[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

Formalisation of SysML/KAOS Goal Assignments with B System Component Decompositions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Integrated Formal Methods (IFM 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 11023))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The use of formal methods for verification and validation of critical and complex systems is important, but can be extremely tedious without modularisation mechanisms. SysML/KAOS is a requirements engineering method. It includes a goal modeling language to model requirements from stakeholder’s needs. It also contains a domain modeling language for the representation of system application domain using ontologies. Translation rules have been defined to automatically map SysML/KAOS models into B System specifications. Moreover, since the systems we are interested in naturally break down into subsystems (enabling the distribution of work between several agents: hardware, software and human), SysML/KAOS goal models allow the capture of assignments of requirements to agents responsible of their achievement. Each agent is associated with a subsystem. The contribution of this paper is an approach to ensure that a requirement assigned to a subsystem is well achieved by the subsystem. A particular emphasis is placed on ensuring that system invariants persist in subsystems specifications.

French National Research Agency (ANR).

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 35.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 44.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    See [13, 37] for assessment case studies.

  2. 2.

    The before-after predicate of \(E_1\) denotes the relationship holding between the state variable of machine \(M_1\) just before (denoted by \(x_1\)) and after (denoted by \(x_1'\)) the triggering of \(E_1\) [2].

  3. 3.

    For an event G, G_Guard represents the guard of G and G_Post represents the post condition of its actions [24].

References

  1. Abrial, J.R.: The B-Book: Assigning Programs to Meanings. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Abrial, J.: Modeling in Event-B - System and Software Engineering. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Abrial, J.R., Hallerstede, S.: Refinement, decomposition, and instantiation of discrete models: application to Event-B. Fundamenta Informaticae 77(1–2), 1–28 (2007)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Alur, R., Henzinger, T.A., Kupferman, O.: Alternating-time temporal logic. J. ACM (JACM) 49(5), 672–713 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. ANR-14-CE28-0009: Formose ANR project (2017). http://formose.lacl.fr/

  6. Bauer, J.C.: Specification for a software program for a boiler water content monitor and control system. Institute of Risk Research, University of Waterloo (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Butler, M.: Synchronisation-based decomposition for Event-B. RODIN Deliverable D19 Intermediate report on methodology, pp. 47–57 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Butler, M.: An approach to the design of distributed systems with B AMN. In: Bowen, J.P., Hinchey, M.G., Till, D. (eds.) ZUM 1997. LNCS, vol. 1212, pp. 221–241. Springer, Heidelberg (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0027291

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Butler, M., Jones, C.B., Romanovsky, A., Troubitsyna, E. (eds.): Rigorous Development of Complex Fault-Tolerant Systems. LNCS, vol. 4157. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11916246

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Claassen, A.F., Lathon, R.D., Rochowiak, D.M., Interrante, L.D.: Active rescheduling for goal maintenance in dynamic manufacturing-systems. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  11. ClearSy: Atelier B: B System (2014). http://clearsy.com/

  12. Davis, W.J.: Evaluating performance of distributed intelligent control systems. NIST Special Publication SP, pp. 225–232 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tueno Fotso, S.J., Frappier, M., Laleau, R., Mammar, A.: Modeling the hybrid ERTMS/ETCS level 3 standard using a formal requirements engineering approach. In: Butler, M., Raschke, A., Hoang, T.S., Reichl, K. (eds.) ABZ 2018. LNCS, vol. 10817, pp. 262–276. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91271-4_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Tueno Fotso, S.J., Mammar, A., Laleau, R., Frappier, M.: Event-B expression and verification of translation rules between SysML/KAOS domain models and B system specifications. In: Butler, M., Raschke, A., Hoang, T.S., Reichl, K. (eds.) ABZ 2018. LNCS, vol. 10817, pp. 55–70. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91271-4_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Goranko, V.: Coalition games and alternating temporal logics. In: Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, pp. 259–272. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hause, M., et al.: The SysML modelling language. In: Fifteenth European Systems Engineering Conference, vol. 9. Citeseer (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Van der Hoek, W., Wooldridge, M.: Multi-agent systems. Found. Artif. Intell. 3, 887–928 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Iliasov, A., et al.: Supporting reuse in Event B development: modularisation approach. In: Frappier, M., Glässer, U., Khurshid, S., Laleau, R., Reeves, S. (eds.) ABZ 2010. LNCS, vol. 5977, pp. 174–188. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11811-1_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Laleau, R., Semmak, F., Matoussi, A., Petit, D., Hammad, A., Tatibouet, B.: A first attempt to combine SysML requirements diagrams and B. Innov. Syst. Softw. Eng. 6(1–2), 47–54 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. van Lamsweerde, A.: Requirements Engineering - From System Goals to UML Models to Software Specifications. Wiley (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lecomte, T., Deharbe, D., Prun, E., Mottin, E.: Applying a formal method in industry: a 25-year trajectory. In: Cavalheiro, S., Fiadeiro, J. (eds.) SBMF 2017. LNCS, vol. 10623, pp. 70–87. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70848-5_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Mammar, A., Laleau, R.: On the use of domain and system knowledge modeling in goal-based Event-B specifications. In: Margaria, T., Steffen, B. (eds.) ISoLA 2016. LNCS, vol. 9952, pp. 325–339. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47166-2_23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Matoussi, A.: Building abstract formal Specifications driven by goals. Ph.D. thesis, University of Paris-Est, France (2011). https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00680736

  24. Matoussi, A., Gervais, F., Laleau, R.: A goal-based approach to guide the design of an abstract Event-B specification. In: ICECCS 2011, pp. 139–148. IEEE Computer Society

    Google Scholar 

  25. Openflexo: Openflexo project (2018). https://github.com/openflexo-team/

  26. Parnas, D.L., Madey, J.: Functional documents for computer systems. Sci. Comput. Program. 25(1), 41–61 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Pierra, G.: The PLIB ontology-based approach to data integration. In: Jacquart, R. (ed.) Building the Information Society. IIFIP, vol. 156, pp. 13–18. Springer, Boston, MA (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8157-6_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Sengupta, K., Hitzler, P.: Web ontology language (OWL). In: Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining, pp. 2374–2378 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Silva, R.: Towards the composition of specifications in Event-B. Electron. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci. 280, 81–93 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Silva, R., Butler, M.J.: Shared event composition/decomposition in Event-B. In: Aichernig, B.K., de Boer, F.S., Bonsangue, M.M. (eds.) FMCO 2010. LNCS, vol. 6957, pp. 122–141. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25271-6_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Silva, R., Pascal, C., Hoang, T.S., Butler, M.J.: Decomposition tool for Event-B. Softw. Pract. Exper. 41(2), 199–208 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Suski, G., et al.: The nova control system-goals, architecture, and system design. In: Distributed Computer Control Systems 1982, pp. 45–56. Elsevier (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Tan, J.K.: Health management information systems: methods and practical applications. Jones & Bartlett Learning (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Tueno, S., Laleau, R., Mammar, A., Frappier, M.: Towards using ontologies for domain modeling within the SysML/KAOS approach. In: RE Workshops, pp. 1–5. IEEE Computer Society (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Tueno, S., Laleau, R., Mammar, A., Frappier, M.: Formal Representation of SysML/KAOS Domain Models. ArXiv e-prints, cs.SE, 1712.07406, December 2017. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1712.07406.pdf

  36. Tueno, S., Laleau, R., Mammar, A., Frappier, M.: The SysML/KAOS Domain Modeling Approach. ArXiv e-prints, cs.SE, 1710.00903, September 2017. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.00903.pdf

  37. Tueno, S., Laleau, R., Mammar, A., Frappier, M.: The SysML/KAOS Domain Modeling Language (Tool and Case Studies) (2017). https://github.com/stuenofotso/SysML_KAOS_Domain_Model_Parser/tree/master

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work is carried out within the framework of the FORMOSE project [5] funded by the French National Research Agency (ANR). It is also partly supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steve Jeffrey Tueno Fotso .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Tueno Fotso, S.J., Frappier, M., Laleau, R., Mammar, A., Leuschel, M. (2018). Formalisation of SysML/KAOS Goal Assignments with B System Component Decompositions. In: Furia, C., Winter, K. (eds) Integrated Formal Methods. IFM 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11023. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98938-9_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98938-9_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98937-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98938-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics