Abstract
Modern software systems are typically built of components that communicate through their external interfaces. The external behavior of a component can be effectively described using finite state automata-based formalisms. Such component models can then used for varied analyses. For example, interface automata, which model the behavior of components in terms of component states and transitions between them, can be used to check whether the resulting system is compatible. By contrast, partial-behavior modeling formalisms, such as modal transition systems, can be used to capture and then verify properties of sets of prospective component implementations that satisfy an incomplete requirements specification. In this paper, we study how pairwise compatibility should be defined for partial-behavior models. To this end, we describe the limitations of the existing compatibility definitions, propose a set of novel compatibility notions for modal interface automata, and propose efficient, correct, and complete compatibility checking procedures
This work was partially supported by grants ERC PBM-FIMBSE, ANPCYT PICT 2012-0724, UBACYT W0813, ANPCYT PICT 2011-1774, UBACYT F075, CONICET PIP 11220110100596CO, MEALS 295261, and U.S. NSF awards 0905665, 1117593, 1218115, and 1321141, and Infosys Technologies, Ltd. The work has been done while Ivo Krka was a PhD candidate at the University of Southern California.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
de Alfaro, L., Henzinger, T.A.: Interface automata. In: ESEC/FSE (2001)
Bauer, S.S., Mayer, P., Schroeder, A., Hennicker, R.: On weak modal compatibility, refinement, and the MIO workbench. In: Esparza, J., Majumdar, R. (eds.) TACAS 2010. LNCS, vol. 6015, pp. 175–189. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Classen, A., Cordy, M., Schobbens, P., Heymans, P., Legay, A., Raskin, J.: Featured transition systems: Foundations for verifying variability-intensive systems and their application to LTL model checking 39(8) (2012)
D’Ippolito, N., Braberman, V., Piterman, N., Uchitel, S.: The modal transition system control problem. In: Giannakopoulou, D., Méry, D. (eds.) FM 2012. LNCS, vol. 7436, pp. 155–170. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Fischbein, D., D’Ippolito, N., Brunet, G., Chechik, M., Uchitel, S.: Weak Alphabet Merging of Partial Behaviour Models. ACM TOSEM 21(2) (2012)
Fischbein, D., Uchitel, S.: On correct and complete strong merging of partial behaviour models. In: FSE (2008)
Harel, D.: Statecharts: A visual formalism for complex systems. Sci. of Comp. Prog. (1987)
Keller, R.M.: Formal verification of parallel programs. Com. of the ACM (1976)
Krka, I., Brun, Y., Edwards, G., Medvidovic, N.: Synthesizing Partial Component-level Behavior Models from System Specifications. In: ESEC/FSE (2009)
Krka, I., Medvidovic, N.: Revisiting modal interface automata. In: FORMSERA (2012)
Krka, I., Medvidovic, N.: Distributing refinements of a system-level partial behavior model. In: RE (2013)
Krka, I., Medvidovic, N.: Component-aware triggered scenarios. In: WICSA (Submitted)
Larsen, K.G., Nyman, U., Wąsowski, A.: Modal I/O automata for interface and product line theories. In: De Nicola, R. (ed.) ESOP 2007. LNCS, vol. 4421, pp. 64–79. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Larsen, K.G., Thomsen, B.: A Modal Process Logic. In: LICS (1988)
Larsen, K.G., Xinxin, L.: Equation solving using modal transition systems. In: LICS (1990)
Lynch, N.A., Tuttle, M.R.: Hierarchical correctness proofs for distributed algorithms. In: PODC 1987 (1987)
Magee, J., Kramer, J.: Concurrency: State Models & Java Programs (2006)
Raclet, J.B., Badouel, E., Benveniste, A., Caillaud, B., Legay, A., Passerone, R.: Modal interfaces: unifying interface automata and modal specifications. In: EMSOFT (2009)
Sibay, G.E., Braberman, V.A., Uchitel, S., Kramer, J.: Synthesising modal transition systems from triggered scenarios. IEEE TSE (2013)
Sibay, G.E., Uchitel, S., Braberman, V., Kramer, J.: Distribution of modal transition systems. In: Giannakopoulou, D., Méry, D. (eds.) FM 2012. LNCS, vol. 7436, pp. 403–417. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Uchitel, S., Brunet, G., Chechik, M.: Synthesis of Partial Behavior Models from Properties and Scenarios. IEEE TSE 35(3) (2009)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Krka, I., D’Ippolito, N., Medvidović, N., Uchitel, S. (2014). Revisiting Compatibility of Input-Output Modal Transition Systems. In: Jones, C., Pihlajasaari, P., Sun, J. (eds) FM 2014: Formal Methods. FM 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8442. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06410-9_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06410-9_26
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-06409-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-06410-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)