[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

What Makes Robots Social?: A User’s Perspective on Characteristics for Social Human-Robot Interaction

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Social Robotics (ICSR 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9388))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

A common description of a social robot is for it to be capable of communicating in a humanlike manner. However, a description of what communicating in a ‘humanlike manner’ means often remains unspecified. This paper provides a set of social behaviors and certain specific features social robots should possess based on user’s experience in a longitudinal home study, discusses whether robots can actually be social, and presents some recommendations to build better social robots.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Breazeal, C.L.: Designing sociable robots. MIT Press, Cambridge (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Castellano, G., Pereira, A., Leite, I., Paiva, A., McOwan, P.W.: Detecting user engagement with a robot companion using task and social interaction-based features. In: Int. Conf. on Multimodal Interfaces, Cambridge, MA, USA (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. van Dijk, J.A.G.M.: The network society. Sage Publications, London (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fong, T., Nourbakhsh, I., Dautenhahn, K.: A survey of socially interactive robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 42, 143–166 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Goffman, E.: The presentation of self in everyday life. Penguin Group, London (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  6. de Graaf, M.M.A., Ben Allouch, S. Expectation setting and personality attribution in HRI. In: Int. Conf. on Human-Robot Interaction, Bielefeld, Germany (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. de Graaf, M.M.A.: Living with robots: Investigating the user acceptance of social robots in domestic environments (thesis). University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hansen, A., Cottle, S., Negrine, R., Newbold, C.: Mass communication research methods. Palgrave Publishers, Basingstoke (1998)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Krämer, N.C., Eimler, S.N., Pütten, A.M., Payr, S.: Theory of companion: What can theoratical model contribute to applications and understanding of human-robot interaction? Applied Artificial Intelligence 25, 474–502 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kwak, S.S., Kim, Y., Kim, E., Shin, C., Cho, K.: What makes people empathize with an emotional robot?: the impact of agency and physical embodiment on human empathy for a robot. In: Int. Symp. on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Gyeongju, Korea (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Landis, J.R., Koch, G.G.: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33, 159–174 (1977)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee, K., Park, N., Song, H.: Can a robot be perceived as a developing creature? Effects of a robot’s long-term cognitive developments on its social presence and people’s social responses toward it. Human Communication Research 31, 538–563 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Leite, I., Castellano, G., Pereira, A., Martinho, C., Paiva, A.: Empathic Robots for Long-term Interaction. Int. J. of Social Robotics 6, 329–341 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Levy, D.: Love and sex with robots: The evolution of human-robot relationships. HarperCollins Publishers, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mutlu, B.: Designing embodied cues for dialog with robots. AI Magazine 32, 17–30 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Reeves, B., Nass, C.: The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. CSLI Publications, New York (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Riek, L.D., Rabinowitch, T.C., Chakrabarti, B., Robinson, P.: How anthropomorphism affects empathy toward robots. In: Int. Conf. on Human-Robot Interaction, La Jolla, CA, USA (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Severinson-Eklundh, K., Green, A., Huttenrauch, H.: Social and collaborative aspects of interaction with a service robot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 42, 223–234 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Taylor, S.J., Bogdan, R.: Introduction to qualitative research methods: The search for meanings. Wiley, New York (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Turing, A.M.: Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind 59, 433–460 (1950)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. M. A. de Graaf .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

de Graaf, M.M.A., Ben Allouch, S., van Dijk, J.A.G.M. (2015). What Makes Robots Social?: A User’s Perspective on Characteristics for Social Human-Robot Interaction. In: Tapus, A., André, E., Martin, JC., Ferland, F., Ammi, M. (eds) Social Robotics. ICSR 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9388. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25554-5_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25554-5_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-25553-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-25554-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics