[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

Catching Corner Cases in Network Calculus – Flow Segregation Can Improve Accuracy

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Measurement, Modelling and Evaluation of Computing Systems (MMB 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 10740))

Abstract

Worst-case bounds on flow delays are essential for safety-critical systems. Deterministic network calculus is a methodology to compute such bounds. It is actively researched regarding its modeling capabilities as well as analysis accuracy and performance. We provide a contribution to the major part of the analysis: bounding the arrivals of cross flows. In particular, it has been believed that an aggregate view on cross flows outperforms deriving a bound for each cross flow individually. In contrast, we show that the so-called cross-flow segregation, can outperform the aggregation approach under certain conditions. We give a proof of concept, combine the alternative approaches into an analysis computing best bounds, and evaluate accuracy improvements as well as computational effort increases. To that end, we show that flows known to suffer from overly pessimistic delay bounds can see this pessimism reduced by double-digit percentages.

This work has been conducted at the Distributed Computer Systems (DISCO) Lab, TU Kaiserslautern, Germany, with support of a Carl Zeiss Foundation grant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 35.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 44.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bondorf, S.: Better bounds by worse assumptions - improving network calculus accuracy by adding pessimism to the network model. In: Proceedings of IEEE ICC (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bondorf, S., Nikolaus, P., Schmitt, J.B.: Quality and cost of deterministic network calculus - design and evaluation of an accurate and fast analysis. ACM POMACS 1(1), 16:1–16:34 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bondorf, S., Schmitt, J.B.: The DiscoDNC v2 - a comprehensive tool for deterministic network calculus. In: Proceedings of EAI ValueTools (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bondorf, S., Schmitt, J.B.: Boosting sensor network calculus by thoroughly bounding cross-traffic. In: Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bondorf, S., Schmitt, J.B.: Calculating accurate end-to-end delay bounds - You better know your cross-traffic. In: Proceedings of EAI ValueTools (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bondorf, S., Schmitt, J.B.: Improving cross-traffic bounds in feed-forward networks – there is a job for everyone. In: Remke, A., Haverkort, B.R. (eds.) MMB&DFT 2016. LNCS, vol. 9629, pp. 9–24. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31559-1_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Bondorf, S., Schmitt, J.B.: Should network calculus relocate? An assessment of current algebraic and optimization-based analyses. In: Agha, G., Van Houdt, B. (eds.) QEST 2016. LNCS, vol. 9826, pp. 207–223. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43425-4_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Bouillard, A.: Algorithms and efficiency of network calculus. Habilitation thesis, École Normale Supérieure (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bouillard, A., Jouhet, L., Thierry, E.: Tight performance bounds in the worst-case analysis of feed-forward networks. In: Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bu, T., Towsley, D.: On distinguishing between internet power law topology generators. In: Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chang, C.-S.: Performance Guarantees in Communication Networks. Springer, London (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0459-9

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Cruz, R.L.: A calculus for network delay, Part I: network elements in isolation. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 37(1), 114–131 (1991)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Cruz, R.L.: A calculus for network delay, Part II: network analysis. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 37(1), 132–141 (1991)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Kiefer, A., Gollan, N., Schmitt, J.B.: Searching for Tight Performance Bounds in Feed-Forward Networks. In: Müller-Clostermann, B., Echtle, K., Rathgeb, E.P. (eds.) MMB&DFT 2010. LNCS, vol. 5987, pp. 227–241. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12104-3_18

    Google Scholar 

  15. Le Boudec, J.-Y., Thiran, P. (eds.): Network Calculus: A Theory of Deterministic Queuing Systems for the Internet. LNCS, vol. 2050. Springer, Heidelberg (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45318-0

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Schmitt, J.B., Zdarsky, F.A., Fidler, M.: Delay bounds under arbitrary multiplexing: when network calculus leaves you in the lurch ... In: Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schmitt, J.B., Zdarsky, F.A., Martinovic, I.: Improving performance bounds in feed-forward networks by paying multiplexing only once. In: Proceedings of GI/ITG MMB (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steffen Bondorf .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bondorf, S., Nikolaus, P., Schmitt, J.B. (2018). Catching Corner Cases in Network Calculus – Flow Segregation Can Improve Accuracy. In: German, R., Hielscher, KS., Krieger, U. (eds) Measurement, Modelling and Evaluation of Computing Systems. MMB 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10740. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74947-1_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74947-1_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74946-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74947-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics