Semantically Meaningful Cohorts Enable Specialized Knowledge Sharing in a Collaborative MOOC

1. Cobo, G., et al.: Using agglomerative hierarchical clustering to model learner participation profiles in online discussion forums. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, pp. 248–251. ACM (2012)

   Google Scholar 

2. Dmoshinskaia, N.: Dropout prediction in MOOCs: using sentiment analysis of users’ comments to predict engagement. Master’s thesis, University of Twente (2016)

   Google Scholar 

3. Dubosson, M., Emad, S.: The forum community, the connectivist element of an xmooc. Univ. J. Educ. Res. 3(10), 680–690 (2015)

   Article  Google Scholar 

4. Fancsali, S.: Variable construction and causal modeling of online education messaging data: initial results. In: Educational Data Mining 2011. Citeseer (2010)

   Google Scholar 

5. Håklev, S., Sharma, K., Slotta, J., Dillenbourg, P.: Contextualizing the co-creation of artefacts within the nested social structure of a collaborative MOOC. In: Lavoué, É., Drachsler, H., Verbert, K., Broisin, J., Pérez-Sanagustín, M. (eds.) EC-TEL 2017. LNCS, vol. 10474, pp. 67–81. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66610-5_6

   Chapter  Google Scholar 

6. Håklev, S., Slotta, J.D.: A principled approach to the design of collaborative MOOC curricula. In: Delgado Kloos, C., Jermann, P., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Seaton, D.T., White, S. (eds.) EMOOCs 2017. LNCS, vol. 10254, pp. 58–67. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59044-8_7

   Chapter  Google Scholar 

7. Joksimović, S., et al.: What do cMOOC participants talk about in social media?: A topic analysis of discourse in a cMOOC. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, LAK 2015, pp. 156–165. ACM, New York (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2723576.2723609

8. Joksimović, S., Manataki, A., Gasevic, D., Dawson, S., Kovanovic, V., De Kereki, I.F.: Translating network position into performance: importance of centrality in different network configurations. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge, pp. 314–323. ACM (2016)

   Google Scholar 

9. Khan, T.M., Clear, F., Sajadi, S.S.: The relationship between educational performance and online access routines: analysis of students’ access to an online discussion forum. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, pp. 226–229. ACM (2012)

   Google Scholar 

10. Kulkarni, C., Cambre, J., Kotturi, Y., Bernstein, M.S., Klemmer, S.: Talkabout: making distance matter with small groups in massive classes. In: Plattner, H., Meinel, C., Leifer, L. (eds.) Design Thinking Research. UI, pp. 67–92. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19641-1_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

11. Lopez, M.I., Luna, J., Romero, C., Ventura, S.: Classification via clustering for predicting final marks based on student participation in forums. In: International Educational Data Mining Society (2012)

    Google Scholar 

12. Mor, Y., Ferguson, R., Wasson, B.: Learning design, teacher inquiry into student learning and learning analytics: a call for action. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 46(2), 221–229 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

13. Najafi, H.: Transforming learning in science classrooms: a blended knowledge community approach. Ph.D. thesis, University of Toronto (2012)

    Google Scholar 

14. Peters, V.L., Slotta, J.D.: Analyzing collaborative knowledge construction in secondary school biology. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences, vol. 1, pp. 548–555. International Society of the Learning Sciences (2010)

    Google Scholar 

15. Peters, V.L., Slotta, J.D.: Scaffolding knowledge communities in the classroom: new opportunities in the web 2.0 era. In: Jacobson, M., Reimann, P. (eds.) Designs for Learning Environments of the Future, pp. 205–232. Springer, Boston (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-88279-6_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

16. Slotta, J.: Knowledge Community and Inquiry. Paper presented and published for the Network of Associated Programs in the Learning Sciences (NAPLES). Technical report (2014)

    Google Scholar 

17. Wang, Z., Anderson, T., Chen, L., Barbera, E.: Interaction pattern analysis in cMOOCs based on the connectivist interaction and engagement framework. Br. J. Educ. Tech. 48(2), 683–699 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

18. Wen, M., Maki, K., Wang, X., Dow, S., Herbsleb, J.D., Rose, C.P.: Transactivity as a predictor of future collaborative knowledge integration in team-based learning in online courses. In: EDM, pp. 533–538 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

19. Zhao, N., Najafi, H., Slotta, J.D.: An analysis of teacher-students interactions in three science classes: a pilot study. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Computer- Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, Hong Kong. International Society of the Learning Sciences (2011)

    Google Scholar 

20. Zheng, Z., Vogelsang, T., Pinkwart, N.: The impact of small learning group composition on student engagement and success in a mooc. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference of Educational Data Mining, pp. 500–503 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references