[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

A Neural Network Model for Team Viability

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2017 (ICCSA 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 10405))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1888 Accesses

Abstract

Team effectiveness has been the focus of numerous studies since teams play an increasingly decisive role in modern organizations. In the present paper, our attention is centered on team viability, which is one dimension of team effectiveness. Given the challenges that actual teams face today, exploring the conditions and processes that enhance the capacity of teams to adapt and continue to work together is a fundamental research path to pursue. In this study, team psychological capital and team learning were considered as antecedents of team viability. The relationships that team psychological capital and team learning establish with team viability were explored as accurately as possible. Typically, these relationships are assumed to be linear as multivariate linear models are often used. However, these linear models fail to explain possible nonlinear relations between variables, expected to exist in dynamic systems as teams. Adopting computational modeling strategies in the context of organizational psychology has become more common. In this paper, radial basis function models and neural networks were used to study the complex relationships between team psychological capital, team learning and team viability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 35.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 44.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Albuquerque, L.B.: Team resilience and team effectiveness: adaptation of measuring instruments. Master thesis, Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciências da Educação da Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Avey, J.B., Luthans, F., Youssef, C.M.: The additive value of positive psychological capital in predicting work attitudes and behaviors. J. Manage. 36, 430–452 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Aubé, C., Rousseau, V.: Team goal commitment and team effectiveness: the role of task interdependence and supportive behaviors. Group. Dyn. Theor. Res. 9, 189–204 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bandura, A.: Social Learning Theory, Revised edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bryman, A., Cramer, D.: Quantitative Data Analysis for Social Scientists, rev edn. Routledge, Florence (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bunderson, J.S., Sutcliffe, K.M.: Management team learning orientation and business unit performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 88, 552–560 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Burke, M.J., Finkelstein, L.M., Dusig, M.S.: On average deviation indices for estimating interrater agreement. Organ. Res. Methods 2, 49–68 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chan, C., Pearson, C., Entrekin, L.: Examining the effects of internal and external team learning on team performance. Team Perform. Manage. 9, 174–181 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Clapp-Smith, R., Vogelgesang, G.R., Avey, J.B.: Authentic leadership and positive psychological capital: the mediating role of trust at the group level of analysis. J. Leadersh. Organ. Stud. 15, 227–240 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cohen, S.G., Bailey, D.E.: What makes teams work: group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. J. Manage. 23, 239–290 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cortina, J.M., Aguinis, H., DeShon, R.P.: Twilight of dawn or of evening? A century of research methods. J. Appl. Psychol. 102, 274–290 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Decuyper, S., Dochy, F., Bossche, P.V.: Grasping the dynamic complexity of team learning: an integrative model for effective team learning in organizations. Educ. Res. Rev. 5, 111–133 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dimas, I.D., Rocha, H., Rebelo, T., Lourenço, P.R.: A nonlinear multicriteria model for team effectiveness. In: Gervasi, O., et al. (eds.) ICCSA 2016. LNCS, vol. 9789, pp. 595–609. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-42089-9_42

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Edmondson, A.C.: Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Admin. Sci. Q. 44, 350–383 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Flood, P., Maccurtain, S., West, M.: Effective Top Management Teams: An International Perspective. Blackhall Publishing, Dublin (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gully, S.M., Incalcaterra, K.A., Joshi, A., Beauien, M.J.: A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. J. Appl. Psychol. 87, 819–832 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hackman, J.R.: The design of work teams. In: Lorsch, J. (ed.) Handbook of Organizational Behavior, pp. 315–342. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hackman, J.R.: From causes to conditions in group research. J. Organ. Behav. 33, 428–444 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hanges, P.J., Lord, R.G., Godfrey, E.G., Raver, J.L.: Modeling nonlinear relationships: neural networks and catastrophe analysis. In: Rogelberg, S.G. (ed.) Handbook of Research Methods in Industrial and Organizational Psychology, pp. 431–455. Blackwell Publishing, Maiden (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Heled, E., Somech, A., Waters, L.: Psychological capital as a team phenomenon: mediating the relationship between learning climate and outcomes at the individual and team levels. J. Posit. Psychol. 9760, 1–12 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kozlowski, S.W.J., Ilgen, D.R.: Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. PSPI 7, 77–124 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Luthans, F., Avey, J.B., Avolio, B.J., Norman, S.M., Combs, G.M.: Psychological capital development: toward a micro-intervention. J. Organ. Behav. 27, 387–393 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Luthans, F., Norman, S.M., Avolio, B.J., Avey, J.B.: The mediating role of psychological capital in the supportive organizational climate-employee performance relationship. J. Organ. Behav. 29, 219–238 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Luthans, F., Youssef, C.M.: Human, social, and now positive psychological capital management. Organ. Dyn. 33, 143–160 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Luthans, F., Avolio, B.J., Avey, J.B., Norman, S.M.: Positive psychological capital: measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction. Pers. Psychol. 60, 541–572 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mathieu, J.E., Heffner, T.S., Goodwin, G.F., Salas, E., Cannon-Bowers, J.A.: The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 85, 273–283 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mathe-Soulek, K., Scott-Halsell, S., Kim, S., Krawczyk, M.: Psychological capital in the quick service restaurant industry: a study of unit-level performance. J. Hosp. Tour. Res. 24 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  28. MATLAB 2016a. The MathWorks Inc., Natick (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Nelder, J., Mead, R.: A simplex method for function minimization. Comput. J. 7, 308–313 (1965)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Newman, A., Ucbasaran, D., Zhu, F., Hirst, G.: Psychological capital: a review and synthesis. J. Organ. Behav. 35, s1 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Powell, M.: Radial basis function methods for interpolation to functions of many variables. HERMIS Int. J. Comput. Math. Appl. 3, 1–23 (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Rocha, H., Li, W., Hahn, A.: Principal component regression for fitting wing weight data of subsonic transports. J. Aircr. 43, 1925–1936 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Rocha, H.: Model parameter tuning by cross validation and global optimization: application to the wing weight fitting problem. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 37, 197–202 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Rocha, H.: On the selection of the most adequate radial basis function. Appl. Math. Model. 33, 1573–1583 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Rocha, H., Dias, J.M., Ferreira, B.C., Lopes, M.C.: Selection of intensity modulated radiation therapy treatment beam directions using radial basis functions within a pattern search methods framework. J. Global Optim. 57, 1065–1089 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Rocha, H., Dias, J.M., Ferreira, B.C., Lopes, M.C.: Beam angle optimization for intensity-modulated radiation therapy using a guided pattern search method. Phys. Med. Biol. 58, 2939 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Schmidhuber, J.: Deep learning in neural networks: an overview. Neural Netw. 61, 85–117 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Stajkovic, A.D., Luthans, F.: Self-efficacy and work-related performance: a meta analysis. Psychol. Bull. 44, 580–590 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Sundstrom, E., De Meuse, K., Futrell, D.: Work teams: applications and effectiveness. Am. Psychol. 45, 120–133 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Tu, J.: Cross-validated multivariate metamodeling methods for physics-based computer simulations. In: Proceedings of the IMAC-XXI (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Youssef, C.M., Luthans, F.: Positive organizational behavior in the workplace: the impact of hope, optimism, and resilience. J. Manage. 33, 774–800 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Vancouver, J.B., Thompson, C.M., Williams, A.A.: The changing signs in the relationships among self-efficacy, personal goals, and performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 8, 605–620 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. West, B.J., Patera, J.L., Carsten, M.K.: Team level positivity: investigating positive psychological capacities and team level outcomes. J. Organ. Behav. 30, 249–267 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Verhaeren, T.: Is a strong sense of self-efficacy always beneficial? BUT Philolos. Soc. Sci. 5, 193–200 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) under project grants UID/MULTI/00308/2013 and POCI-01-0145-FEDER-008540.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Humberto Rocha .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dimas, I.D., Rocha, H., Rebelo, T., Lourenço, P.R. (2017). A Neural Network Model for Team Viability. In: Gervasi, O., et al. Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2017. ICCSA 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10405. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62395-5_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62395-5_38

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62394-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62395-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics