Abstract
The extract method is a common way to shorten long methods in software development. Before developers can use tools that support the extract method, they need to invest time in identifying a suitable refactoring candidate. This paper addresses the problem of finding the most appropriate refactoring candidate for long methods written in Java. The approach determines valid refactoring candidates and ranks them using a scoring function that aims to improve readability and reduce code complexity. We use length and nesting reduction as complexity indicators. The number of parameters needed by the candidate influences the score. To suggest candidates that are consistent with the structure of the code, information such as comments and blank lines are also considered by the scoring function. We evaluate our approach to three open source systems using a user study with ten experienced developers. Our results show that they would actually apply 86 % of suggestions for an extract method refactoring.
This work was partially funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), grant “Q-Effekt, 01IS15003A”. The responsibility for this article lies with the authors.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
References
Fowler, M.: Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1999)
Kanemitsu, T., Higo, Y., Kusumoto, S.: A visualization method of program dependency graph for identifying extract method opportunity. In: Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Refactoring Tools, pp. 8–14. ACM (2011)
Marticorena, R., Lpez, C., Crespo, Y., Prez, F.J.: Refactoring generics in JAVA: a case study on extract method. In: 14th European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering (CSMR), pp. 212–221. IEEE (2010)
Martin, R.C.: Clean Code: A Handbook of Agile Software Craftsmanship. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2009)
Maruyama, K.: Automated method-extraction refactoring by using block-based slicing. In: ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, vol. 26, pp. 31–40. ACM (2001)
Murphy-Hill, E., Black, A.P.: Why don’t people use refactoring tools?. In: Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Refactoring Tools, pp. 60–61 (2007)
Murphy-Hill, E., Black, A.P.: Breaking the barriers to successful refactoring: observations and tools for extract method. In: Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 421–430. IEEE (2008)
Opdyke, W.F.: Refactoring object-oriented frameworks. Ph.D. thesis. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (1992)
Sharma, T.: Identifying extract-method refactoring candidates automatically. In: Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Refactoring Tools, pp. 50–53. ACM (2012)
Silva, D., Terra, R., Valente, M.T.: Recommending automated extract method refactorings. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Program Comprehension, pp. 146–156. ACM (2014)
Steidl, D., Eder, S.: Prioritizing maintainability defects based on refactoring recommendations. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Program Comprehension, pp. 168–176. ACM (2014)
Streitel, F.: Incremental language independent static data flow analysis. Master’s thesis, Technical University of Munich (2014)
Tsantalis, N. Chatzigeorgiou, A.: Identification of extract method refactoring opportunities. In: 13th European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering, pp. 119–128. IEEE (2009)
Wilking, D., Kahn, U.F., Kowalewski, S.: An empirical evaluation of refactoring. e-Informatica 1(1), 27–42 (2007)
Yang, L., Liu, H., Niu, Z.: Identifying fragments to be extracted from long methods. In: Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference, pp. 43–49. IEEE (2009)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Haas, R., Hummel, B. (2016). Deriving Extract Method Refactoring Suggestions for Long Methods. In: Winkler, D., Biffl, S., Bergsmann, J. (eds) Software Quality. The Future of Systems- and Software Development. SWQD 2016. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 238. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27033-3_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27033-3_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-27032-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-27033-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)