Abstract
In reading mammograms, radiologists judge for the presence of a lesion by comparing at least two breast projections (views) as a lesion is to be observed in both of them. Most computer-aided detection (CAD) systems, on the other hand, treat single views independently and thus they fail to account for the interaction between the breast views. Following the radiologist’s practice, in this paper, we develop a Bayesian network framework for automatic multi-view mammographic analysis based on causal independence models and the regions detected as suspicious by a single-view CAD system. We have implemented two versions of the framework based on different definitions of multi-view correspondences. The proposed approach is evaluated and compared against the single-view CAD system in an experimental study with real-life data. The results show that using expert knowledge helps to increase the cancer detection rate at a patient level.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Good, W., Zheng, B., Chang, Y., Wang, X., Maitz, G., Gur, D.: Multi-image cad employing features derived from ipsilateral mammographic views. Proceedings of SPIE, Medical Imaging 3661, 474–485 (1999)
van Engeland, S., Timp, S., Karssemeijer, N.: Finding corresponding regions of interest in mediolateral oblique and craniocaudal mammographic views. Medical Physics 33(9), 3203–3212 (2006)
van Engeland, S., Karssemeijer, N.: Combining two mammographic projections in a computer aided mass detection method. Medical Physics 34(3), 898–905 (2007)
Paquerault, S., Petrick, N., Chan, H., Sahiner, B., Helvie, M.A.: Improvement of computerized mass detection on mammograms: Fusion of two-view information. Medical Physics 29(2), 238–247 (2002)
Velikova, M., de Carvalho Ferreira, N., Lucas, P.: Bayesian network decomposition for modeling breast cancer detection. In: Bellazzi, R., Abu-Hanna, A., Hunter, J. (eds.) AIME 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4594. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Jensen, F.V., Nielsen, T.D.: Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Heckerman, D., Breese, J.S.: Causal independence for probability assessment and inference using Bayesian networks. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A 26(6), 826–831 (1996)
Lucas, P.J.F.: Bayesian network modelling through qualitative pattern. Artificial Intelligence 163, 233–263 (2005)
Diez, F.: Parameter adjustment in Bayes networks: The generalized noisy or-gate. In: Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on UAI, San Francisco, CA (1993)
Murphy, K.: Bayesian Network Toolbox (BNT), http://www.cs.ubc.ca/~murphyk/Software/BNT/bnt.html
Dempster, A., Laird, N., Rubin, D.: Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Stat. Soc., Series B 39(1), 1–38 (1977)
Hanley, J.A., McNeil, B.J.: The meaning and use of the area under a Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143, 29–36 (1982)
Metz, C.E.: Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiological ROC studies. Investigative Radiology 24, 234–245 (1988)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Velikova, M., Samulski, M., Karssemeijer, N., Lucas, P. (2008). Toward Expert Knowledge Representation for Automatic Breast Cancer Detection. In: Dochev, D., Pistore, M., Traverso, P. (eds) Artificial Intelligence: Methodology, Systems, and Applications. AIMSA 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5253. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85776-1_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85776-1_28
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-85775-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-85776-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)