Abstract
This paper presents a critical account of the current state of design science research (DSR) of socio-technical artifacts in the information systems discipline as viewed through a postmodern lens. The paper offers a novel perspective to reflect on DSR and socio-technical artifacts, especially in terms of their limitations and boundaries of application. To achieve this, I critically appraise the current state of DSR practices, based on postmodern researchers’ key stances. The findings offer new perspectives on artifact effects, their application contexts, artifact utility, artifact audiences, the roles of the languages in which artifacts are specified, the design researcher’s role in the DSR process, and the political dimension of artifact design and evaluation. Design science researchers working on all types of socio-technical artifacts can use this paper’s findings to reflect on their artifacts’ limitations and potential real-world consequences before, during, and after artifact design and instantiation, and to subsequently improve these artifacts.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gregor, S., Hevner, A.R.: Positioning and Presenting Design Science Research for Maximum Impact. MIS Q. 37, 337–A6 (2013)
Gill, G., Hevner, A.R.: A Fitness-Utility Model for Design Science Research. ACM Trans. Manag. Inf. Syst. 4, 5:1–5:24 (2013)
Gregor, S., Jones, D.: The Anatomy of a Design Theory. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 8, 312–335 (2007)
Hevner, A., Chatterjee, S.: Design Research in Information Systems: Theory and Practice. Springer, New York (2010)
Hevner, A., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design Science in Information Sys-tems Research. MIS Q. 28, 75–105 (2004)
Kuechler, W., Vaishnavi, V.: A Framework for Theory Development in Design Science Research: Multiple Perspectives. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 13, 395–423 (2012)
Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M., Chatterjee, S.: A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 24, 45–77 (2007)
Vaishnavi, V., Kuechler, W.: Design Science Research Methods and Patterns. Auerbach, Boca Raton (2008)
Pries-Heje, J., Baskerville, R., Venable, J.: Strategies for Design Science Research Evaluation. In: Proc. ECIS 2008 Conf. Galway Irel (2008)
Peffers, K., Rothenberger, M., Tuunanen, T., Vaezi, R.: Design science research evaluation. In: Peffers, K., Rothenberger, M., Kuechler, B. (eds.) DESRIST 2012. LNCS, vol. 7286, pp. 398–410. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Venable, J., Pries-Heje, J., Baskerville, R.: FEDS: A Framework for Evaluation in Design Science Research. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. (2014)
Lee, A.S.: Integrating Positivist and Interpretive Approaches to Organizational Research. Organ. Sci. 2, 342–365 (1991)
Mingers, J.: Combining IS Research Methods: Towards a Pluralist Methodology. Inf. Syst. Res. 12, 240–259 (2001)
Mingers, J.: Real-izing Information Systems: Critical Realism as an Underpin-ning Philosophy for Information Systems. Inf. Organ. 14, 87–103 (2004)
Wynn, D., Williams, C.: Principles for Conducting Critical Realist Case Study Research in Information Systems. Manag. Inf. Syst. Q. 36, 787–810 (2012)
Zachariadis, M., Scott, S., Barrett, M.: Methodological Implications of Critical Realism for Mixed-Methods Research. MIS Q. 37, 855–879 (2013)
Hirschheim, R., Klein, H.K.: Four paradigms of information systems develop-ment. Commun ACM 32, 1199–1216 (1989)
Venkatesh, V., Brown, S.A., Bala, H.: Bridging the Qualitative-Quantitative Divide: Guidelines for Conducting Mixed Method Research in Information Systems. MIS Q. 37, 21–54 (2013)
Stahl, B.C.: The Ideology of Design: A Critical Appreciation of the Design Sci-ence Discourse in Information Systems and Wirtschaftsinformatik. In: Becker, J., Krcmar, H., Niehaves, B. (eds.) Wissenschaftstheorie und gestaltungsorientierte Wirtschaftsinformatik, pp. 111–132. Physica-Verlag HD, , Heidelberg (2009)
Alvesson, M., Sköldberg, K.: Reflexive Methodology - New Vistas for Qualitative Research. Sage, London (2009)
Whetten, D.A.: What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Acad. Manage. Rev. 14, 490–495 (1989)
Weber, R.: Evaluating and Developing Theories in the Information Systems Discipline. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 13 (2012)
Chatterjee, S., Price, A.: Healthy Living with Persuasive Technologies: Frame-work, Issues, and Challenges. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. JAMIA. 16, 171–178 (2009)
Maccani, G., Donnellan, B., Helfert, M.: Action Design Research in Practice: The Case of Smart Cities. In: Tremblay, M.C., VanderMeer, D., Rothenberger, M., Gupta, A., and Yoon, V. (eds.) Advancing the Impact of Design Science: Moving from Theory to Practice, pp. 132–147. Springer International Publishing (2014)
Jencks, C.: The language of post-modern architecture. Academy Editions, London (1987)
Chatterjee, S., Sarker, S., Fuller, M.: Ethical Information Systems Development: A Baumanian Postmodernist Perspective. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 10, 787–815 (2009)
Kreps, D.: My social networking profile: copy, resemblance, or simulacrum? A poststructuralist interpretation of social information systems. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 19, 104–115 (2010)
Kroeze, J.H.: Interpretivism in Information Systems: A Postmodern Epistemology?, http://sprouts.aisnet.org/11-171/
Krupnick, M.: Introduction. In: Krupnick, M. (ed.) Displacement: Derrida and after. Indiana University Press, Bloomington (1983)
Derrida, J.: Writing and difference. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1978)
Derrida, J.: Margins of philosophy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1982)
Lyotard, J.-F.: The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. University Of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis (1984)
Feyerabend, P.: Against method: outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge. New Left Books, London (1975)
Weedon, C.: Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory. B. Blackwell, Oxford (1987)
Foucault, M.: Power/knowledge: selected interviews and other writings, pp. 1972–1977. Pantheon Books, New York (1980)
Collinson, D.L.: Identities and Insecurities: Selves at Work. Organization 10, 527–547 (2003)
Willmott, H.: Bringing agency (back) into organizational analysis: responding to the crisis of (post)modernity. Postmodernism and organizations, pp. 114–131. SAGE Publications, London (1993)
Brown, R.H.: Rhetoric, textuality, and the postmodern turn in sociological theory. Sociol. Theory 8, 188–197 (1990)
Rosenau, P.V.: Post-modernism and the social sciences: insights, inroads, and intrusions. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1992)
Sköldberg, K.: The poetic logic of administration: styles and changes of style in the art of organizing. Routledge, London (2002)
Richardson, J.: Writing: a method of inquiry. In: Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y.S. (eds.) Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2000)
Linstead, S.: From Postmodern Anthropology to Deconstructive Ethnography. Hum. Relat. 46, 97–120 (1993)
Peltzman, S.: The effects of automobile safety regulation. J. Polit. Econ., 677–725 (1975)
Pandza, K., Thorpe, R.: Management as Design, but What Kind of Design? An Appraisal of the Design Science Analogy for Management. Br. J. Manag. 21, 171–186 (2010)
Sein, M., Henfridsson, O., Purao, S., Rossi, M., Lindgren, R.: Action Design Research. MIS Q. 35, 17–56 (2011)
Seidel, S., Recker, J., Vom Brocke, J.: Sensemaking and sustainable practicing: functional affordances of information systems in green transformations. Mis Q. 37, 1275–1299 (2013)
Frank, U.: Die Konstruktion möglicher Welten als Chance und Herausforderung der Wirtschaftsinformatik. In: Becker, J., Krcmar, H., Niehaves, B. (eds.) Wissenschaftstheorie und gestaltungsorientierte Wirtschaftsinformatik, pp. 161–173. Physica-Verlag HD, Heidelberg (2009)
Hevner, A.R., Webb Collins, R., Davis, C., Gill, T.G.: A NeuroDesign Model for IS Research. Informing Sci. 17 (2014)
Boland, R., Collopy, F.: Managing as designing. Stanford University Press (2004)
Bunge, M.: Scientific Research II: The Search for Truth. Springer, Berlin (1967)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Drechsler, A. (2015). A Postmodern Perspective on Socio-technical Design Science Research in Information Systems. In: Donnellan, B., Helfert, M., Kenneally, J., VanderMeer, D., Rothenberger, M., Winter, R. (eds) New Horizons in Design Science: Broadening the Research Agenda. DESRIST 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9073. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18714-3_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18714-3_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-18713-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-18714-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)