[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

A Method and Tool for Fact Type Reuse in the DOGMA Ontology Framework

  • Conference paper
On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2009 (OTM 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 5871))

Abstract

In the DOGMA approach to ontology engineering, the construction of an ontology starts from a “Lexon Base”, a possibly very large and un-interpreted base of plausible elementary fact types called lexons. Lexons - mined from various linguistic sources such as schemas, texts or domain experts - are used to create ontological commitments by selecting or reusing a meaningful set of lexons and together with constraints so that the intended conceptualization is well approximated. All too often, the same or similar lexons are entered in the Lexon Base, which causes heterogeneity among different ontological commitments. Due to this heterogeneity, meaning negotiation to agree upon a common commitment becomes more difficult. Encouraging lexon reuse by providing knowledge engineers and domain experts an automated process for finding relevant lexons in the Lexon Base or existing ontological commitments can tackle this problem. In this paper, we introduce a novel approach to fact type reuse that we will apply to DOGMA MESS, a state-of-the-art collaborative ontology engineering methodology. The method we propose uses several heuristics that reside in one of the six semiotic levels described by Ronald Stamper’s semiotic ladder and adds a pragmatic and social layer onto the current methodology and tools. We provide a proof of concept by implementing our method in a tool for finding relevant lexons while building an ontological commitment in a production environment called DOGMA Studio Workbench.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bontas, E.P., Mochol, M.: Towards a cost estimation model for ontology engineering. In: Eckstein, R., Tolksdorf, R. (eds.) Berliner XML Tage, pp. 153–160 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bontas, E.P., Mochol, M.: Towards a reuse-oriented methodology for ontology engineering. In: Proc. of 7th International Conference on Terminology and Knowledge Engineering, TKE 2005 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bontas, E.P., Tempich, C., Sure, Y.: Ontocom: A cost estimation model for ontology engineering. In: Cruz, I., Decker, S., Allemang, D., Preist, C., Schwabe, D., Mika, P., Uschold, M., Aroyo, L.M. (eds.) ISWC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4273, pp. 625–639. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Christiaens, S., De Leenheer, P., de Moor, A., Meersman, R.: Business use case: Ontologising competencies in an interorganisational setting. In: Hepp, M., De Leenheer, P., de Moor, A., Sure, Y. (eds.) Ontology Management for the Semantic Web, Semantic Web Services, and Business Applications, from Semantic Web and Beyond: Computing for Human Experience. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cohen, W.W., Ravikumar, P., Fienberg, S.E.: A comparison of string metrics for matching names and records. In: Data Cleaning Workshop in Conjunction with KDD (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. De Leenheer, P., Christiaens, S., Meersman, R.: Business semantics management: a case study for competency-centric HRM. Journal of Computers For Industry (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. De Leenheer, P., de Moor, A., Meersman, R.: Context dependency management in ontology engineering: a formal approach. In: Spaccapietra, S., Atzeni, P., Fages, F., Hacid, M.-S., Kifer, M., Mylopoulos, J., Pernici, B., Shvaiko, P., Trujillo, J., Zaihrayeu, I. (eds.) Journal on Data Semantics VIII. LNCS, vol. 4380, pp. 26–56. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. De Leenheer, P.: On Community-based Ontology Evolution. In: Manuscript, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. De Leenheer, P., Debruyne, C.: DOGMA-MESS: A tool for factoriented collaborative ontology evolution. In: On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2008: ORM (ORM 2008), Monterrey, Mexico. LNCS. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. de Moor, A., De Leenheer, P., Meersman, R.: DOGMA-MESS: A meaning evolution support system for interorganizational ontology engineering. In: Schärfe, H., Hitzler, P., Øhrstrøm, P. (eds.) ICCS 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4068, pp. 189–203. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Euzenat, J., Shvaiko, P.: Ontology matching. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Falkenberg, E.D., Hesse, W., Lindgreen, P., Nilsson, B.E., Oei, J.L.H., Rolland, C., Stamper, R.K., Assche, F.J.M.V., Verrijn-Stuart, A.A., Voss, K.: Frisco: A framework of information system concepts. Technical report, The IFIP WG 8. 1 Task Group FRISCO (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fellbaum, C.: WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Fernández-López, M., Gómez-Pérez, A.: Overview and analysis of methodologies for building ontologies. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 17(2), 129–156 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gruber, T.R.: Towards Principles for the Design of Ontologies Used for Knowledge Sharing. In: Guarino, N., Poli, R. (eds.) Formal Ontology in Conceptual Analysis and Knowledge Representation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Deventer (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Guarino, N., Giaretta, P.: Ontologies and knowledge bases: Towards a terminological clarification. In: Mars, N.J.I. (ed.) Towards Very Large Knowledge Bases. IOS Press, Amsterdam (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Halpin, T.A.: Information Modeling and Relational Databases: From Conceptual Analysis to Logical Design. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jarrar, M., Meersman, R.: Formal ontology engineering in the DOGMA approach. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z., et al. (eds.) CoopIS 2002, DOA 2002, and ODBASE 2002. LNCS, vol. 2519, pp. 1238–1254. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Meersman, R.: Semantic web and ontologies: Playtime or business at the last frontier in computing? In: NSF-EU Workshop on Database and Information Systems Research for Semantic Web and Enterprises, NSF-EU, pp. 61–67 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Meersman, R.: Semantics ontology tools in information system design. In: Raś, Z., Zemankova, M. (eds.) ISMIS 1999. LNCS, vol. 1609. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pinto, H.S., Peralta, D.N., Mamede, N.J.: Using protege-2000 in reuse processes. In: Proceedings of the OntoWeb-SIG3 Workshop at the 13th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management EKAW (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pinto, H.S., Jo a, P.M.: A methodology for ontology integration. In: K-CAP 2001: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Knowledge capture, pp. 131–138. ACM, New York (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Spyns, P., Meersman, R., Jarrar, M.: Data modelling versus ontology engineering. SIGMOD Record Special Issue 31 (4), 12–17 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Stamper, R.: Signs, information, norms and systems. In: Holmqvist, B., Andersen, P., Klein, H., Posner, R. (eds.) Signs at Work: Semiosis and Information Processing in Organisations, De Gruyter, Berlin (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tan, P., Steinbach, M., Kumar, V.: Introduction to Data Mining. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Trog, D., Tang, Y., Meersman, R.: Towards ontological commitments with Ω-ridl markup language. In: Paschke, A., Biletskiy, Y. (eds.) RuleML 2007. LNCS, vol. 4824, pp. 92–106. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Trog, D., Vereecken, J., Christiaens, S., Leenheer, P.D., Meersman, R.: T-lex: A role-based ontology engineering tool. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z., Herrero, P. (eds.) OTM 2006 Workshops. LNCS, vol. 4278, pp. 1191–1200. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Uschold, M., King, M.: Towards a methodology for building ontologies. In: Workshop on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge Sharing, held in conjunction with IJCAI 1995 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Uschold, M., Healy, M., Williamson, K., Clark, P., Woods, S.: Ontology reuse and application. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems(FOIS 1998), pp. 179–192. IOS Press, Amsterdam (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zhao, G., Meersman, R.: Architecting ontology for scalability and versatility. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) OTM 2005. LNCS, vol. 3761, pp. 1605–1614. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Semantic Technology and Application Research Laboratory (STARLab), Department of Computer Science, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, B-1050, Brussels, Belgium

    Christophe Debruyne, Pieter De Leenheer & Robert Meersman

Authors
  1. Christophe Debruyne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pieter De Leenheer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Robert Meersman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. STARLab, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Bldg G/10, Pleinlaan 2, 1050, Brussels, Belgium

    Robert Meersman

  2. DEBII - CBS, De Laeter Way, Curtin University of Technology, 6102, Bentley, WA, Australia

    Tharam Dillon

  3. Facultad de Informática, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, , , , ,, Campus de Montegancedo S/N, Boadilla del Monte, 28660, Madrid, Spain

    Pilar Herrero

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Debruyne, C., De Leenheer, P., Meersman, R. (2009). A Method and Tool for Fact Type Reuse in the DOGMA Ontology Framework. In: Meersman, R., Dillon, T., Herrero, P. (eds) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2009. OTM 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5871. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-05151-7_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-05151-7_29

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-05150-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-05151-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation