Distributed Computer Systems

• Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Babaoglu, O., et al. (2006). Design patterns from biology for distributed computing. ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems, 1(1), 26–66.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Babaoglu, O., et al. (Eds.). (2005). Self-star properties in complex information systems: Conceptual and practical foundations, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3460. Berlin: Springer.

  Google Scholar 

• Barreteau, O. et al. (2017). Participatory approaches, Chap. 11 in this volume.

• Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. (1985). Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Engineering self-organising systems. In Brueckner, S., Di Marzo Serugendo, G., Hales, D., & Zambonelli, F. (Eds.) (2006). Proceedings of the 3 ^rd Workshop on Engineering Self-Organising Applications (EOSA’05), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 3910. Berlin: Springer.

  Google Scholar 

• Chattoe-Brown, E., & Edmonds, B. (2017). Evolutionary mechanisms, Chap. 21 in this volume.

• Cohen, B. (2003, June 5–6). Incentives build robustness in BitTorrent. In J. Chuang, & R. Krishnan (Eds.), Proceedings of the First Workshop on the Economics of Peer-2-Peer Systems, 2003, Berkley, CA. http://www2.sims.berkeley.edu/research/conferences/p2pecon/papers/s4-cohen.pdf

• Conte, R., & Paolucci, M. (2002). Reputation in artificial societies: Social beliefs for social order. Amsterdam: Kluwer.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Edmonds, B., & Hales, D. (2005). Computational simulation as theoretical experiment. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 29(3), 209–232.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., & Vlissides, J. (1995). Design patterns: Elements of reusable object-oriented software. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Geller, A., & Moss, S. (2017). Modeling power and authority: An emergentist view from Afghanistan, Chap. 27 in this volume.

• Hales, D., & Edmonds, B. (2003, July 2003). Evolving social rationality for MAS using “Tags”. In J. S. Rosenchein et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2 ^nd International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems, (AAMAS 2003), Melbourne (pp. 497–503). New York: ACM Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Hales, D., & Patarin, S. (2006). How to cheat BitTorrent and why nobody does. In J. Jost, F. Reed-Tsochas, & P. Schuster (Eds.), ECCS2006, Proceedings of the European Conference on Complex Systems, Towards a Science of Complex Systems. http://www.cabdyn.ox.ac.uk/complexity_PDFs/ECCS06/Conference_Proceedings/PDF/p19.pdf

• Hales, D. (2002). Group reputation supports beneficent norms. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 5(4). http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/5/4/4.html

• Hales, D. (2006). Emergent group-level selection in a peer-to-peer network. Complexus, 3, 108–118.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hales, D., & Arteconi, S. (2006). SLACER: A self-organizing protocol for coordination in P2P networks. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 21(2), 29–35.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hales, D., & Edmonds, B. (2005). Applying a socially-inspired technique (tags) to improve cooperation in P2P networks. IEEE Transactions in Systems, Man and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans, 35(3), 385–395.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kirman, A. (1993). Ants, rationality and recruitment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, 137–156.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kirman, A. P., & Vriend, N. J. (2001). Evolving market structure: An ACE model of price dispersion and loyalty. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 25(3/4), 459–502.

  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Lumsden, C., & Wilson, E. (1981). Genes, mind and culture. London: Harvard University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Rao, A. S., & Georgeff, M. P. (1991). Modeling rational agents within a BDI-architecture. In R. Fikes, & E. Sandewall (Eds.), Proceedings of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR&R-91) (pp. 473–484). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.

  Google Scholar 

• Riolo, R., Cohen, M., & Axelrod, R. (2001). Evolution of cooperation without reciprocity. Nature, 414, 441–443.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Rouchier, J. (2017). Agent-Based Simulation as a Useful Tool for the Simulation of Markets, Chap.~25 in this volume.

• Schelling, T. (1969). Models of segregation. American Economic Review, 59, 488–493.

  Google Scholar 

• Schelling, T. (1971). Dynamic models of segregation. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1(1), 143–186.

  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Singh, A., & Haahr, M. (2004, 18–22 September). Topology adaptation in P2P networks using Schelling’s model. In J. C. Oh, & D. Mosse (Eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop on Games and Emergent Behaviours in Distributed Computing Environments, co-located with PPSN VIII, Birmingham, UK.

  Google Scholar 

• Singh, A., & Haahr, M. (2006). Creating an adaptive network of hubs using Schelling’s model. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 69–73.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Staab, S., et al. (2005). Social networks applied. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 20(1), 80–93.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wang, F.-Y., Carley, K. M., Zeng, D., & Mao, W. (2007). Social computing: From social informatics to social intelligence. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 22(2), 79–83.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wooldridge, M., & Jennings, N. R. (1995). Intelligent agents: Theory and practice. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 10(2), 115–152.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Zimmermann, M. G., Eguiluz, V. M., & San Miguel, M. (2001). Cooperation, adaptation and the emergence of leadership. In A. Kirman & J. B. Zimmermann (Eds.), Economics with heterogeneous interacting agents (pp. 73–86). Berlin: Springer.

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references