[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Trust-Based Multi-stakeholder Decision Making in Water Allocation System

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances on Broad-Band Wireless Computing, Communication and Applications (BWCCA 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies ((LNDECT,volume 12))

Abstract

Water allocation domain requires collaboration among stakeholders when making any decision regarding the solution to use to get the maximum benefits with fewer damages. The challenging part of the water allocation system is the interactions among those entities with the existence of conflicts. Therefore, there has to be a decision-making model that takes the stakeholders into account when producing the best outcomes. Due to the involvement of people who make the decision, trust among them comes to the picture. Moreover, every solution is associated with a number of benefits and damages. Trust is used as primary criteria in decision-making model along with the damages and benefits associated with each solution. The main contribution of this paper is to build a multi-stakeholder Decision-Making Model having these characteristics: trust, damages, and benefits as criteria, trust is associated with the involvement of the human. The model is dynamic by adapting to the changes over time. The decision to select is the solution that is fair with almost everyone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 143.50
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 179.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aikebaier, A., Enokido, T., Takizawa, M.: Trustworthiness among peer processes in distributed agreement protocol. In: 2010 24th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications, Perth, WA, pp. 565–572 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/AINA.2010.114

  2. Alcalde, B., Dubois, E., Mauw, S., Mayer, N., Radomirović, S.: Towards a decision model based on trust and security risk management. In: Brankovic, L., Susilo, W. (eds.) Proceedings of the Seventh Australasian Conference on Information Security, vol. 98, (AISC 2009), pp. 61–70. Australian Computer Society, Inc., Darlinghurst, Australia (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ahmadi, K., Allan, V.H.: Trust-based decision making in a self-adaptive agent organization. ACM Trans. Auton. Adapt. Syst. 11(2), 25 (2016). Article ID: 10, https://doi.org/10.1145/2839302

  4. Alonso, S., Perez, I.J., Cabrerizo, F.J., Herrera-Viedma, E.: A fuzzy group decision making model for large groups of individuals. In: 2009 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, Jeju Island, pp. 643–648 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1109/FUZZY.2009.5277355

  5. Burnett, C., Chen, L., Edwards, P., Norman, T.J.: TRAAC: trust and risk aware access control. In: 2014 Twelfth Annual International Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust, Toronto, ON, pp. 371–378 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/PST.2014.6890962

  6. Capuano, N., Chiclana, F., Fujita, H., Herrera-Viedma, E., Loia, V.: Fuzzy group decision making with incomplete information guided by social influence. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. PP(99), p. 1. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2017.2744605

  7. Cayirci, E.: A joint trust and risk model for MSaaS mashups. In: Winter Simulations Conference (WSC), Washington, DC, pp. 1347–1358 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/WSC.2013.6721521

  8. Cho, J.-H., Cam, H., Oltramari, A.: Effect of personality traits on trust and risk to phishing vulnerability: modeling and analysis. In: 2016 IEEE International Multi-disciplinary Conference on Cognitive Methods in Situation Awareness and Decision Support (CogSIMA), San Diego, CA, pp. 7–13 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/COGSIMA.2016.7497779

  9. Chomphoosang, P., Ruan, Y., Durresi, A., Durresi, M., Barolli, L.: Trust management of health care information in social networks. In: 2013 Seventh International Conference on Complex, Intelligent, and Software Intensive Systems, Taichung, pp. 228–235 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/CISIS.2013.45

  10. Dimmock, N., Bacon, J., Ingram, D., Moody, K.: Risk Models for Trust-Based Access Control (TBAC), pp. 364–371. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dimmock, N., Belokosztolszki, A., Eyers, D., Bacon, J., Moody, K.: Using trust and risk in role-based access control policies. In Proceedings of the Ninth ACM Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies (SACMAT 2004), pp. 156–162. ACM, New York (2004). https://doi.org/10.1145/990036.990062

  12. Duan, J., Gao, D., Foh, C.H., Leung, V.C.M.: Trust and risk assessment approach for access control in wireless sensor networks. In: 2013 IEEE 78th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Fall), pp. 1–5, Las Vegas, NV (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/VTCFall.2013.6692446

  13. Gan, Z., Xiao, X., Li, K.: A multi-dimension trust risk evaluation for e-commerce systems. In: Eighth Web Information Systems and Applications Conference, Chongqing, pp. 143–149 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/WISA.2011.34

  14. Ghodsi, S.H., Kerachian, R., Zahmatkesh, Z.: A multi-stakeholder framework for urban runoff quality management: application of social choice and bargaining techniques. Sci. Total Environ. 550, 574–585 (2016). ISSN: 0048-9697, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.052

  15. Grazioli, S., Wang, A.: Looking without seeing: Understanding unsophisticated consumers success and failure to detect internet deception. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 2001, 16–19 December 2001, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, p. 193 (2001). http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2001/23

  16. Hartaman, A., Rahmat, B., Istikmal, I.: Performance and fairness analysis (using Jain’s index) of AODV and DSDV based on ACO in MANETs. In: 2015 4th International Conference on Interactive Digital Media (ICIDM), Bandung, pp. 1–7 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/IDM.2015.7516337

  17. Hu, X.: A game-trust-risk based framework to enhance reliable interaction in e-commerce. In: 2010 3rd International Conference on Computer Science and Information Technology, Chengdu, pp. 424–428 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSIT.2010.5565191

  18. Indiramma, M., Anandakumar, K.R.: Collaborative decision making framework for multi-agent system. In: 2008 International Conference on Computer and Communication Engineering, Kuala Lumpur, pp. 1140–1146 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCE.2008.4580785

  19. Jsang, A., Presti, S.L.: Analysing the Relationship Between Risk and Trust, pp. 135–145. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kim, D.J., Ferrin, D.L., Rao, H.R.: A trust-based consumer decision-making model in electronic commerce: the role of trust, perceived risk, and their antecedents. Decis. Support Syst. 44(2), 544–564 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2007.07.001, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167923607001005

  21. Jiang, W., Wu, J., Wang, G.: On selecting recommenders for trust evaluation in online social networks. ACM Trans. Internet Technol. 15(4), 21, Article ID: 14 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2807697

  22. Dickson, K.W., Chiu, H.-F.L., Lam, K.-M.: Making personalized recommendations to customers in a service-oriented economy: a quantitative model based on reputation and risk attitude. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Electronic Commerce (ICEC 2005), pp. 210–216. ACM, New York (2005). https://doi.org/10.1145/1089551.1089592

  23. Lau, B.P.L., Singh, A.K., Tan, T.P.L.: Weighted voting game based algorithm for joining a microscopic coalition. In: IEEE International Conference of IEEE Region 10 (TENCON 2013), Xi’an, pp. 1–4 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/TENCON.2013.6718491

  24. Li, Y., Sun, H., Chen, Z., Ren, J., Luo, H.: Using trust and risk in access control for grid environment. In: 2008 International Conference on Security Technology, pp. 13–16, Hainan Island (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/SecTech.2008.50

  25. Li, Y., Zhao, M., Sun, H., Chen, Z.: A trust and risk framework to enhance reliable interaction in e-commerce. In: 2008 IEEE International Conference on e-Business Engineering, Xi’an, pp. 475–480 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEBE.2008.80

  26. Liu, F., Wang, J., Bai, H., Sun, H.: Access control model based on trust and risk evaluation in IDMaaS. In: 2015 12th International Conference on Information Technology - New Generations, Las Vegas, NV, pp. 179–184 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/ITNG.2015.34

  27. Mingxing, S., Jing, F., Yafang, L.: An empirical study on consumer acceptance of mobile payment based on the perceived risk and trust. In: 2014 International Conference on Cyber-Enabled Distributed Computing and Knowledge Discovery, Shanghai, pp. 312–317 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/CyberC.2014.62

  28. Patrick, A.S.: Building trustworthy software agents. IEEE Internet Comput. 6(6), 46–53 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1109/MIC.2002.1067736

  29. Pereira, A., Rodrigues, N., Barbosa, J., Leito, P.: Trust and risk management towards resilient large-scale cyber-physical systems. In: IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics, Taipei, Taiwan, pp. 1–6 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISIE.2013.6563837

  30. Quercia, D., Hailes, S.: Risk aware decision framework for trusted mobile interactions (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rodriguez, M.A.: Social decision making with multi-relational networks and grammar-based particle swarms. In: 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS 2007, Waikoloa, HI, p. 39 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2007.487

  32. Ruan, Y., Durresi, A.: A survey of trust management systems for online social communities - trust modeling, trust inference and attacks. Knowl. Based Syst. 106(C), 150–163 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2016.05.042

  33. Ruan, Y., Durresi, A.: A trust management framework for cloud computing platforms. In: 2017 IEEE 31st International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA), Taipei, pp. 1146–1153 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ruan, Y., Alfantoukh, L., Durresi, A.: Exploring stock market using Twitter trust network. In: 2015 IEEE 29th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications, Gwangiu, pp. 428–433 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/AINA.2015.217

  35. Ruan, Y., Durresi, A., Alfantoukh, L.: Trust management framework for internet of things. In: 2016 IEEE 30th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA), Crans-Montana, pp. 1013–1019 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/AINA.2016.136

  36. Ruan, Y., Alfantoukh, L., Fang, A., Durresi, A.: Exploring trust propagation behaviors in online communities. In: 2014 17th International Conference on Network-Based Information Systems, Salerno, pp. 361–367 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/NBiS.2014.91

  37. Ruan, Y., Zhang, P., Alfantoukh, L., Durresi, A.: Measurement theory-based trust management framework for online social communities. ACM Trans. Internet Technol. 17(2), 24 (2017). Article ID: 16, https://doi.org/10.1145/3015771

  38. Ruizhong, D., Xiaoxue, M., Zixian, W.: Dynamic trust model based on perceived risk. In: 2010 International Conference on E-Business and E-Government, Guangzhou, pp. 2037–2040 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEE.2010.515

  39. Sanchez-Anguix, V., Julian, V., Botti, V., Garcia-Fornes, A.: Reaching unanimous agreements within agent-based negotiation teams with linear and monotonic utility functions. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B (Cybern.) 42(3), 778–792 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCB.2011.2177658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Singh, A.J., Acharya, S., Dutta, A.: Agent based task specific team formation for effective distributed decision making. In: 2013 10th International Conference on Electrical Engineering/Electronics, Computer, Telecommunications and Information Technology, Krabi, pp. 1–6 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/ECTICon.2013.6559568

  41. Su, J.M., Liu, B.H., Gao, Z.Y., Li, Q., Ma, H.X.: A opinion dynamic model of group experts free discussion. In: 25th Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC), Guiyang, pp. 1638–1642 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/CCDC.2013.6561193

  42. Tundjungsari, V., Istiyanto, J.E., Winarko, E., Wardoyo, R.: A reputation based trust model to seek judgment in participatory group decision making. In: 2010 International Conference on Distributed Frameworks for Multimedia Applications, Yogyakarta, pp. 1–7 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Wang, Y., Lin, F.R.: Trust and risk evaluation of transactions with different amounts in peer-to-peer e-commerce environments. In: 2006 IEEE International Conference on e-Business Engineering (ICEBE 2006), Shanghai, pp. 102–109 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEBE.2006.102

  44. Wu, J., Chiclana, F.: A social network analysis trustconsensus based approach to group decision-making problems with interval-valued fuzzy reciprocal preference relations. Knowl. Based Syst. 59, 97–107 (2014). ISSN: 0950-7051, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2014.01.017

  45. Xie, Y., Runck, B.C., Shekhar, S., Kne, L., Mulla, D., Jordan, N., Wiringa, P.: Collaborative geodesign and spatial optimization for fragmentation-free land allocation. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 6(7), 226 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Yao, Q., Zhao, M., Li, Y., Gao, Z.-M.: A trust and risk based dispute settlement mechanism in e-voting. In: 2009 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, Baoding, pp. 2775–2780 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMLC.2009.5212648

  47. Ye, L.: The establishment of perceived risk and trust in e-commerce. In: 2012 Second International Conference on Business Computing and Global Informatization, Shanghai, pp. 229–232 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/BCGIN.2012.66

  48. Zhang, P., Durresi, A., Ruan, Y., Durresi, M.: Trust based security mechanisms for social networks. In: 2012 Seventh International Conference on Broadband, Wireless Computing, Communication and Applications, Victoria, BC, pp. 264–270 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/BWCCA.2012.50

  49. Zuo, C., Zhou, J., Feng, H.: A security policy based on bi-evaluations of trust and risk in P2P Systems. In: 2010 2nd International Conference on Education Technology and Computer, Shanghai, pp. V5-304–V5-309 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICETC.2010.5530065

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA)

USDA AWARD NUMBER: 2017-67003-26057

INFEWS/T2: Collaborative: iFEWCoordNet - a secure decision support system for coordination of adaptation planning among FEW actors in the Pacific Northwest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer and Information Science, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA

    Lina Alfantoukh, Yefeng Ruan & Arjan Durresi

Authors
  1. Lina Alfantoukh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yefeng Ruan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Arjan Durresi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arjan Durresi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Information Engineering, Department of Information and Communication Engineering, Fukuoka Institute of Technology, Fukuoka, Japan

    Leonard Barolli

  2. Technical University of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain

    Fatos Xhafa

  3. Open University of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain

    Jordi Conesa

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Alfantoukh, L., Ruan, Y., Durresi, A. (2018). Trust-Based Multi-stakeholder Decision Making in Water Allocation System. In: Barolli, L., Xhafa, F., Conesa, J. (eds) Advances on Broad-Band Wireless Computing, Communication and Applications. BWCCA 2017. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, vol 12. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69811-3_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69811-3_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69810-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69811-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation