An Assessment of the Currency of Free Science Information on the Web

1. Michael, K.B.: The Deep Web: Surfacing Hidden Value. The Journal of Electronic Publishing, 7, 1 (2001), available at: http://www.press.umich.edu/jep/07-01/bergman.html

2. OCLC. Five-year Information Format Trends (2003), available at: http://www5.oclc.org/downloads/community/informationtrends.pdf

3. Franz, B.: The Role of the Internet in Informal Scholarly Communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57(10), 1350–1367 (2006)

   Article  Google Scholar 

4. Kate, W., et al.: EPIC Online Use and Costs Evaluation Program (2004), available at: http://www.epic.columbia.edu/eval/eval04frame.html

5. Athina, T., et al.: Important Drug Safety Information on the Internet: Assessing its Accuracy and Reliability. Drug Safety 26(7), 519–527 (2003) (5a, 5b, 5c)

   Article  Google Scholar 

6. Diederik, G., et al.: Comparison of Search Strategies and Quality of Medical Information of the Internet: A Study Relating to Ankle Sprain. Injury, Int. J. Care Injured 32, 473–476 (2001)

   Google Scholar 

7. Gunther, E., Thomas, L.D.: Towards Quality Management of Medical Information on the Internet: Evaluation. Labeling, and Filtering of Information. BMJ 317, 1496–1502 (1998)

   Google Scholar 

8. Shirlee-ann, K., Janice, B.: Developing a Framework for Assessing Information Quality on the World Wide Web. Journal of Information Science 8, 159–172 (2005)

   Google Scholar 

9. Carmine, S., Stephen, B.: Towards a Weighted Average Framework for Evaluating the Quality of Web-located Health Information. Journal of Information Science 31, 260–272 (2005)

   Article  Google Scholar 

10. Fogg, B.J., et al.: Stanford-Makovsky Web Credibility Study 2002: Investigating What Makes Web Sites Credible Today (2002), available at: http://captology.stanford.edu/pdf/Stanford-MakovskyWebCredStudy2002-prelim.pdf

11. Princeton Survey Research Associates. A Matter of Trust: What Users Want from Web Sites (2002), available at: http://www.consumerwebwatch.org/pdfs/a-matter-of-trust.pdf

12. California State University, Sacramento. Evaluating Internet Sources (2003), available at: http://library.csus.edu/services/inst/ICCS/infocomp/tutorials/module5/web/timeliness/index.htm

13. Cornell University Library. Critically Analyzing Information Sources (2004), available at: http://www.library.cornell.edu/olinuris/ref/research/skill26.htm

14. Stapleton, P.: Assessing the Quality and Bias of Web-based Sources: Implications for Academic Writing. Journal of English for Academic Purpose 2, 229–245 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

15. Elmer, V.B., Dawn, M.S., Muhammad, W.: Instruments to Assess the Quality of Health Information on the World Wide Web: What can Our Patients Actually Use? International Journal of Medical Informatics 74, 13–19 (2005) (15a, 15b, 15c)

    Article  Google Scholar 

16. Carmine, S., Stephen, B.: Towards a Weighted Average Framework for Evaluating the Quality of Web-located Health Information. Journal of Information Science 31(4), 260–272 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

17. Laura, O.G.: Future Directions for Depicting Credibility in Health Care Web Sites. International Journal of Medical Informatics 75, 58–65 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

18. Jürgen, S., et al.: Health Care Providers on the World Wide Web: Quality of Presentations of Surgical Departments in Germany. Med. Inform., 26(1), 17–24 (2001) (18a, 18b, 18c, 18d)

    Article  Google Scholar 

19. Peter, C.B., David, F.P.: Prostate Cancer on the Internet—Information or Misinformation? The Journal of Urology 175(5), 1836–1842 (2006) (19a, 19b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

20. Young, N., Barbara, A.A.: Analysis of Governmental Web Sites on Food Safety Issues: A Global Perspective. Journal of Environmental Health 69(5), 10–15 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

21. Wang, Y., Liu, Z.: Automatic Detecting Indicators for Quality of Health Information on the Web. International Journal of Medical Informatics 4, 1–8 (2006) (21a, 21b)

    Google Scholar 

22. Matthew, W.B.: Information Quality: A Conceptual Framework and Empirical Validation [D]. The University of Kansas , 102–103 (2004) (22a, 22b)

    Google Scholar 

23. Gunther, E., et al.: Empirical Studies Assessing the Quality of Health Information for Consumers on the World Wide Web: A Systematic Review. JAMA 287(20), 2691–2700 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

24. Environmental Education and Training Partnership. Evaluating the Content of Web Sites: Guidelines for Educators (1999), (24a, 24b) available at: http://www.epa.gov/enviroed/pdf/evalwebsites.pdf

25. The library of Congress. National Digital Information Infrastructure and Preservation Program, available at: http://www.digitalpreservation.gov/importance/

26. Peter, S., Peter, Z., Mark, K.P.: The Internet and Patient Education — Resources and their Reliability: Focus on a Select Urologic Topic. Adult Urology 53(6), 1117–1120 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

27. Meric, F., et al.: Breast Cancer on the World Wide Web: Cross Sectional Survey of Quality of Information and Popularity of Web Sites. BMJ 324, 577–581 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

28. Eysenbach, G., Kohler, C.: How do Consumers Search for and Appraise Health Information on the World Wide Web? Qualitative Study Using Focus Groups. Usability Tests, and In-depth Interviews, BMJ 324, 573–577 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references