Abstract
Recognition of peer learning as a valuable supplement to formal education has lead to a rich literature formalising peer learning as an institutional resource. Facilitating peer learning support sessions alone however, without providing guidance or context, risks being ineffective in terms of any targeted, measurable effects on learning. Building on an existing open-source, student-facing platform called RiPPLE, which recommends peer study sessions based on the availability, competencies and compatibility of learners, this paper aims to supplement these study sessions by providing content from a repository of multiple-choice questions to facilitate topical discussion and aid productiveness. We exploit a knowledge tracing algorithm alongside a simple Gaussian scoring model to select questions that promote relevant learning and that reciprocally meet the expectations of both learners. Primary results using synthetic data indicate that the model works well at scale in terms of the number of sessions and number of items recommended, and capably recommends from a large repository the content that best approximates a proposed difficulty gradient.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Evaluated as the probability that a random score under a standard normal distribution is greater than the midpoint between two sequential items, (\(\frac{d}{2}\)).
References
Baker, R.S.J., Corbett, A.T., Aleven, V.: More accurate student modeling through contextual estimation of slip and guess probabilities in bayesian knowledge tracing. In: Woolf, B.P., Aïmeur, E., Nkambou, R., Lajoie, S. (eds.) ITS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5091, pp. 406–415. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69132-7_44
Cen, H., Koedinger, K., Junker, B.: Learning factors analysis – a general method for cognitive model evaluation and improvement. In: Ikeda, M., Ashley, K.D., Chan, T.-W. (eds.) ITS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4053, pp. 164–175. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11774303_17
Conole, G.: Review of Pedagogical Models and Their Use in e-Learning. Open University, Milton Keynes (2010)
Corbett, A.: Cognitive computer tutors: solving the two-sigma problem. In: Bauer, M., Gmytrasiewicz, P.J., Vassileva, J. (eds.) UM 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2109, pp. 137–147. Springer, Heidelberg (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44566-8_14
Corbett, A.T., Anderson, J.R.: Knowledge tracing: modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge. User Model. User-Adap. Inter. 4(4), 253–278 (1994)
Dawson, S.: A study of the relationship between student communication interaction and sense of community. Internet High. Educ. 9(3), 153–162 (2006)
Drasgow, F., Hulin, C.L.: Item response theory (1990)
Goldschmid, B., Goldschmid, M.L.: Peer teaching in higher education: a review. High. Educ. 5(1), 9–33 (1976)
Guy, I.: Social recommender systems. In: Ricci, F., Rokach, L., Shapira, B. (eds.) Recommender Systems Handbook, pp. 511–543. Springer, Boston, MA (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7637-6_15
Hong, W., Zheng, S., Wang, H., Shi, J.: A job recommender system based on user clustering. J. Comput. 8(8), 1960–1967 (2013)
Khajah, M.M., Huang, Y., González-Brenes, J.P., Mozer, M.C., Brusilovsky, P.: Integrating knowledge tracing and item response theory: A tale of two frameworks. In: Proceedings of Workshop on Personalization Approaches in Learning Environments (PALE 2014) at the 22th International Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization, pp. 7–12. University of Pittsburgh (2014)
Khosravi, H.: Recommendation in personalised peer-learning environments. arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.03077 (2017)
Khosravi, H., Cooper, K., Kitto, K.: Riple: recommendation in peer-learning environments based on knowledge gaps and interests. JEDM-J. Educ. Data Min. 9(1), 42–67 (2017)
Lemire, D., Boley, H., McGrath, S., Ball, M.: Collaborative filtering and inference rules for context-aware learning object recommendation. Interact. Technol. Smart Educ. 2(3), 179–188 (2005)
Mangina, E., Kilbride, J.: Evaluation of keyphrase extraction algorithm and tiling process for a document/resource recommender within e-learning environments. Comput. Educ. 50(3), 807–820 (2008)
van der Meer, J., Scott, C.: Students experiences and perceptions of peer assisted study sessions: towards ongoing improvement. J. Peer Learn. 2(1), 3–22 (2009)
Newcomb, T.: A conversation with theodore newcomb. Psychol. Today, 73–80 (1974)
Pardos, Z., Heffernan, N.: Kt-idem: introducing item difficulty to the knowledge tracing model. In: User Modeling, Adaption and Personalization, pp. 243–254 (2011)
Pavlik Jr., P.I., Cen, H., Koedinger, K.R.: Performance factors analysis-a new alternative to knowledge tracing. Online Submission (2009)
Piech, C., Bassen, J., Huang, J., Ganguli, S., Sahami, M., Guibas, L.J., Sohl-Dickstein, J.: Deep knowledge tracing. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 505–513 (2015)
Pizzato, L., Rej, T., Akehurst, J., Koprinska, I., Yacef, K., Kay, J.: Recommending people to people: the nature of reciprocal recommenders with a case study in online dating. User Model. User-Adap. Inter. 23(5), 447–488 (2013)
Pizzato, L., Rej, T., Chung, T., Yacef, K., Koprinska, I., Kay, J.: Reciprocal recommenders. In: 8th Workshop on Intelligent Techniques for Web Personalization and Recommender Systems, UMAP (2010)
Potts, B., Khosravi, H., Reidsema, C., Bakharia, A., Belonogoff, M., Fleming, M.: Reciprocal peer recommendation for learning purposes. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (2018)
Ross, M.T., Cameron, H.S.: Peer assisted learning: a planning and implementation framework: amee guide no. 30. Med. Teach. 29(6), 527–545 (2007)
Sha, L., Hong, P.: Neural knowledge tracing. Brain Function Assessment in Learning. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10512, pp. 108–117. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67615-9_10
Thai-Nghe, N., Drumond, L., Horváth, T., Krohn-Grimberghe, A., Nanopoulos, A., Schmidt-Thieme, L.: Factorization techniques for predicting student performance. In: Educational Recommender Systems and Technologies: Practices and Challenges, pp. 129–153 (2011)
Van Der Heijden, B., Boon, J., Van der Klink, M., Meijs, E.: Employability enhancement through formal and informal learning: an empirical study among dutch non-academic university staff members. Int. J. Training Dev. 13(1), 19–37 (2009)
Vygotsky, L.S.: Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1980)
Yudelson, M.V., Koedinger, K.R., Gordon, G.J.: Individualized bayesian knowledge tracing models. In: Lane, H.C., Yacef, K., Mostow, J., Pavlik, P. (eds.) AIED 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7926, pp. 171–180. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39112-5_18
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this paper
Cite this paper
Potts, B.A., Khosravi, H., Reidsema, C. (2018). Reciprocal Content Recommendation for Peer Learning Study Sessions. In: Penstein Rosé, C., et al. Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10947. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93843-1_34
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93843-1_34
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93842-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93843-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)