[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

An Analysis of the Sense of Presence and Cybersickness in Virtual Reality: The Influence of Content Type, Exposure Time, and Gender

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality (HCII 2024)

Abstract

As the adoption of XR progressively grows across diverse domains, it is paramount to delve into the factors that can affect the user experience while using XR technology. The purpose of this research was to understand the influence of content type, exposure time, and gender on presence and cybersickness within the context of virtual reality experiences. The evaluation was conducted with a sample of 20 participants who were randomly exposed to four content types: a digital game, a simulator, a synthetic cultural environment, and a 360-degree video. No significant changes regarding global presence were observed. However, upon analysing its subdimensions, the values indicate a correlation between content type and both spatial presence and experienced realism. Gender disparities were detected, with male participants considering the digital game less realistic compared to other content types, while female participants scored it on par with the others. Moreover, the total exposure time positively correlated with higher global presence for female participants, with a difference also being observed in terms of experienced realism. Regarding cybersickness, the correlation between gender and total exposure time indicated that female participants reported less cybersickness as exposure time increased. The research conducted, currently entering a second phase in which the same type of content will be tested across different head-mounted displays, has provided relevant results that are already being applied to other studies focused on virtual reality experiences, such as the therapeutic use of the technology by users diagnosed with phobias or neurocognitive disorders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 89.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 59.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. LaValle, S.M.: Virtual Reality. Cambridge University Press (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Frederiksen, J.G., et al.: Cognitive load and performance in immersive virtual reality versus conventional virtual reality simulation training of laparoscopic surgery: a randomized trial. Surg. Endosc. 34, 1244–1252 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06887-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Harrington, C.M., et al.: 360° operative videos: a randomised cross-over study evaluating attentiveness and information retention. J. Surg. Educ. 75, 993–1000 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.10.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Reisinho, P., Raposo, R., Zagalo, N., Ribeiro, O.: Interactive Narrative in virtual Reminiscence Therapy to Stimulate Memory and communication in People with Dementia (2024)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Narciso, D., Bessa, M., Melo, M., Coelho, A., Vasconcelos-Raposo, J.: Immersive 360° video user experience: impact of different variables in the sense of presence and cybersickness. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 18, 77–87 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-017-0581-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Melo, M., Vasconcelos-Raposo, J., Bessa, M.: Presence and cybersickness in immersive content: effects of content type. Expo. Time Gender. Comput. Graph. 71, 159–165 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2017.11.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Milgram, P., Kishino, F.: Taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE Trans. Inf. Syst. 12, 1321–1329 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jerald, J.: The VR book: human-centered design for virtual reality. Assoc. Comput. Mach. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2792790.2792814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Azuma, R.T.: A survey of augmented reality. Virtual Augment. Real. 6, 355–385 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1997.6.4.355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rauschnabel, P.A., Felix, R., Hinsch, C., Shahab, H., Alt, F.: What is XR? Towards a framework for augmented and virtual reality. Comput. Hum. Behav. 133, 107289 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Coelho, C., Tichon, J., Hine, T.J., Wallis, G., Riva, G.: Media presence and inner presence: the sense of presence in virtual reality technologies. IOS Press (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Slater, M., Wilbur, S.: A framework for immersive virtual environments (FIVE): speculations on the role of presence in virtual environments. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 6, 603–616 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1997.6.6.603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper & Row (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Murray, J.H.: Hamlet on the Holodeck: The Future of Narrative in Cyberspace. The Free Press (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Weech, S., Kenny, S., Barnett-Cowan, M.: Presence and cybersickness in virtual reality are negatively related: a review. Front. Psychol. 10 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00158

  16. Caserman, P., Garcia-Agundez, A., Gámez Zerban, A., Göbel, S.: Cybersickness in current-generation virtual reality head-mounted displays: systematic review and outlook. Virtual Real. 25, 1153–1170 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-021-00513-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Beat Games: Beat Saber. https://www.oculus.com/experiences/quest/2448060205267927/

  18. Oculus: Mission: ISS. https://www.oculus.com/experiences/quest/2094303753986147/

  19. FSDesign: Talasnal House VR. https://www.meta.com/experiences/5315654131846251/

  20. Reis, F.: S. Gonçalinho VR Experience. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TQhS5MEXkwE

  21. Meta: Quest 2. https://store.facebook.com/quest/products/quest-2/

  22. Schubert, T., Friedmann, F., Regenbrecht, H.: The experience of presence: factor analytic insights. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 10, 266–281 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1162/105474601300343603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Vasconcelos-Raposo, J., et al.: Adaptation and validation of the Igroup presence questionnaire (IPQ) in a Portuguese sample. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 25, 191–203 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1162/PRES_a_00261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Schubert, T., Friedmann, F., Regenbrecht, H.: Igroup Presence Questionnaire (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kennedy, R.S., Lane, N.E., Berbaum, K.S., Lilienthal, M.G.: Simulator sickness questionnaire: an enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. Int. J. Aviat. Psychol. 3, 203–220 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327108ijap0303_3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kilteni, K., Groten, R., Slater, M.: The sense of embodiment in virtual reality. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 21, 373–387 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1162/PRES_a_00124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kelly, J.W., Gilbert, S.B., Dorneich, M.C., Costabile, K.A.: Gender differences in cybersickness: clarifying confusion and identifying paths forward. In: Proceedings - 2023 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops, pp. 283–288 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/VRW58643.2023.00067

  28. Dudley, J., Yin, L., Garaj, V., Kristensson, P.O.: Inclusive immersion: a review of efforts to improve accessibility in virtual reality, augmented reality and the metaverse. Virtual Real. 27, 2989–3020 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-023-00850-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Baker, L., Ventura, J., Langlotz, T., Gul, S., Mills, S., Zollmann, S.: Localization and tracking of stationary users for augmented reality. Vis. Comput. 40, 227–244 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00371-023-02777-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Silva, C., Zagalo, N., Vairinhos, M.: Towards participatory activities with augmented reality for cultural heritage: a literature review. Comput. Educ. X Real. 3, 100044 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cexr.2023.100044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Reisinho, P., Silva, C., Vairinhos, M., Oliveira, A.P., Zagalo, N.: Tangible interfaces and augmented reality in a nutrition serious game for kids. In: 2021 IEEE 9th International Conference on Serious Games and Applications for Health (SeGAH), pp. 1–8 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/SEGAH52098.2021.9551852

  32. Martins, S., Vairinhos, M.: Ludic and narrative immersion in virtual reality exposure therapy to animal phobias: a systematic literature review. Virtual Worlds 2, 303–325 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/virtualworlds2040018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Reisinho, P., Raposo, R., Zagalo, N.: A systematic literature review of virtual reality-based reminiscence therapy for people with cognitive impairment or dementia. In: 2022 International Conference on Interactive Media, Smart Systems and Emerging Technologies (IMET), pp. 1–8 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/IMET54801.2022.9930000

  34. Grassini, S., Laumann, K.: Questionnaire measures and physiological correlates of presence: a systematic review. Front. Psychol. 11 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00349

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by national funds through FCT – Foundation for Science and Technology, I.P., under the Grant Agreements No. 2021.06634.BD, 2021.07253.BD, and 2022.10675.BD and Project UIDB/05460/2020.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pedro Reisinho .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Ethics declarations

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Appendix

Appendix

figure a

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Reisinho, P., Silva, C., Ferreira, M., Raposo, R., Vairinhos, M., Zagalo, N. (2024). An Analysis of the Sense of Presence and Cybersickness in Virtual Reality: The Influence of Content Type, Exposure Time, and Gender. In: Chen, J.Y.C., Fragomeni, G. (eds) Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality. HCII 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14707. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61044-8_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61044-8_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-61043-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-61044-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics