Cryptanalysis of Ascon

1. Aumasson, J.P., Meier, W.: Zero-sum distinguishers for reduced Keccak-\(f\) and for the core functions of Luffa and Hamsi. CHES rump session (2009)

   Google Scholar 

2. Bertoni, G., Daemen, J., Peeters, M., Van Assche, G.: Keccak Specifications. Submission to NIST (Round 3) (2011). http://keccak.noekeon.org

3. Biere, A.: Lingeling, Plingeling and Treengeling entering the SAT Competition 2013. In: Balint, A., Belov, A., Heule, M., Järvisalo, M. (eds.) SAT competition 2013. vol. B-2013-1, pp. 51–52 (2013). http://fmv.jku.at/lingeling/

4. Biham, E., Dunkelman, O., Keller, N.: Enhancing Differential-Linear Cryptanalysis. In: Zheng, Y. (ed.) ASIACRYPT 2002. LNCS, vol. 2501, pp. 254–266. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

   Google Scholar 

5. Biham, E., Shamir, A.: Differential Cryptanalysis of DES-like Cryptosystems. In: Menezes, A., Vanstone, S.A. (eds.) CRYPTO 1990. LNCS, vol. 537, pp. 2–21. Springer, Heidelberg (1991)

   Google Scholar 

6. Boura, C., Canteaut, A.: A zero-sum property for the Keccak-\(f\) permutation with 18 rounds. In: IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory, pp. 2488–2492. IEEE (2010)

   Google Scholar 

7. Boura, C., Canteaut, A., De Cannière, C.: Higher-order differential properties of keccak and Luffa. In: Joux, A. (ed.) FSE 2011. LNCS, vol. 6733, pp. 252–269. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

   Google Scholar 

8. Daemen, J.: Permutation-based Encryption. Authentication and Authenticated Encryption, DIAC - Directions in Authenticated Ciphers (2012)

   Google Scholar 

9. Dinur, I., Morawiecki, P., Pieprzyk, J., Srebrny, M., Straus, M.: Cube Attacks and Cube-attack-like Cryptanalysis on the Round-reduced Keccak Sponge Function. IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive 2014, 736 (2014). http://eprint.iacr.org/2014/736

10. Dinur, I., Shamir, A.: Cube Attacks on Tweakable Black Box Polynomials. In: Joux, A. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 2009. LNCS, vol. 5479, pp. 278–299. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

11. Dobraunig, C., Eichlseder, M., Mendel, F., Schläffer, M.: Ascon. Submission to the CAESAR competition (2014). http://ascon.iaik.tugraz.at

12. Dunkelman, O., Indesteege, S., Keller, N.: A Differential-Linear Attack on 12-Round Serpent. In: Chowdhury, D.R., Rijmen, V., Das, A. (eds.) INDOCRYPT 2008. LNCS, vol. 5365, pp. 308–321. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Google Scholar 

13. Ganesh, V., Dill, D.L.: A decision procedure for bit-vectors and arrays. In: Damm, W., Hermanns, H. (eds.) CAV 2007. LNCS, vol. 4590, pp. 519–531. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

14. Huang, T., Wu, H., Tjuawinata, I.: Practical State Recovery Attack on ICEPOLE. http://www3.ntu.edu.sg/home/huangtao/icepole/icepole_attack.pdf

15. Jovanovic, P., Luykx, A., Mennink, B.: Beyond 2\(^{\mathit{c}/2}\) Security in Sponge-Based Authenticated Encryption Modes. In: Sarkar, P., Iwata, T. (eds.) ASIACRYPT 2014. LNCS, vol. 8873, pp. 85–104. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

16. Langford, S.K.: Differential-linear cryptanalysis and threshold signatures. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University (1995)

    Google Scholar 

17. Langford, S.K., Hellman, M.E.: Differential-linear cryptanalysis. In: Desmedt, Y.G. (ed.) CRYPTO 1994. LNCS, vol. 839, pp. 17–25. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)

    Google Scholar 

18. Matsui, M., Yamagishi, A.: A New Method for Known Plaintext Attack of FEAL Cipher. In: Rueppel, R.A. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 1992. LNCS, vol. 658, pp. 81–91. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)

    Google Scholar 

19. National Institute of Standards and Technology: FIPS PUB 180–4: Secure Hash Standard. Federal Information Processing Standards Publication 180–4, U.S. Department of Commerce (March 2012). http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/fips/fips180-4/fips-180-4.pdf

20. The CAESAR committee: CAESAR: Competition for authenticated encryption: Security, applicability, and robustness (2014). http://competitions.cr.yp.to/caesar.html

Download references