Abstract
Ontologies are commonly used in computer science either as a reference model to support semantic interoperability, or as an artifact that should be efficiently represented to support tractable automated reasoning. This duality poses a tradeoff between expressivity and computational tractability that should be addressed in different phases of an ontology engineering process. The inadequate choice of a modeling language, disregarding the goal of each ontology engineering phase, can lead to serious problems in the deployment of the resulting model. This article discusses these issues by making use of an industrial case study in the domain of Oil and Gas. We make explicit the differences between two different representations in this domain, and highlight a number of concepts and ideas that were implicit in an original OWL-DL model and that became explicit by applying the methodological directives underlying an ontologically well-founded modeling language.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Mealy, G.H.: Another Look at Data. In: Proceedings of the Fall Joint Computer Conference, Anaheim, California, November 14–16. AFIPS Conference Proceedings, vol. 31, pp. 525–534. Thompson Books, Academic Press, Washington, London (1967)
Burek, P., et al.: A top-level ontology of functions and its application in the Open Biomedical Ontologies. Bioinformatics 22(14), e66–e73 (2006)
Fielding, J., et al.: Ontological Theory for Ontology Engineering. In: International Conf. on the Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 2004), 9th, Whistler, Canada, Proceedings (2004)
Guarino, N.: Formal Ontology and Information Systems. In: 1st International Conference on Formal Ontologies in Information Systems, Trento, Italy, June 1998, pp. 3–15 (1998)
Guizzardi, G.: Ontological Foundations for Structural Conceptual Models, Telematica Instituut Fundamental Research Series No. 15. Universal Press, The Netherlands (2005)
Levesque, H., Brachman, R.: Expressiveness and Tractability in Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. Computational Intelligence 3(1), 78–93 (1987)
Guizzardi, G., Halpin, T.: Ontological Foundations for Conceptual Modeling. Applied Ontology 3(1-2), 91–110 (2008)
Chum, F.: Use Case: Ontology-Driven Information Integration and Delivery - A Survey of Semantic Web Technology in the Oil and Gas Industry, W3C (April 2007), http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/sweo/public/UseCases/Chevron/ (accessed in Decemeber 2007)
Cappelli, C., Baião, F., Santoro, F., Iendrike, H., Lopes, M., Nunes, V.T.: An Approach for Constructing Domain Ontologies from Business Process Models. In: II Workshop on Ontologies and Metamodeling in Software and Data Engineering (WOMSDE) (2007) (in Portuguese)
Baião, F., Santoro, F., Iendrike, H., Cappelli, C., Lopes, M., Nunes, V.T., Dumont, A.P.: Towards a Data Integration Approach based on Business Process Models and Domain Ontologies. In: 10th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS 2008), Barcelona, pp. 338–342 (2008)
Thomas, J.E.: Fundamentals of Petroleum Engineering. Rio de Janeiro, Interciência (2001) (in Portuguese)
Guizzardi, G., Wagner, G.: What’s in a Relationship: An Ontological Analysis. In: Li, Q., Spaccapietra, S., Yu, E., Olivé, A. (eds.) ER 2008. LNCS, vol. 5231. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Guizzardi, G., Wagner, G., Guarino, N., van Sinderen, M.: An Ontologically Well-Founded Profile for UML Conceptual Models. In: Persson, A., Stirna, J. (eds.) CAiSE 2004. LNCS, vol. 3084, pp. 112–126. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Smith, B., et al.: Relations in biomedical ontologies. Genome Biology 6(5) (2005)
Artale, A., Keet, M.: Essential and Mandatory Part-Whole Relations in Conceptual Data Models. In: 21st International Workshop on Description Logics, Dresden (2008)
Keet, M., Artale, A.: Representing and Reasoning over a Taxonomy of Part-Whole Relations. In: Guizzardi, G., Halpin, T. (eds.) Special Issue on Ontological Foundations for Conceptual Modeling, Applied Ontology, vol. 3(1-2), pp. 91–110 (2008) ISSN 1570-5838
Thomasson, A.L.: Fiction and Metaphysics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)
das Graças, A.: Extending a Model-Based Tool for Ontologically Well-Founded Conceptual Modeling with Rule Visualization Support. In: Computer Engineering Monograph, Ontology and Conceptual Modeling Research Group (NEMO), Federal University of Espirito Santo, Brazil (2008)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Guizzardi, G., Lopes, M., Baião, F., Falbo, R. (2009). On the Importance of Truly Ontological Distinctions for Ontology Representation Languages: An Industrial Case Study in the Domain of Oil and Gas. In: Halpin, T., et al. Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling. BPMDS EMMSAD 2009 2009. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 29. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01862-6_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01862-6_19
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-01861-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-01862-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)