[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

Compositional Temporal Fault Tree Analysis

  • Conference paper
Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security (SAFECOMP 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 4680))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

HiP-HOPS (Hierarchically-Performed Hazard Origin and Propaga-tion Studies) is a recent technique that partly automates Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) by constructing fault trees from system topologies annotated with component-level failure specifications. HiP-HOPS has hitherto created only classical combinatorial fault trees that fail to capture the often significant temporal ordering of failure events. In this paper, we propose temporal extensions to the fault tree notation that can elevate HiP-HOPS, and potentially other FTA techniques, above the classical combinatorial model of FTA. We develop the formal foundations of a new logic to represent event sequences in fault trees using Priority-AND, Simultaneous-AND, and Priority-OR gates, and present a set of temporal laws to identify logical contradictions and remove redundancies in temporal fault trees. By qualitatively analysing these temporal trees to obtain ordered minimal cut-sets, we show how these extensions to FTA can enhance the safety of dynamic systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 35.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 44.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Papadopoulos, Y.I., McDermid, J.A., Sasse, R., Heiner, G.: Analysis and Synthesis of the Behaviour of Complex Systems in Conditions of Failure. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 71(3), 229–247 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Grunske, L., Kaiser, B.: Automatic Generation of Analyzable Failure Propagation Models from Component-Level Failure Annotations. In: Fifth International Conference on Quality Software (QSIC 2005), pp. 117–123. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Walker, M.D., Papadopoulos, Y.I.: Pandora: The Time of Priority-AND gates. In: INCOM 2006, France, pp. 237–242 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fussel, J.B., Aber, E.F., Rahl, R.G.: On quantitative analysis of PAND failure logic. IEEE Trans. on Reliability R-25/5, 324–326 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Vesely, W.E., Goldberg, F.F., Roberts, N.H., Haasl, D.F.: Fault Tree Handbook. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington D.C., USA (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Long, W., Sato, Y., Horigome, M.: Quantification of sequential failure logic for fault tree analysis. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 67, 269–274 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Vesely, W.E., Stamatelatos, M., Dugan, J.B., Fragola, J., Minarick, J., Railsback, J.: Fault Tree Handbook with Aerospace Applications. NASA Office of Safety and Mission Assurance, USA (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tang, Z., Dugan, J.B.: Minimal cut set/sequence generation for dynamic fault trees. In: Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium Proceedings (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Palshikar, G.K.: Temporal Fault Trees. Information and Software Technology 44, 137–150 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wijayarathna, P.G., Kawata, Y., Santosa, A., Isogai, K.: Representing relative temporal knowledge with the tand connective. Eighth Ireland Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AI 1997) 2, 80–87 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Andrews, J.D.: To not or not to not. In: Proceedings of the 18th International System Safety Conference, Fort Worth, September 2000, pp. 267–275 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gorski, J., Wardzinski, A.: Deriving Real-Time Requirements for Software from Safety Analysis. In: Proc. 8th Euromicro Workshop on Real-Time Systems, pp. 9–14. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hansen, K.M., Ravn, A.P.: From Safety Analysis to Software Requirements. IEEE Trans. on Software Engineering 24(7), 573–584 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Francesca Saglietti Norbert Oster

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Walker, M., Bottaci, L., Papadopoulos, Y. (2007). Compositional Temporal Fault Tree Analysis. In: Saglietti, F., Oster, N. (eds) Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security. SAFECOMP 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4680. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75101-4_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75101-4_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-75100-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-75101-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics