Abstract
Mirativity has been gradually recognized as a distinct semantic and grammatical category whose fundamental function is to illustrate information which is new or surprising to the speaker or hearer. Each language has its mirative expressions. This paper mainly discusses the mirative use of “怎么 [zěnme]” in Mandarin Chinese. It distinguishes between “zěnme 1”, “zěnme 2” and “zěnme 3”, and points out that “zěnme 2” and “zěnme 3” can express mirative meaning. Especially, “zěnme 3”, which is grammaticalized from “zěnme 2”, can be viewed as an independent marker of mirativity in Mandarin Chinese. In addition, this paper reveals that the semantic consequence of the mirative use of “zěnme” is promoting the rhetorical question to form negative meaning.
This research is sponsored by the National Social Science Fund Major Project “Chinese parataxis characteristic research and large knowledge base and corpus construction under the background of international Chinese language education” (Approval No.: 12&ZD175). I would like to express my sincere gratitude to Li Qiang, WU Guoxiang, Liu Hongchao, Li Wanjun, Lin Tao and Liu Yuan for their suggestions to this paper.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aikhenvald, A.: Evidentiality. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2004)
Aikhenvald, A.: The Essence of Mirativity. Linguistic Typology 16, 435–485 (2012)
DeLancey, S.: Mirativity: The Grammatical Marking of Unexpected Information. Linguistic Typology 1, 33–52 (1997)
DeLancey, S.: The Mirative and Evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics 33, 369–382 (2001)
DeLancey, S.: Still Mirative after All These Years. Linguistic Typology 16, 529–564 (2012)
Hu, D.: Research of Mandarin Chinese Rhetorical Question. AnHui People’s Press, HeFei (2010). (现代汉语反问句研究, 合肥: 安徽人民出版社, 2010). (in Chinese)
Lin, Q.: Evidentiality and Mirativtity. The Third Forum of Chinese and National Language from the Perspective of Typology, Beijing Language and Culture University, BeiJing (2014). (传信和惊异, 第三届类型学视野下的汉语与民族语言研究高峰论坛, 北京语言大学, 2014). (in Chinese)
Liu, B., Yuan, Y.: On the Formation and Construal Mechanism of “Zěnme” Rhetorical Question’s Negative Meaning. Special issue (2015). (“怎么”类特指反问句否定语义的形成与识解机制, 待刊, 2015). (in Chinese)
Lü, S.: Eight Hundred Words of Modern Chinese. The Commercial Press, BeiJing (2008/1980). (现代汉语八百词, 北京: 商务印书馆, 2008/1980). (in Chinese)
Peng, K.: About “Zěnme”. Chinese Language Learning 1, 114–125 (1993). (说“怎么”, 汉语学习, 1993:114–125). (in Chinese)
Xiao, Z.: On the Semantic and Syntactic Analysis of “Zěnme 1” and “Zěnme 2”. Chinese Language Learning 2, 44–49 (2009). (in Chinese)
Yuan, Y.: On the Semantic Level and Overflow Condition of the Implicit Negation Hidden in the Chinese verbs. Studies of the Chinese Language 2, 99–113 (2012). (in Chinese)
Yuan, Y.: On the Sense Extension Mechanism and Semantic Construal Strategy of the Chinese Verb Huaiyi (怀疑). Studies in Language and Linguistics 3, 1–12 (2014). (in Chinese)
Zhu, D.: Grammar- A Textbook. The Commercial Press, BeiJing (2008/1982). (语法讲义, 北京: 商务印书馆, 2008/1982). (in Chinese)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Liu, B. (2015). The Mirative Use of “怎么[Zěnme]” in Mandarin Chinese and Its Semantic Consequence. In: Lu, Q., Gao, H. (eds) Chinese Lexical Semantics. CLSW 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9332. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27194-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27194-1_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-27193-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-27194-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)