[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

Web 2.0 and Personal Knowledge Management: A Framework of Skills for Effectiveness

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Social Knowledge Management in Action

Part of the book series: Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning ((IAKM,volume 3))

  • 1403 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter explores the benefits and challenges that Web 2.0 tools present to knowledge workers and proposes a framework of personal knowledge management (PKM) skills to foster effectiveness in Web 2.0 settings. Research into Web 2.0 in the enterprise has focused primarily at the organizational level. Although the importance of individual knowledge workers is well known, there is limited understanding of the issues that Web 2.0 tools present for PKM and the related skills required. Our study aimed to address this gap. We interviewed six individuals from multinational software companies—three software developers and three middle managers. Our analysis combined an inductive approach with use of Avery et al. (Personal knowledge management: Framework for integration and partnership. ASCUE 2001 Conference Proceedings, North Myrtle Beach, SC, 2001) PKM skills model. Key perceived benefits of Web 2.0 were time saving, timeliness, improved collaboration, ability to locate knowledge holders, and improved communication across hierarchies and silos. Participants highlighted five main challenges: unreliable information quality, inequality of participation, lack of knowledge about the nature of technology, security risk, and fragmentation of information. They combined eight PKM skills to militate the challenges and realize the benefits of Web 2.0. We propose an adaptation of Avery et al. (Personal knowledge management: Framework for integration and partnership. ASCUE 2001 Conference Proceedings, North Myrtle Beach, SC, 2001) model that identifies eight PKM skills relevant to Web 2.0 and a framework for understanding how these promote individual performance in the context of Web 2.0. While the need for some traditional skills appears to be reduced, we found that two additional PKM skills were critical: creating and curating information and exercising time control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 87.50
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 109.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
GBP 109.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agnihotri, R., & Troutt, D. M. (2009). The effective use of technology in personal knowledge management: A framework of skills, tools and user context. Online Information Review, 33(2), 329–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajjan, H., Hartshorne, R., & Buechler, S. (2012). Investigating Web 2.0 application impacts on knowledge workers’ decisions and performance. Information Resources Management Journal, 25(4), 65–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Dabbagh, B., Sylvester, A., & Scornavacca, E. (2014). To connect or disconnect–that is the question: ICT self-discipline in the 21st century workplace. ACIS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvarado, C., Teevan, J., Ackerman, M. S., & Karger, D. (2003). Surviving the information explosion: How people find their electronic information. MIT Lab. http://haystack.csail.mit.edu/papers/alvarado.aim03.pdf.

  • Avery, S., Brooks, R., Brown, J., Dorsey, P., & O’Conner, M. (2001). Personal knowledge management: Framework for integration and partnership. ASCUE 2001 Conference Proceedings, North Myrtle Beach, SC. Retrieved April 9, 2012, from http://fits.depauw.edu/ascue/proceedings/2001/avery.html.

  • Balim, B., & Dogerlioglu, O. (2011). Usage of Web 2.0 tools for ubiquitous enterprises. The Journal of American Academy of Business, 17(1), 202–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bebensee, T., Helms, R., & Spruit, M. (2012). Exploring Web 2.0 applications as a mean of bolstering up knowledge management. The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management 9(1), 1–9. Available online at www.ejkm.com.

  • Benlian, A., & Hess, T. (2008). Supporting global software development with Web 2.0 Technologies-insights from and empirical study. AMCIS 2008 Proceedings (p. 294).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjørnson, F. O., & Dingsøyr, T. (2008). Knowledge management in software engineering: A systematic review of studied concepts, findings and research methods used. Information and Software Technology, 50(11), 1055–1068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bughin, J., & Chui, M. (2010). The rise of the networked enterprise: Web 2.0 finds its payday. McKinsey Quarterly, 4, 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burley, D., Savion, S., Peterson, M., Lotrecchiano, G., & Nia, K. N. (2009). Knowledge integration through synthetic worlds. The Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 40(1), 71–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheong, R. K., & Tsui, E. (2011). From skills and competencies to outcome-based collaborative work: Tracking a decade’s development of personal knowledge management (PKM) models. Knowledge and Process Management, 18(3), 175–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, B., & Lee, H. (2002). Knowledge management strategy and its link to knowledge creation process. Expert Systems with Applications, 23(3), 173–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chui, M., Miller, A., & Roberts, R. (2009). Six ways to make web 2.0 work. The McKinsey Quarterly. Business Technology, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, H. T., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, S. (2011). Still building the memex. Communications of the ACM, 54(2), 80–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, S., Allen, S., Raphaelson, J., Meng, E., Engleman, J., King, R., et al. (2006). Popcorn: The personal knowledge base. In Proceedings of the 6th conference on Designing Interactive Systems (pp. 150–159). ACIS.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiNucci, D. (1999). Design & new media: Fragmented future. Print, 53(4), 32–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorsey, P. A. (2000). Personal knowledge management: Educational framework for global business. Decatur, IL: Millikin University Tabor School of Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. F. (1968). The age of discontinuity. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. F. (1993). Post-capitalist society. New York: Harper Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. F. (1999a). Knowledge-worker productivity: The biggest challenge. California Management Review, 41(2), 79–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. F. (1999b). Management challenges for the 21st century. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemenn/Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efimova, L. (2004). Discovering the iceberg of knowledge work: A weblog case. Paper presented at the Fifth European Conference on Organisational Knowledge, Learning and Capabilities, Boston. Retrieved March 17–19, from http://homes.chass.utoronto.ca/~tkennedy/Courses/2P26/Efimova2004.pdf.

  • Elsweiler, D., Baillie, M., & Ruthven, I. (2011). What makes re-finding information difficult? A study of email re-finding. In Advances in information retrieval (pp. 568–579). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Eppler, M. J., & Mengis, J. (2004). The concept of information overload: A review of literature from organization science, accounting, marketing, MIS, and related disciplines. The Information Society, 20(5), 325–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frand, J., & Hixon, C. (1999). Personal knowledge management: Who, what, why, when, where, how? Working paper. http://www.anderson.ucla.edu/faculty/jason.frand/researcher/speeches/PKM.htm.

  • Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. R. (1995). Task-technology-fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 213–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennink, M. M., Hutter, I., & Bailey, A. (2011). Qualitative research methods. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, D. L., & Tochtermann, K. (2001). Personal digital libraries and knowledge management. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 7(7), 550–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyams R. (2000). 10 Skills of personal knowledge management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, T. L. (2006). Taking it personally: Personal knowledge management. VINE, 36(1), 35–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, D. H., & Kim, S. J. (2006). Framework for collaborative knowledge sharing and recommendation based on taxonomic partial reputations. Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management, 4092, 190–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirchner, K., Razmerita, L., & Nabeth, T. (2009). Personal and collective knowledge management in the Web 2.0: Two faces of knowledge management. In 9th International Conference on Innovative Internet Community Systems (pp. 15–26). Jena, Germany. http://cs.emis.de/LNI/Proceedings/Proceedings148/5.pdf.

  • Myers, M. D. (1997). Qualitative research in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 241–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. (1998). The knowledge-creating company Harvard business review on knowledge management. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Takaeuchi, N. (1995). The knowledge creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pachler, N., & Daly, C. (2009). Narrative and learning with Web 2.0 technologies: Towards a research agenda. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(1), 6–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paroutis, S., & Al Saleh, A. (2009). Determinants of knowledge sharing using Web 2.0 technologies. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(2), 52–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauleen, D. (2009). Personal knowledge management. Putting the “person” back into the knowledge equation. Online Information Review, 33(2), 221–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. W., & Snellman, K. (2004). The knowledge economy. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 199–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Razmerita, L. (2005). User modeling and personalization of knowledge management systems. In S. Y. Chen & G. D. Magoulas (Eds.), Adaptable and adaptive hypermedia. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Razmerita, L., Kirchner, K., & Sudzina, F. (2009). Personal knowledge management: The role of Web 2.0 tools for managing knowledge at individual and organizational levels. Online Information Review, 33(6), 1021–1039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ribiere, M. V., & Tuggle, D. F. (2009). Fostering innovation with KM 2.0. The Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 40(1), 90–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rus, I., & Lindvall, M. (2002). Guest editors’ introduction: Knowledge management in software engineering. IEEE Software, 3, 26–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneckenberg, D. (2009). Web 2.0 and the empowerment of knowledge workers. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(6), 509–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tredinnick, L. (2006). Web 2.0 and business. Business Information Review, 23(4), 228–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Krogh, G. (2012). How does social software change knowledge management? Toward a strategic research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 21(2), 154–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, K. (2005). Personal knowledge management: Supporting individual knowledge worker performance. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 3(3), 156–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rouhollah Fathizargaran .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fathizargaran, R., Cranefield, J. (2017). Web 2.0 and Personal Knowledge Management: A Framework of Skills for Effectiveness. In: Helms, R., Cranefield, J., van Reijsen, J. (eds) Social Knowledge Management in Action. Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning, vol 3. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45133-6_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics