[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

The Efficiency Analysis of the Multi-level Consensus Determination Method

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Collective Intelligence (ICCCI 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 10448))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The task of processing large sets of data which are stored in distributed sources is still a big problem. The determination of a one, consistent version of data could be very time- and cost-consuming. Therefore, the balance between the time of execution and the quality of the integration results is needed. This paper is devoted to a multi-level approach to data integration using the Consensus Theory. The experimental verification of multi-level integration methods has proved that the division of integration task into smaller subproblems gives similar results as the one-level approach, but improves a time performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arrow, K.J.: Social Choice and Individual Values. Wiley, New York (1963)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Barthelemy, J.P.: Thresholded consensus for n-trees. J. Classif. 5, 229–236 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Barthelemy, J.P., Janowitz, M.F.: A formal theory of consensus. SIAM J. Discrete Math. 4, 305–322 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Barthelemy, J.P., Leclerc, B.: The median procedure for partitions. In: DIMACS Series in Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 19, pp. 3–33 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Barthelemy, J.P., Monjardet, B.: The median procedure in cluster analysis and social choice theory. Math. Soc. Sci. 1, 235–267 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Brown, F.N.: Boolean Reasoning. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht (1990)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Daniłowicz, C., Nguyen, N.T.: Consensus-based partition in the space of ordered partitions. Pattern Recogn. 21, 269–273 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Day, W.H.E.: Consensus methods as tools for data analysis. In: Bock, H.H. (ed.) Classification and Related Methods for Data Analysis, pp. 312–324. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kozierkiewicz-Hetmańska, A.: Analysis of susceptibility to the consensus for a few representations of collective knowledge. Int. J. Softw. Eng. Knowl. Eng. 24(5), 759–775 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kozierkiewicz-Hetmańska, A.: Comparison of one-level and two-level consensuses satisfying the 2-optimality criterion. In: Nguyen, N.-T., Hoang, K., Jȩdrzejowicz, P. (eds.) ICCCI 2012. LNCS, vol. 7653, pp. 1–10. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-34630-9_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Kozierkiewicz-Hetmańska, A., Pietranik, M.: The knowledge increase estimation framework for ontology integration on the concept level. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 32(2), 1161–1172 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kozierkiewicz-Hetmańska A., Pietranik, M.: Assessing the quality of a consensus determined using a multi-level approach, In: Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on INnovations in Intelligent SysTems and Applications (2017, to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kozierkiewicz-Hetmańska, A., Pietranik, M., Hnatkowska, B.: The knowledge increase estimation framework for ontology integration on the instance level. In: Nguyen, N.T., Tojo, S., Nguyen, L.M., Trawiński, B. (eds.) ACIIDS 2017. LNCS, vol. 10191, pp. 3–12. Springer, Cham (2017). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-54472-4_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Kozierkiewicz-Hetmańska, A., Nguyen, N.T.: A comparison analysis of consensus determining using one and two-level methods. In: Advances in Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems, pp. 159–168 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. McMorris, F.R., Powers, R.C.: The median function on weak hierarchies. In: DIMACS Series in Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 37, pp. 265–269 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mirkin, B.G.: Problems of group choice, Nauka Moscow (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nguyen, N.T.: Using distance functions to solve representations choice problems. Fundamenta Informaticae 48, 295–314 (2001)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Nguyen, N.T.: Consensus Choice Methods and their Application to Solving Conflicts in Distributed Systems, Wroclaw University of Technology Press (2002). (in Polish)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nguyen, N.T.: Advanced Methods for Inconsistent Knowledge Management. Springer-Verlag, London (2008)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Pawlak, Z.: Rough Sets-Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning About Data. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht (1991)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This article is based upon work from COST Action KEYSTONE IC1302, supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Computer Science and Management, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Wybrzeze Wyspianskiego 27, 50-370, Wroclaw, Poland

    Adrianna Kozierkiewicz-Hetmańska & Mateusz Sitarczyk

Authors
  1. Adrianna Kozierkiewicz-Hetmańska
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mateusz Sitarczyk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adrianna Kozierkiewicz-Hetmańska .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Information Systems, Faculty of Computer Science and Management , Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wrocław, Poland

    Ngoc Thanh Nguyen

  2. Department of Computer Science, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus

    George A. Papadopoulos

  3. Department of Information Systems, Gdynia Maritime University, Gdynia, Poland

    Piotr Jędrzejowicz

  4. Department of Information Systems, Faculty of Computer Science and Management, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wrocław, Poland

    Bogdan Trawiński

  5. Department of Information Systems, University of Münster, Münster, Germany

    Gottfried Vossen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kozierkiewicz-Hetmańska, A., Sitarczyk, M. (2017). The Efficiency Analysis of the Multi-level Consensus Determination Method. In: Nguyen, N., Papadopoulos, G., Jędrzejowicz, P., Trawiński, B., Vossen, G. (eds) Computational Collective Intelligence. ICCCI 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10448. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67074-4_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67074-4_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67073-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67074-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation