[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

Semantic Web Reasoning Tutoring Agent

  • Conference paper
Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 5091))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 3427 Accesses

Abstract

This paper proposes a proof theoretic approach to check conflicts between the arguments derived from the ontologies of learning resources. Two types of arguments that can arise in a situation where a learner encounters conflicting viewpoints about a topic are identified, namely syllogistic arguments and arguments about the set of necessary and sufficient conditions that represent a concept. A method based on set equations is applied to create Syllogistic arguments from ontologies. The taxonomic associations of concepts in Ontologies, can be converted to categorical statements giving rise to syllogisms. We also consider arguments about the necessary and sufficient features for the representation of concepts and show that they can be handled in a very similar way as syllogistic arguments. The approach can be applied by a pedagogical agent in an interactive learning environment in order to identify, discuss differences in conceptualizations and check the validity of claims of different resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hameed, A., Sleeman, D., Preece, A.: Detecting mismatches among experts ontologies acquired through knowledge elicitation. Knowledge-Based Systems 15, 265–273 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ravenscroft, A.: Designing argumentation for conceptual development. Computers and Education 34, 241–255 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. McAlister, S., Ravenscroft, A., Scalon, E.: Combining interaction and context design to support collaborative argumentation using a tool forsynchronouscmc. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 20(3), 194–204 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hartley, J.R.: Qualidative reasoning and conceptual change: Computer based support in understanding science. Interactive Learning Environments 5, 53–64 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Walton, D.: Foundamentals of Critical Argumentation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bennett, B.: Logical Representations for Automated Reasoning about Spatial Relationships. PhD thesis, School of Computer Studies, The University of Leeds (1997)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Beverley P. Woolf Esma Aïmeur Roger Nkambou Susanne Lajoie

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Panayiotou, C., Bennett, B. (2008). Semantic Web Reasoning Tutoring Agent. In: Woolf, B.P., Aïmeur, E., Nkambou, R., Lajoie, S. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5091. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69132-7_117

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69132-7_117

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-69130-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69132-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics