[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

Are Younger People More Difficult to Identify or Just a Peer-to-Peer Effect

  • Conference paper
Computer Analysis of Images and Patterns (CAIP 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 4673))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Recent investigations into the effect of age on face identification concluded that it was more difficult to identify younger people than older ones. The identification rates of the different age groups were, however, not measured under identical conditions. There was a significantly higher percentage of younger people in all the face image samples. We found that a person from any age group will find that they look more similar to another person from the same age group, as opposed to someone from another age group. The experiments we carried out using samples that have an evenly distributed age range did not show a statistically significant difference between the sample age groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 103.50
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 129.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ho, W.H., Watters, P.: Ecological validity of face recognition research. In: The workshop of 2005 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Security, pp. 212– 217 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Phillips, P.J., Grother, P., Micheals, R.J., Blackburn, D.M., Tabassi, E., Bone, M.: Face recognition vendor test 2002 evaluation report. Technical report, FRVT (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Given, G., Beveridge, J.R., Draper, B.A., Grother, P., Phillips, P.: How features of the human face affect recognition: a statistical comparison of three face recognition algorithms. In: Proceedings of the CVPR (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ricanek Jr., K., Tesafaye, T.: Morph: A longitudinal image database of normal adult age-progression. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Phillips, P., Wechsler, H., Huang, J., Rauss, P.: The feret database and evaluation procedure for face recognition algorithms. Image and Vision Computing Journal 16, 295–306 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. The csu face identification evaluation system, version 5.0. Technical report (Colorado State University)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ho, W.H., Watters, P., Verity, D.: Robustness of the new owner-tester approach for face identification experiments. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Workshop on Biometrics, in association with CVPR (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Phillips, P., Moon, H., Rizvi, S., Rauss, P.J.: The feret evaluation methodology for face recognition algorithms. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 22, 1090–1104 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Howell, D.C.: Fundamental Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. Duxbury Press, Boston, Massachusetts (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Efron, B., Tibshirani, R.: An Introduction to the Bootstrap. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, USA (1998)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Walter G. Kropatsch Martin Kampel Allan Hanbury

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ho, W.H., Watters, P., Verity, D. (2007). Are Younger People More Difficult to Identify or Just a Peer-to-Peer Effect. In: Kropatsch, W.G., Kampel, M., Hanbury, A. (eds) Computer Analysis of Images and Patterns. CAIP 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4673. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74272-2_44

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74272-2_44

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-74271-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-74272-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics