.: Automatisierte Programmierung von Robotern für Montageaufgaben (in German). Shaker Verlag, Aachen (2008)

    Google Scholar 

34. Scaramelli, L., Mello, H.D.: Task Sequence Planning for Robotic Assembly. Ph.D. thesis, Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA (1989)

    Google Scholar 

35. Maaß, J., Reisinger, T., Hesselbach, J., Schumacher, W.: A versatile robot control architecture for sensor integrated assembly. In: Proc. of ISR/Robotik (2006)

    Google Scholar 

36. Kröger, T., Finkemeyer, B., Wahl, F.M.: Manipulation Primitives — A Universal Interface Between Sensor-Based Motion Control and Robot Programming. In: Schütz, D., Wahl, F.M. (eds.) Robotic Systems for Handling and Assembly. STAR, vol. 67, pp. 293–313. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Google Scholar 

37. Maaß, J., Dietrich, F., Hesselbach, J.: RCA562: Control Architecture for Parallel Kinematic Robots. In: Schütz, D., Wahl, F.M. (eds.) Robotic Systems for Handling and Assembly. STAR, vol. 67, pp. 315–331. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Google Scholar 

38. Lefebvre, T., Bruynincks, H., Schutter, J.D.: Polyhedral Contact Formation Modelling and Indentification for Autonomous Compliant Motion. IEEE Trans. on Robotics and Automation 19(1), 26–41 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references