Abstract
Verbal route descriptions are common in our daily lives that give us wayfinding directions. They also are important in cognitive research as they lend insight on processes associated with wayfinding. This paper reports a study that investigates the influence of familiarity and spatial abilities on acquiring spatial knowledge from verbal route directions. The familiarity of the participant was removed by replacing all names of spatial entities in the route instructions given by the same person. Specifically, the types of acquired spatial knowledge addressed are direction, distance, and configurational aspects of sketched maps. Results show that familiarity plays a crucial role on acquisition of spatial knowledge at the survey level. In particular, familiarity leads to fewer errors in directional estimation, but overestimation of distance. Spatial abilities further influence one’s knowledge of distance such that higher spatial abilities lead to more accurate distance estimation in new environments. With that said, lower spatial abilities do not contribute to distance estimation in both familiar and new environments. Furthermore, measures on sketch maps show that familiarity does not lead to dramatically different sketch maps while variation exist. These results also point out the necessity of follow-up studies to address the orientation specificity in familiar and unfamiliar environment.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Denis, M., Pazzaglia, F., Cornoldi, C., Bertolo, L.: Spatial discourse and navigation: an analysis of route directions in the city of Venice. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 13, 145–174 (1999)
Giudice, N.A., Bakdash, J.Z., Legge, G.E.: Wayfinding with words: spatial learning and navigation using dynamically updated verbal descriptions. Psychol. Res. 71, 347–358 (2006)
Allen, G.L.: Principles and practices for communicating route knowledge. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 14, 333–359 (2000)
Lovelace, K.L., Hegarty, M., Montello, D.R.: Elements of Good Route Directions in Familiar and Unfamiliar Environments. In: Freksa, C., Mark, D.M. (eds.) COSIT 1999. LNCS, vol. 1661, pp. 65–82. Springer, Heidelberg (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48384-5_5
Hölscher, C., Tenbrink, T., Wiener, J.M.: Would you follow your own route description? Cognitive strategies in urban route planning. Cognition 121, 228–247 (2011)
Li, R., Fuest, S., Schwering, A.: The effects of different verbal route instructions on spatial orientation. In: The 17th AGILE Conference on Geographic Information Science, Castellon, Spain (2014)
Tom, A., Denis, M.: Language and spatial cognition: comparing the roles of landmarks and street names in route instructions. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 18, 1213–1230 (2004)
Denis, M., Zimmere, M.: Analog properties of cognitive maps constructed from verbal descriptions. Psychol. Res. 54, 286–298 (1992)
Denis, M.: The description of routes: a cognitive approach to the production of spatial discourse. Cahiers de psychologie cognitive 16, 409–458 (1997)
Daniel, M.P., Tom, A., Manghi, E., Denis, M.: Testing the value of route directions through navigational performance. Spat. Cogn. Comput. 3, 269–289 (2003)
Michon, P.-E., Denis, M.: When and why are visual landmarks used in giving directions? In: Montello, D.R. (ed.) COSIT 2001. LNCS, vol. 2205, pp. 292–305. Springer, Heidelberg (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45424-1_20
Timpf, S.: Ontologies of wayfinding: a traveler’s perspective. Netw. Spat. Econ. 2, 9–33 (2002)
Klippel, A., Winter, S.: Structural salience of landmarks for route directions. In: Cohn, A.G., Mark, D.M. (eds.) COSIT 2005. LNCS, vol. 3693, pp. 347–362. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11556114_22
Gale, N., Golledge, R.G., Pellegrino, J.W., Doherty, S.: The acquisition and integration of route knowledge in an unfamiliar neighborhood. J. Environ. Psychol. 10, 3–25 (1990)
Weisman, J.: Evaluating architectural legibility: way-finding in the built environment. Environ. Behav. 13, 189–204 (1981)
Prestopnik, J.L., Roskos-Ewoldsen, B.: The relations among wayfinding strategy use, sense of direction, sex, familiarity, and wayfinding ability. J. Environ. Psychol. 20, 177–191 (2000)
Gale, N., Golledge, R.G., Halperin, W.C., Couclelis, H.: Exploring spatial familiarity. Prof. Geogr. 42, 299–313 (1990)
Montello, D.R.: Navigation. In: Shah, P., Miyake, A. (eds.) Cambridge Handbook of Visuospatial Thinking, pp. 257–294. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England (2005)
Hart, R.A., Moore, G.T.: The development of spatial cognition: A review. In: Downs, R., Stea, D. (eds.) Image and Environment: Cognitive Mapping and Spatial Behavior, pp. 124–288. Aldine Publishing, Chicago (1973)
Sholl, M.J., Acacio, J.C., Markar, R.O., Leon, C.: The relation of sex and sense of direction to spatial orientation in an unfamiliar environment. J. Environ. Psychol. 20, 17–28 (2000)
Loomis, J.M., Blascovich, J.J., Beall, A.C.: Immersive virtual environment technology as a basic research tool in psychology. Behav. Res. Methods 31, 557–564 (1999)
Allen, G.L.: Spatial abilities, cognitive maps, and wayfinding: bases for individual differences in spatial cognition and behavior. In: Golledge, R.G. (ed.) Wayfinding Behavior: Cognitive Mapping And Other Spatial Processes, Baltimore, pp. 46–80 (1999)
Downs, R.M., Stea, D.: Cognitive maps and spatial behavior: Process and products. In: Downs, R.M., Stea, D. (eds.) Image and Environment. Aldine, Chicago (1973)
Levine, M.: You-are-here maps psychological considerations. Environ. Behav. 14, 221–237 (1982)
Billinghurst, M., Weghorst, S.: The use of sketch maps to measure cognitive maps of virtual environments. In: Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium, pp. 40–47. IEEE (1995)
Li, R., Bell, S.: Performance of directional estimation and route sketching: What differentiates and what predicts? In: Proceedings of Workshop of an Interdisciplinary Approach to Understanding and Proceeding Sketch Maps in conjunction with COSIT 2011, vol. 42, pp. 33–44. IFGI Prints, Belfast, ME (2011), ISSN 2191-5237
Wang, J., Li, R.: An empirical study on pertinent aspects of sketch maps for navigation. Int. J. Cogn. Inf. Natural Intell. (IJCINI) 7, 26–43 (2013)
Schwering, A., Wang, J., Chipofya, M., Jan, S., Li, R., Broelemann, K.: SketchMapia: Qualitative Representations for the Alignment of Sketch and Metric Maps. Spatial Cogn. Comput. 14, 220–254 (2014)
Rovine, M.J., Weisman, G.D.: Sketch-map variables as predictors of way-finding performance. J. Environ. Psychol. 9, 217–232 (1989)
Münzer, S., Zimmer, H.D., Baus, J.: A trade-off between wayfinding support and configural learning support. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 18, 18–37 (2012)
Kettunen, P., Irvankoski, K., Krause, C.M., Sarjakoski, L.T.: Landmarks in nature to support wayfinding: the effects of seasons and experimental methods. Cogn. Process. 14, 245–253 (2013)
Chipofya, M., Wang, J., Schwering, A.: Towards cognitively plausible spatial representations for sketch map alignment. In: Egenhofer, M., Giudice, N., Moratz, R., Worboys, M. (eds.) COSIT 2011. LNCS, vol. 6899, pp. 20–39. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23196-4_2
Okamoto, K., Okunuki, K.-i., Takai, T.: Sketch map analysis using gis buffer operation. In: Freksa, C., Knauff, M., Krieg-Brückner, B., Nebel, B., Barkowsky, T. (eds.) Spatial Cognition 2004. LNCS, vol. 3343, pp. 227–244. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32255-9_14
Friedman, A., Kohler, B.: Bidimensional Regression: Assessing the configural similarity and accuracy of cognitive maps and other two-dimensional data sets. Psychol. Methods 8, 468–491 (2003)
Gardony, A.L., Taylor, H.A., Brunyé, T.T.: Gardony Map Drawing Analyzer: Software for quantitative analysis of sketch maps. Behav. Res. Methods 48, 151–177 (2016)
National League of Cities: Most Common U.S. Street Names (2016). http://www.nlc.org/most-common-us-street-names. Accessed 10 Jan 2017
Münzer, S., Christensen, A.E., Liben, L.: Finding your way around the environment: Differences and similarities across countries in self-reports. In: Rapp, D. (ed.) Poster Proceedings of International Conference on Spatial Cognition 2010, Mt. Hood, Oregon, p. 66 (2010)
Vandenberg, S.G., Kuse, A.R.: Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Percept. Mot. Skills 47, 599–604 (1978)
Gardony, A.L., Taylor, H.A., Brunyé, T.T.: Gardony map drawing analyzer: software for quantitative analysis of sketch maps. Behav. Res. Methods 48, 151–177 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0556-x
Taylor, H.A., Tversky, B.: Spatial mental models derived from survey and route descriptions. J. Mem. Lang. 31, 261–282 (1992)
Tversky, B., Lee, P.U.: Pictorial and verbal tools for conveying routes. In: Freksa, C., Mark, D.M. (eds.) COSIT 1999. LNCS, vol. 1661, pp. 51–64. Springer, Heidelberg (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48384-5_4
Ishikawa, T., Montello, D.: Spatial knowledge acquisition from direct experience in the environment: Individual differences in the development of metric knowledge and the integration of separately learned places. Cogn. Psychol. 52, 93–129 (2005)
Li, R., Klippel, A.: Wayfinding Behaviors in Complex Buildings: the Impact of Environmental Legibility and Familiarity. Environ. Behav. 48, 482–510 (2016)
O’Neill, M.J.: Effects of familiarity and plan complexity on wayfinding in simulated buildings. J. Environ. Psychol. 12, 319–327 (1992)
Magel, S.G., Sadalla, E.K.: The Perception of Traversed Distance. Environ. Behav. 12, 65–79 (1980)
Jansen-Osmann, P., Berendt, B.: Investigating Distance Knowledge Using Virtual Environments. Environ. Behav. 34, 178–193 (2002)
Cohen, R., Weatherford, D.L., Byrd, D.: Distance estimates of children as a function of acquisition and response activities. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 30, 464–472 (1980)
Jackson, R.E., Willey, C.R., Cormack, L.K.: Learning and exposure affect environmental perception less than evolutionary navigation costs. PLoS ONE 8, e59690 (2013)
Parush, A., Ahuvia, S., Erev, I.: Degradation in spatial knowledge acquisition when using automatic navigation systems. In: Winter, S., Duckham, M., Kulik, L., Kuipers, B. (eds.) COSIT 2007. LNCS, vol. 4736, pp. 238–254. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74788-8_15
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Li, R., Anacta, V.J.A., Schwering, A. (2017). Can You Follow Your Own Route Directions: How Familiarity and Spatial Abilities Influence Spatial Performance and Sketch Maps. In: Barkowsky, T., Burte, H., Hölscher, C., Schultheis, H. (eds) Spatial Cognition X. Spatial Cognition KogWis 2016 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10523. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68189-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68189-4_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68188-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68189-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)