[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

Predicting Core Columns of Protein Multiple Sequence Alignments for Improved Parameter Advising

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Algorithms in Bioinformatics (WABI 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNBI,volume 9838))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In a computed protein multiple sequence alignment, the coreness of a column is the fraction of its substitutions that are in so-called core columns of the gold-standard reference alignment of its proteins. In benchmark suites of protein reference alignments, the core columns of the reference are those that can be confidently labeled as correct, usually due to all residues in the column being sufficiently close in the spatial superposition of the folded three-dimensional structures of the proteins. When computing a protein multiple sequence alignment in practice, a reference alignment is not known, so its coreness can only be predicted.

We develop for the first time a predictor of column coreness for protein multiple sequence alignments. This allows us to predict which columns of a computed alignment are core, and hence better estimate the alignment’s accuracy. Our approach to predicting coreness is similar to nearest-neighbor classification from machine learning, except we transform nearest-neighbor distances into a coreness prediction via a regression function, and we learn an appropriate distance function through a new optimization formulation that solves a large-scale linear programming problem. We apply our coreness predictor to parameter advising, the task of choosing parameter values for an aligner’s scoring function to obtain a more accurate alignment of a specific set of sequences. We show that for this task, our predictor strongly outperforms other column-confidence estimators from the literature, and affords a substantial boost in alignment accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 35.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 44.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Balaji, S., Sujatha, S., Kumar, S., Srinivasan, N.: PALI—a database of Phylogeny and ALIgnment of homologous protein structures. NAR 29(1), 61–65 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Capella-Gutierrez, S., Silla-Martinez, J.M., Gabaldón, T.: trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 25(15), 1972–1973 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Castresana, J.: Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17(4), 540–552 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chang, J.M., Tommaso, P.D., Notredame, C.: TCS: a new multiple sequence alignment reliability measure to estimate alignment accuracy and improve phylogenetic tree reconstruction. Mol. Biol. Evol. 31, 1625–1637 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. DeBlasio, D., Kececioglu, J.: Ensemble multiple sequence alignment via advising. In: Proceedings of the 6th ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, and Health Informatics (BCB), pp. 452–461 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. DeBlasio, D.F., Kececioglu, J.D.: Learning parameter sets for alignment advising. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, and Health Informatics (BCB), pp. 230–239 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. DeBlasio, D.F., Wheeler, T.J., Kececioglu, J.D.: Estimating the accuracy of multiple alignments and its use in parameter advising. In: Chor, B. (ed.) RECOMB 2012. LNCS, vol. 7262, pp. 45–59. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Dress, A.W., Flamm, C., Fritzsch, G., Grünewald, S., Kruspe, M., Prohaska, S.J., Stadler, P.F.: Noisy: identification of problematic columns in multiple sequence alignments. Algorithms Mol. Biol. 3(7) (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Durbin, R., Eddy, S.R., Krogh, A., Mitchison, G.: Biological Sequence Analysis: Probablistic Models of Proteins and Nucleic Acids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Edgar, R.C.: BENCH, January 2009. drive5.com/bench

  11. Edgar, R.C.: MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinform. 5(113), 1–19 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jones, D.T.: Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices. J. Mol. Biol. 292(2), 195–202 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jones, E., Oliphant, T., Peterson, P., et al.: SciPy: open source scientific tools for Python (2001). http://www.scipy.org

  14. Katoh, K., Kuma, K.I., Toh, H., Miyata, T.: MAFFT ver. 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment. Nucleic Acids Res. 33(2), 511–518 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kececioglu, J., DeBlasio, D.: Accuracy estimation and parameter advising for protein multiple sequence alignment. J. Comput. Biol. 20(4), 259–279 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kück, P., Meusemann, K., Dambach, J., et al.: Parametric and non-parametric masking of randomness in sequence alignments can be improved and leads to better resolved trees. Front. Zool. 7(10), 1–10 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sela, I., Ashkenazy, H., Katoh, K., Pupko, T.: GUIDANCE2: accurate detection of unreliable alignment regions accounting for the uncertainty of multiple parameters. Nucleic Acids Res. 43(W1), W7–W14 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sievers, F., et al.: Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol. Syst. Biol. 7(1), 539 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wheeler, T.J., Kececioglu, J.D.: Multiple alignment by aligning alignments. Bioinformatics 23(13), i559–i568 (2007). Proceedings of ISMB 2007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wheeler, T.J., Kececioglu, J.D.: Opal: software for sum-of-pairs multiple sequence alignment, January 2012. http://opal.cs.arizona.edu

  21. Wu, M., Chatterji, S., Eisen, J.A.: Accounting for alignment uncertainty in phylogenomics. PLoS One 7(1), e30288 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by NSF grant IIS-1217886 to J.K.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dan DeBlasio .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

DeBlasio, D., Kececioglu, J. (2016). Predicting Core Columns of Protein Multiple Sequence Alignments for Improved Parameter Advising. In: Frith, M., Storm Pedersen, C. (eds) Algorithms in Bioinformatics. WABI 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9838. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43681-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43681-4_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43680-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-43681-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics