[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

Construction Costs Estimate for Civil Works. A Model for the Analysis During the Preliminary Stage of the Project

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2017 (ICCSA 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 10408))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2418 Accesses

Abstract

In order to estimate the cost of construction it is necessary to identify all the elements having expense and to provide the corresponding economic values accordingly to the level of detail of the project. Given the high number of variables characterizing the engineering project, it is required to have simplified schemes able to facilitate the study and management of the project. In particular, a civil work needs to have a concise representation through a suitable classification system, which allows to identify sets of homogeneous elements such that the complexity of the analysis is reduced. The classification systems commonly treated in literature are indeed based on the assumption that the building process can be broken down into simple elements able to give an efficient representation of the whole project.

In the present paper, we first analyze the main classification systems of civil works, highlighting features, advantages and problems. Then, starting from the classification system proposed in Italy by the UNI 8290 regulation, which has been implemented and extended to multiple levels of detail, it is defined a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) with the aim to be the reference for the description, the economic analysis and the management of the project already in the preliminary design stage and, later, also in its final planning stages and execution. Operationally, the decomposition of the project, aimed at identifying the processes needed to ensure the production of the work site, is the first step of the procedure, which is then followed by the quantification and the subsequent allocation of unit prices resulting from price lists. In these additional steps, we resort to semi-analytical estimation procedures, which allow us to draw up the Metric Computation (MC) and the Estimate Metric Computation (EMC) also in the preliminary design phase.

The use of a simplified base model for the decomposition of the project at the stage of preliminary analysis, can improve the accuracy of cost estimates, otherwise based on rough and often significantly approximate evaluations which follow from baseless estimates when compared to the macro-processing items. Increasing the accuracy of the cost estimates is of primarily interest as it can ensure higher margins of investments in the technical and economic feasibility of the project on the territory, which may cover the infrastructures, the urban planning, the implementation of new technologies for the environment and the rational use of the land. In this way, it is possible to reduce the risk associated to the project initiative, also allowing a unique decomposition scheme of the project. Such scheme, adopted since the preliminary study, can be then integrated through the following phases of the final and executive project.

The authors equally contributed to this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 35.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 44.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ashworth, A., Perera, S.: Cost Studies of Buildings. Routledge, London (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Galli, D., Gentile, D., Gualandi, V.P.: Appalti Pubblici. IPSOA, Milano (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Washington State Department of Transportation: Cost Estimating Manual for Project. WSDOT publications, USA (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Oberlender, G.D.: Project Management for Engineering and Construction. McGraw-Hill, New York (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  5. AACE International: Recommended Practice No. 18R-97, Cost Estimate Classification System – as Applied for the Building and General Construction Industries. AACE International, USA (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. AACE International: Recommended Practice No. 56R-08, Cost Estimate Classification System – as Applied for the Building and General Construction Industries. AACE International, USA (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Phaobunjong, K.: Parametric cost estimating model for conceptual cost estimating of building construction projects. Dissertation presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas, Austin (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Niazi, A., et al.: Product cost estimation: technique classification and methodology review. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 128(2), 563–575 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. USD (AT&L): Handbook: Construction Cost Estimating, Department of Defense, USA (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mislick, G.K., Nussbaum, D.A.: Cost estimation: methods and tools. Wiley, Hoboken (2015)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. De Mare, G., Morano, P.: La stima del costo delle opere pubbliche. Utet, Torino (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Charette, R.P., Marshall, H.E.: UNIFORMAT II Elemental Classification for Building Specifications, Cost Estimating, and Cost Analysis. NIST, USA (1999)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. ASTM E 1557-97: Standard Classification for Building Elements and Related Sitework - UNIFORMAT II. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Akintoye, A., Fitzgerald, E.: A survey of current cost estimating practices in the UK. Constr. Manage. Econ. 18(2), 161–172 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Benge, D.P.: NRM1 Cost Management Handbook. Routledge, London (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors: New Rules of Measurement. Order of Cost Estimating and Cost Planning for Capital Building Works. 2nd edn. RICS, Coventry, UK (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Royal Institute of British Architects: RIBA Plan of Work 2013. RIBA, London (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Building Costs Information Service: Elemental Standard Form of Cost Analysis, 4th edn. BCIS, London (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Utica, G.: Ingegnerizzazione e gestione economica del progetto, vol. 1. Maggioli Editore, Rimini, Italy (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Utica, G.: Tecniche avanzate di Analisi e gestione dei progetti. McGraw-Hill, Milano (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Utica, G.: La stima sintetica del costo di costruzione, Il computo metrico e il computo metrico estimativo per classi di elementi tecnici. Maggioli Editore, Rimini, Italy (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tausworthe, R.C.: The work breakdown structure in software project management. J. Syst. Softw. 1, 181–186 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Haugan, G.T.: Effective Work Breakdown Structures. Management Concepts Inc., Vienna, VA (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jung, Y., Woo, S.: Flexible work breakdown structure for integrated cost and schedule control. J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 130(5), 616–625 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Miti, G.: Stima del costo di costruzione nelle opere di ingegneria civile, 2nd edn. Legislazione Tecnica, Roma (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Nesticò, A., Pipolo, O.: A protocol for sustainable building interventions: financial analysis and environmental effects. Int. J. Bus. Intell. Data Min. 10(3), 199–212 (2015). doi:10.1504/IJBIDM.2015.071325. Inderscience Enterprises Ltd., Genève, Switzerland

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Nesticò, A., Macchiaroli, M., Pipolo, O.: Costs and benefits in the recovery of historic buildings: the application of an economic model. Sustainability 7(11), 14661–14676 (2015). doi:10.3390/su71114661. MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bottero, M., Ferretti, V., Mondini, G.: How to support strategic decisions in territorial transformation processes. Int. J. Agric. Environ. Inf. Syst. 6(4), 40–55 (2015). doi:10.4018/IJAEIS.2015100103. IGI Global Publishing, United States

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Morano, P., Tajani, F.: The break-even analysis applied to urban renewal investments: a model to evaluate the share of social housing financially sustainable for private investors. Habitat Int. 59, 10–20 (2017). doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.11.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kim, G.H., An, S.H., Kang, K.I.: Comparison of construction cost estimating models based on regression analysis, neural networks, and casebased reasoning. Build. Environ. 39(10), 1235–1242 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Campania, R.: Prezzario dei lavori Pubblici. DEI Tipografia del Genio Civile, Roma (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mare, G., Manganelli, B., Nesticò, A.: The economic evaluation of investments in the energy sector: a model for the optimization of the scenario analyses. In: Murgante, B., Misra, S., Carlini, M., Torre, C.M., Nguyen, H.-Q., Taniar, D., Apduhan, B.O., Gervasi, O. (eds.) ICCSA 2013. LNCS, vol. 7972, pp. 359–374. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-39643-4_27

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. Calavita, N., Calabrò, F., Della Spina, L.: Transfer of development rights as incentives for regeneration of illegal settlements. In: 1th International Symposium New Metropolitan Perspectives (ISTH 2020). Advanced Engineering Forum, vol. 11, pp. 639–646. Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland (2014). doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AEF.11.639

  34. Nesticò, A., Galante, M.: An estimate model for the equalisation of real estate tax: a case study. Int. J. Bus. Intell. Data Min. 10(1), 19–32 (2015). doi:10.1504/IJBIDM.2015.069038. Inderscience Enterprises Ltd., Genève, Switzerland

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Aragona, S., Calabrò, F., Della Spina, L.: The evaluation culture to build a network of competitive cities in the mediterranean. In: 1th International Symposium New Metropolitan Perspectives (ISTH 2020). Advanced Engineering Forum, vol. 11, pp. 476–482. Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland (2014). doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AEF.11.476

  36. Greco, I., Bencardino, M.: The paradigm of the modern city: SMART and SENSEable Cities for smart, inclusive and sustainable growth. In: Murgante, B., Misra, S., Rocha, A.M.A.C., Torre, C., Rocha, J.G., Falcão, M.I., Taniar, D., Apduhan, B.O., Gervasi, O. (eds.) ICCSA 2014. LNCS, vol. 8580, pp. 579–597. Springer, Cham (2014). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-09129-7_42

    Google Scholar 

  37. Bencardino, M.: Demographic changes and urban sprawl in two middle-sized cities of campania region (Italy). In: Gervasi, O., Murgante, B., Misra, S., Gavrilova, M.L., Rocha, A.M.A.C., Torre, C., Taniar, D., Apduhan, Bernady O. (eds.) ICCSA 2015. LNCS, vol. 9158, pp. 3–18. Springer, Cham (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21410-8_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  38. De Mare, G., Granata, M.F., Nesticò, A.: Weak and strong compensation for the prioritization of public investments: multidimensional analysis for pools. Sustainability 7(12), 16022–16038 (2015). doi:10.3390/su71215798. MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Bencardino, M., Nesticò, A.: Demographic changes and real estate values. A quantitative model for analyzing the urban-rural linkages. Sustainability 9(4), 536 (2017). doi:10.3390/su9040536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Guarini, M.R., Buccarini, C., Battisti, F.: Technical and Economic Evaluation of a Building Recovery by Public-Private Partnership in Rome (Italy). In: Stanghellini, S., Morano, P., Bottero, M., Oppio, A. (eds.) Appraisal: From Theory to Practice. GET, pp. 101–115. Springer, Cham (2017). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-49676-4_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio Nesticò .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Nesticò, A., De Mare, G., Frusciante, B., Dolores, L. (2017). Construction Costs Estimate for Civil Works. A Model for the Analysis During the Preliminary Stage of the Project. In: Gervasi, O., et al. Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2017. ICCSA 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10408. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62404-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62404-4_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62403-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62404-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics