Audiovisual Communication

1. Aldridge R, Davidoff J, Ghanbari M, Hands D, Pearson D (1995) Recency effect in the subjective assessment of digitally-coded television pictures. In: Image processing and its applications, pp 336–339

   Google Scholar 

2. Ariely D (1998) Combining experiences over time: the effects of duration, intensity changes and on-line measurements on retrospective pain evaluations. J Behav Decis Making 11:19–45

   Article  Google Scholar 

3. Beerends FE (1999) The influence of video quality on perceived audio quality and vice versa. J Audio Eng Soc 47(5):355–362

   Google Scholar 

4. Belmudez B, Lewcio B, Möller S (2013) Call quality prediction for audiovisual time-varying impairments using simulated conversational structures. In: To appear in Acta Acustica united with Acustica

   Google Scholar 

5. Clark AD (2001) Modeling the effects of burst packet loss and recency on subjective voice quality. In: Internet telephony workshop, pp 123–127

   Google Scholar 

6. Fredrickson BL, Kahneman D (1993) Duration neglect in retrospective evaluations of affective episodes. J Pers Soc Psychol 65:45–55

   Article  Google Scholar 

7. Fredrickson BL (2000) Extracting meaning from past affective experiences: the importance of peaks, ends, and specific emotions. Cogn Emot 14(4):577–606

   Article  Google Scholar 

8. Gros L, Chateau N (2001) Instantaneous and overall judgements for time-varying speech quality: assessments and relationships. Acta Acustica Unit Acustica 87(3):367–377

   Google Scholar 

9. Hamberg R, De Ridder H (1999) Time-varying image quality: modeling the relation between instantaneous and overall quality. SMTPE J 108:802–811

   Google Scholar 

10. Hands DS, Avons SE (2001) Recency and duration neglect in subjective assessment of television picture quality. Appl Cogn Psychol 15(6):639–657

    Article  Google Scholar 

11. Hollier MP, Voelcker R (1997) Objective performance assessment: video quality as an influence on audio perception. In: Audio engineering society convention 103

    Google Scholar 

12. ITU-R Recommendation BT.1359-1 (1998) Relative timing of sound and vision for broadcasting. International Telecommunication Union, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

13. ITU-R Recommendation J.100 (1990) Tolerances for transmission time differences between the vision and sound components of a television signal. International Telecommunication Union, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

14. ITU-T Contribution COM 12–61-E (1998) Study of the influence of experimental context on the relationship between audio, video and audiovisual subjective qualities. International Telecommunication Union, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

15. ITU-T Contribution COM 12–D64-E (1998) Testing the quality of connections having time varying impairments. International Telecommunication Union, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

16. ITU-T Recommendation G.107.1 (2011) Wideband E-model. International Telecommunication Union, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

17. ITU-T Recommendation G.107 (2005) The E-model, a computational model for use in transmission planning. International Telecommunication Union, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

18. ITU-T Recommendation G.1070 (2007) Opinion model for video-telephony applications. International Telecommunication Union, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

19. ITU-T Recommendation G.114 (2003) One-way transmission delay. International Telecommunication Union, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

20. ITU-T Recommendation P.1201 (2012) Parametric non-intrusive assessment of audiovisual media streaming quality. International Telecommunication Union, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

21. ITU-T Recommendation J.247 (2008) Objective perceptual multimedia video quality measurement in the presence of a full reference. International Telecommunication Union, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

22. ITU-T Recommendation J.341 (2011) Objective perceptual multimedia video quality measurement of HDTV for digital cable television in the presence of a full reference. International Telecommunication Union, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

23. ITU-T Recommendation P.800 (1996) Methods for subjective determination of transmission quality. International Telecommunication Union, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

24. ITU-T Recommendation P.805 (2007) Subjective evaluation of conversational quality. International Telecommunication Union, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

25. ITU-T Recommendation P.863 (2011) Perceptual objective listening quality assessment. International Telecommunication Union, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

26. ITU-T Recommendation P.910 (2008) Subjective video quality assessment methods for multimedia applications. International Telecommunication Union, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

27. ITU-T Recommendation P.911 (1998) Subjective audiovisual quality assessment methods for multimedia applications. International Telecommunication Union, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

28. ITU-T Recommendation P.920 (2000) Interactive test methods for audiovisual communications. International Telecommunication Union, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

29. Joly A, Montard N, Buttin M (2001) Audio-visual quality and interactions between television audio and video. In: 6th International symposium on signal processing and its applications 2001, vol 2

    Google Scholar 

30. Jumisko-Pyykkö S (2008) I would like to see the subtitles and the face or at least hear the voice: effects of picture ratio and audio-video bitrate ratio on perception of quality in mobile television. Multimedia Tools Appl 36:167–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

31. Kirk D, Sellen A, Cao X (2010) Home video communication: mediating ‘closeness’. In: Proceedings of CSCW 2010, ACM. pp 135–144

    Google Scholar 

32. Kitawaki N, Itok K (1991) Pure delay effects on speech quality in telecommunications. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 9(9):586–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

33. Korhonen J, Reitel U, Myakotnukh E (2010) On the relative importance of audio and video in the presence of packet losses. In: 2nd International workshop on quality of multimedia experience (QoMEX)

    Google Scholar 

34. Nature journal: public television in Germany, Nature, 127:391–391, 7th March 1936. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v137/n3462/abs/137391a0.html

35. Pinson MH, Ingram W, Webster A (2011) Audiovisual quality components. IEEE Sig Process Mag 28(6):60–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

36. Raake A, Schoenenberg K, Skowronek J, Egger S (2013) Predicting speech quality based on interactivity and delay. In: Proceedings of Interspeech, 25–29 August, Lyon, France

    Google Scholar 

37. Rimell AN, Hollier MP, Voelcker RM (1998) The influence of cross-modal interaction on audio-visual speech quality perception. In: Audio engineering society convention 105

    Google Scholar 

38. Schreiber CA, Kahneman D (2000) Determinants of the remembered utility of aversive sounds. J Exp Psychol Gen

    Google Scholar 

39. Steinmetz R (1996) Human perception of jitter and media synchronization. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 14(1):61–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

40. Weiss B, Möller S, Raake A, Berger J, Ullmann R (2009) Modeling call quality for time-varying transmission characteristics using simulated conversational structures. Acta Acustica Unit Acustica 95(6):1140–1151

    Article  Google Scholar 

41. Wickens CD (1992) Engineering psychology and human performance. HarperCollins

    Google Scholar 

42. Winkler S, Faller C (2006) Perceived audiovisual quality of low-bitrate multimedia content. IEEE Trans Multimedia 8(5):973–980

    Article  Google Scholar 

43. Yamagishi K, Hayashi T (2005) Analysis of psychological factors for quality assessment of interactive multimodal service. Hum Vision Electron Imaging X (SPIE) 5666(1):130–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

44. You J, Reiter U, Hannuksela M, Gabbouj M, Perkis A (2010) Perceptual-based quality assessment for audio-visual services: a survey. Image Commun 25:482–501

    Google Scholar 

Download references