Automatic Adaptation of Author’s Stylometric Features to Document Types

1. Daelemans, W.: Explanation in computational stylometry. In: Gelbukh, A. (ed.) CICLing 2013, Part II. LNCS, vol. 7817, pp. 451–462. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

   Chapter  Google Scholar 

2. Fitzgerald, J.R.: FBI’s communicated threat assessment database: History, design, and implementation. FBI: Law Enforcement Bulletin 76, 6–9 (2007)

   Google Scholar 

3. Grieve, J.W.: Quantitative authorship attribution: A history and an evaluation of technique. Master’s thesis. Simon Fraser University (2005)

   Google Scholar 

4. Hilton, O.: Scientific examination of questioned documents. Callaghan (1956)

   Google Scholar 

5. Hollingsworth, C.: Using dependency-based annotations for authorship identification. In: Sojka, P., Horák, A., Kopeček, I., Pala, K. (eds.) TSD 2012. LNCS, vol. 7499, pp. 314–319. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

   Chapter  Google Scholar 

6. Holmes, D.I.: The Analysis of Literary Style – A Review. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 148(4), 328–341 (1985)

   Article  Google Scholar 

7. Iqbal, F., Khan, L.A., Fung, B.C.M., Debbabi, M.: e-mail authorship verification for forensic investigation. In: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, SAC 2010, pp. 1591–1598. ACM Press, New York (2010)

   Google Scholar 

8. Koppel, M., Schler, J.: Authorship verification as a one-class classification problem. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-first International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2004, p. 62. ACM, New York (2004)

   Google Scholar 

9. Kovář, V., Horák, A., Jakubíček, M.: Syntactic analysis using finite patterns: A new parsing system for czech. In: Vetulani, Z. (ed.) LTC 2009. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6562, pp. 161–171. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

   Chapter  Google Scholar 

10. Love, H.: Attributing Authorship: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press (2002)

    Google Scholar 

11. Luyckx, K., Daelemans, W.: Authorship attribution and verification with many authors and limited data. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics COLING 2008, vol. 1, pp. 513–520. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg (2008)

    Google Scholar 

12. McMenamin, G.R., Choi, D.: Forensic Linguistics: Advances in Forensic Stylistics. Crc Press (2002)

    Google Scholar 

13. Morton, A.Q., Michaelson, S.: The Q-Sum Plot. Technical report, Department of Computer Science, University of Edinburgh, CSR-3-90 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

14. Pearl, L., Steyvers, M.: Detecting authorship deception: a supervised machine learning approach using author writeprints. LLC 27(2), 183–196 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

15. Rygl, J., Horák, A.: Authorship Attribution: Comparison of Single-layer and Double-layer Machine Learning. In: Sojka, P., Horák, A., Kopeček, I., Pala, K. (eds.) TSD 2012. LNCS, vol. 7499, pp. 282–289. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

16. Rygl, J., Zemková, K., Kovář, V.: Authorship Verification based on Syntax Features. In: Proceedings of Sixth Workshop on Recent Advances in Slavonic Natural Language Processing, RASLAN 2012, 1st edn., Tribun EU, Brno, Czech Republic, pp. 111–119 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

17. Simpson, E.H.: Measurement of diversity. Nature 163, 688 (1949)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

18. van Halteren, H.: Linguistic profiling for author recognition and verification. In: Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2004. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references