Abstract
Traditional biology classes include lab experiments, which are missing from online education. Key challenges include the development of online tools to interface with laboratory resources, back-end logistics, cost, and scale-up. The recent emergence of biology cloud lab companies offers a promising, unexplored opportunity to integrate such labs into online education. We partnered with a cloud lab company to develop a customized prototype platform for graduate biology education based on bacterial growth measurements under antibiotic stress. We evaluated the platform in terms of (i) reliability, cost, and throughput; (ii) its ease of integration into general course content; and (iii) the flexibility and appeal of available experiment types. We were successful in delivering the lab; students designed and ran their own experiments, and analyzed their own data. However, the biological variability and reproducibility of these online experiments posed some challenges. Overall, this approach is very promising, but not yet ready for large-scale deployment in its present form; general advancements in relevant technologies should change this situation soon. We also deduce general lessons for the deployment of other (biology and non-biology) cloud labs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bonde, M.T., Makransky, G., Wandall, J., Larsen, M.V.: Improving biotech education through gamified laboratory simulations. Nature 32, 694–697 (2014)
Buchanan, R.L., Whiting, R.C., Damert, W.C.: When is simple good enough: a comparison of the Gompertz, Baranyi, and three-phase linear models for fitting bacterial growth curves. Food Microbiol. 14(4), 313–326 (1997). 1–14
de Jong, T., Linn, M.C., Zacharia, Z.C.: Physical and virtual laboratories in science and engineering. Education 340(6130), 305–308 (2013)
Faraji, R., Parsa, A., Torabi, B., Withrow, T.: Effects of kanamycin on the macromolecular composition of kanamycin sensitive Escherichia coli DH5α strain. J. Exp. Microbiol. Immunol. (JEMI) 9, 31–38 (2006)
Fox, A.: Cloud computing–what’s in it for me as a scientist? Science 331(6016), 406–407 (2011)
Hayden, E.C.: The automated lab. Nature 516, 131–132 (2014)
Heradio, R., de la Torre, L., Galan, D., Cabrerizo, F.J., Herrera-Viedma, E., Dormido, S.: Virtual and remote labs in education: a bibliometric analysis. Comput. Educ. 98(C), 14–38 (2016)
Hossain, Z., Chung, A.M., Riedel-Kruse, I.H.: Real-time and turn-based biology online experimentation. In: Remote Engineering and Virtual Instrumentation (REV) (2015)
Hossain, Z., Blikstein, P., Riedel-Kruse, I.H., Jin, X., Bumbacher, E.W., Chung, A.M., et al.: Interactive cloud experimentation for biology. Presented at the the 33rd Annual ACM Conference, pp. 3681–3690. ACM Press, New York (2015). http://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702354
Hossain, Z., Chung, A.M., Baumbacher, E., Lee, S.A., Honesty, K., Walter, A., et al.: A real-time interactive, scalable biology cloud experimentation platform. Nature Biotechnol. 34(12), 1293–1298 (2016)
Kong, F., Yuan, L., Zheng, Y.F., Chen, W.: Automatic liquid handling for life science: a critical review of the current state of the art. J. Lab. Autom. 17(3), 169–185 (2012)
Lee, J., Kladwang, W., Lee, M., Cantu, D., Azizyan, M., Kim, H., et al.: RNA design rules from a massive open laboratory. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 111(6), 2122–2127 (2014)
Lin, J., Lee, S.-M., Lee, H.-J., Koo, Y.-M.: Modeling of typical microbial cell growth in batch culture. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 5(5), 382–385 (2000)
Lowe, D., Newcombe, P., Stumpers, B.: Evaluation of the use of remote laboratories for secondary school. Sci. Educ. 43(3), 1197–1219 (2012)
Melin, J., Quake, S.R.: Microfluidic large-scale integration: the evolution of design rules for biological automation. Ann. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 36, 213–231 (2007)
Sauter, M., Uttal, D.H., Rapp, D.N., Downing, M., Jona, K.: Getting real: the authenticity of remote labs and simulations for science learning. Distance Educ. 34(1), 37–47 (2013)
Sia, S.K., Owens, M.P.: Share and share alike. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 1224–1228 (2015)
Swinnen, I.: Predictive modelling of the microbial lag phase: a review. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 94(2), 137–159 (2004)
Wieman, C.E., Adams, W.K., Perkins, K.K.: PHYSICS: PhET: simulations that enhance learning. Science 322(5902), 682–683 (2008)
Zwietering, M.H., de Koos, J.T., Hasenack, B.E., de Witt, J.C., van’t Riet, K.: Modeling of bacterial growth as a function of temperature. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 57(4), 1094–1101 (1991)
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank M. Hodak, the transcriptics team, Z. Hossain, X. Jin, H. Kim, M. Head, and the students in the class.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Riedel-Kruse, I.H. (2018). Incorporating a Commercial Biology Cloud Lab into Online Education. In: Auer, M., Zutin, D. (eds) Online Engineering & Internet of Things. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 22. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64352-6_32
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64352-6_32
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64351-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64352-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)