Determining Practice Achievement in Project Management Using a Two-Phase Questionnaire on Small and Medium Enterprises

1. Bach, J.: Enough about process: what we need are heroes. IEEE Software 12(2), 96–98 (1995)

   Article  Google Scholar 

2. Brewerton, P.: Organizational research methods. SAGE, London (2001)

   Google Scholar 

3. Brock, S., Hendricks, D., Linnell, S., Smith, D.: A Balanced Approach to IT Project Management. In: Proceedings of SAICSIT, ACM Publications, New York (2003)

   Google Scholar 

4. Brodman, J., Johnson, D.: Project Planning: Disaster Insurance for Small Software Projects. In: Proceedings from SEPG 2000: Ways to Make Better Software, March 20-23, 1999, LOGOS International, Inc., Seattle, Washington (1999)

   Google Scholar 

5. Calvo-Manzano, J.A., Cuevas, G., San-Feliu, T., De-Amescua, A., Arcilla, M.M., Cerrada, J.A.: Lessons Learned in Software Process Improvement. The European Journal for the Informatics Professional IV(4), 26–29 (2003)

   Google Scholar 

6. Calvo-Manzano, J.A., Cuevas, G., San-Feliu, T., De-Amescua, A., García, L., Pérez, M.: Experiences in the Application of Software Process Improvement in SMES. Software Quality Journal 10(3), 261–273 (2002)

   Article  Google Scholar 

7. Cairó, O.: Proyecto KAMET II. Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México (2004)

   Google Scholar 

8. Carreira, M., Román, I.: Estimación del Coste de la Calidad del Software a través de la Simulación del Proceso de Desarrollo. Revista Colombiana de Computación 2(1), 75–87 (2002)

   Google Scholar 

9. CMMI Interpretive Guidance Project: Preliminary Report (CMU/SEI-2003-SR-007): Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA (October 2003)

   Google Scholar 

10. SCuevas, G., Serrano, A., Serrano, A.: Assessment of the requirements management process using a two-stage questionnaire. In: QSIC 2004, Quality Software. Proceedings of Fourth International Conference on Software Quality (September 8-9, 2004)

    Google Scholar 

11. Dove, R.: Value Propositioning - Book One - Perception and Misperception in Decision Making. Iceni Books (2004)

    Google Scholar 

12. Dunaway, D.K., Masters, S.: CMM-Based Appraisal for Internal Process Improvement (CBA IPI). Method Description, Technical Report CMU/SEI-96-TR-007, Carnegie Mellon University, Software Engineering Institute, Pittsburgh (1996)

    Google Scholar 

13. Gillham, B.: Developing a Questionnaire. Developing a Questionnaire, London, New York (2000)

    Google Scholar 

14. Hadden, R.: Effective Planning and Tracking for Small Projects. In: SEPG Conference, Datatel, Inc. (2002)

    Google Scholar 

15. IBM: Gestión de Proyectos TIC en la Seguridad Social. Asociación Internacional de la Seguridad Social. Asociación Internacional de la Seguridad Social. Ginebra (2004)

    Google Scholar 

16. ISO/IEC 12207:2002/FDAM 2: Information Technology – Software Life Cycle Processes. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva (2004)

    Google Scholar 

17. ISO/IEC 155504-2:2003/Cor.1:2004(E): Information Technology – Process Assessment – Part 2: Performing an Assessment. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva (2004)

    Google Scholar 

18. ISO/IEC TR 15504:1998(E): Information Technology – Software Process Assessments. Parts 1-9. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva (1998)

    Google Scholar 

19. Jones, C.: Why Flawed Software Projects Are Not Cancelled in Time. Cutter IT Journal 16(12), 12–17 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

20. Jones, G.: Software Engineering. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY (1990)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

21. McFeeley, B.: IDEAL: A User’s Guide for Software Process Improvement. Handbook, CMU/SEI-96-HB-001, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University (February 1996), http://www.sei.cmu.edu/pub/documents/96.reports/pdf/hb001.96.pdf

22. Marciniak, J.J., Sadauskas, T.: Use of Questionnaire-Based Appraisals in Process Improvement Programs. In: Proceedings of the Second Annual Conference on the Acquisition of Software-Intensive Systems, Arlington, Virginia, USA, p. 22 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

23. Members of the Assessment Method Integrated Team: Standard CMMI® Appraisal Method for Process Improvement (SCAMPI), Version 1.1, (CMU/SEI-2001-HB-001). Pittsburgh, PA, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University (December 2001) (2006), Descripción técnica disponible en: http://ww.sei.cmu.edu/pub/documents/01.reports/pdf/01hb001.pdf

24. Mondragón, O.: Addressing Infrastructure Issues in Very Small Settings. In: Proceedings of the First International Research Workshop for Process Improvement in Small Settings, CMU/SEI-2006-SR-001, pp. 5–10 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

25. Oktaba, H.: MoProSoft: A Software Process Model for Small Enterprises. In: Proceedings of the First International Research Workshop for Process Improvement in Small Settings, CMU/SEI-2006-SR-001, pp. 93–100 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

26. Pino, F., García, F., Piattini, M.: Revisión Sistemática de Procesos Software en Micros, Pequeñas y Medianas Empresas. Revista Española de Innovación, Calidad e Ingeniería del Software 2(1), 6–23 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

27. Pressman, R.S.: Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 5th edn. European Adaptation, McGraw-Hill, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

28. Programa para el Desarrollo de la Industria Software (ProSoft): Avances al 1er semestre del 2004. Portal de la Industria del Software. Disponible en: www.software.net.mx

29. Software Engineering Institute: CMMI for Development (CMMI-DEV, V1.2). CMU/SEI-2006 TR-008, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University (2006)

    Google Scholar 

30. Standish Group International: Extreme Chaos. The Standish Group International, Inc. (2001)

    Google Scholar 

31. Standish Group International: 2004 Third Quarter Research Report. The Standish Group International, Inc. (2004)

    Google Scholar 

32. Yamanishi, K., Li, H.: Mining Open Answers in Questionnaire Data. IEEE Intelligent Systems 17(5), 58–63 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

33. Zubrow, D., Hayes, W., Siegel, J., Goldenson, D.: Maturity Questionnaire (CMU/SEI-94-SR-7). Pittsburgh, PA, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University (June 1994) (1994), http://www.sei.cmu.edu/pub/documents/94.reports/pdf/sr07.94.pdf

Download references