[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

Motivational Dynamics and Platform Design in Online Communities of Teachers: A Multi-case Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Collaboration Technologies and Social Computing (CollabTech 2024)

Abstract

A multi-case study with three online communities that use customized instantiations of the Integrated Learning Design Environment (ILDE) platform is presented to explore and understand how teachers’ motivations to participate in OCs are related to their perceptions about incentives and features implemented in OC supporting platforms. Data was collected following a mixed-method approach. A cross-case analysis, including a correlation analysis of teachers’ motivations and their perception about different incentive mechanisms, suggests that there is a relationship between these factors. Teachers’ main motivation is to gain knowledge, and they perceive recommendation systems, tutorials, news sections and social features as the most interesting features to be implemented in an OC of teachers. In contrast, they consider reputation as the least important motivator, and they do not perceive features such as users’ rankings or contributors’ acknowledgement sections as important. These results contribute to the improvement of the supporting platforms for OC of teachers and the integration in teaching practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 87.50
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 49.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Disclosure of Interests

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

References

  1. Asensio-Pérez, J.I., et al.: Towards teaching as design: exploring the inter-play between full-lifecycle learning design tooling and Teacher Professional Development. Comput. Educ. 114, 92–116 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cho, H., Stefanone, M., & Gay, G.: Social information sharing in a CSCL community. In Computer Support for Collaborative Learning, pp. 43–50. Routledge (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Corbin, J., Strauss, A.: Basics of Qualitative Research: TECHNIQUES and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 4th edn. Sage publications, Thousands Oaks (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Creswell, J.W., Plano Clark, V.L.: Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. SAGE Publications, Thousands Oaks (2017). https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/designing-and-conducting-mixed-methods-research/book241842

  5. Cruz, C.C.P., Motta, C.L.R., Santoro, F.M., Elia, M.: Reputation model in communities of practice: a case study. In: 2008 12th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design, pp. 777–782 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/CSCWD.2008.4537077

  6. Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13(3), 319–340 (1989). https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M.: The «What» and «Why» of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol. Inq. 11(4), 227–268 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Duncan-Howell, J.: Teachers making connections: online communities as a source of professional learning. Br. J. Edu. Technol. 41(2), 324–340 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00953.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gutierrez-Paez, N., Santos, P., Hernández-Leo, D.: Understanding participants’ motivational factors for the design of a teacher community platform. In: 2021 International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), pp. 132–134 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT52272.2021.00047

  10. Gutiérrez-Páez, N.F., Santos, P., Hernández-Leo, D., Carrió, M.: Designing a pre-service teacher community platform: a focus on participants’ motivations. In: De Laet, T., Klemke, R., Alario-Hoyos, C., Hilliger, I., Ortega-Arranz, A. (eds.) EC-TEL 2021. LNCS, vol. 12884, pp. 352–357. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86436-1_34

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Hernández-Leo, D., et al.: An integrated environment for learning design. Front. ICT 5, 9 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3389/fict.2018.00009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hernández-Leo, D., Jorrín-Abellán, I.M., Villasclaras-Fernández, E.D., Asensio-Pérez, J.I., Dimitriadis, Y.: A multicase study for the evaluation of a pattern-based visual design process for collaborative learning. J. Vis. Lang. Comput. 21(6), 313–331 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvlc.2010.08.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hernández-Leo, D., Moreno, P., Chacón, J., Blat, J.: LdShake support for team-based learning design. Comput. Hum. Behav. 37, 402–412 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hew, K.F., Hara, N.: Empirical study of motivators and barriers of teacher online knowledge sharing. Educ. Tech. Res. Dev. 55(6), 573 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-007-9049-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hofer, S.I., Nistor, N., Scheibenzuber, C.: Online teaching and learning in higher education: lessons learned in crisis situations. Comput. Hum. Behav. 121, 106789 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hur, J.W., Brush, T.A.: Teacher participation in online. Communities 41(3), 279–303 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kirschner, P.A., Lai, K.W.: Online communities of practice in education. Technol. Pedagogy Educ. 16(2), 127–131 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/14759390701406737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Laurillard, D., Kennedy, E., Charlton, P., Wild, J., Dimakopoulos, D.: Using technology to develop teachers as designers of ℡: evaluating the learning designer. Br. J. Edu. Technol. 49(6), 1044–1058 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Macià, M., García, I.: Informal online communities and networks as a source of teacher professional development: a review. Teach. Teach. Educ. 55, 291–307 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.01.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Malinen, S.: Understanding user participation in online communities: a systematic literature review of empirical studies. Comput. Hum. Behav. 46, 228–238 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Marín, V.I., Asensio-Pérez, J.I., Villagrá-Sobrino, S., Hernández-Leo, D., García-Sastre, S.: Supporting online collaborative design for teacher professional development. Technol. Pedagogy Educ. 27(5), 571–587 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2018.1547787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Michos, K., Hernández-Leo, D.: Supporting awareness in communities of learning design practice. Comput. Hum. Behav. 85, 255–270 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Michos, K., Hernández-Leo, D.: CIDA: a collective inquiry framework to study and support teachers as designers in technological environments. Comput. Educ. 143, 103679 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mohammadi, F., Abrizah, A., Nazari, M., Attaran, M.: What motivates high school teachers to use web-based learning resources for classroom instruction? an exploratory case study in an Iranian smart school. Comput. Hum. Behav. 51, 373–381 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Muller, P.: Reputation, trust and the dynamics of leadership in communities of practice. J. Manag. Gover. 10(4), 381–400 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-006-9007-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Nov, O., Anderson, D., Arazy, O.: Volunteer computing: a model of the factors determining contribution to community-based scientific research. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 741–750 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1145/1772690.1772766

  27. Nov, O., Arazy, O., Anderson, D.: Technology-mediated citizen science participation: a motivational model. In: Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (2011). http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.366.3430

  28. Rodríguez-Triana, M.J., Prieto, L.P., Ley, T., de Jong, T., Gillet, D.: Social practices in teacher knowledge creation and innovation adoption: a large-scale study in an online instructional design community for inquiry learning. Int. J. Comput.-Support. Collab. Learn. 15(4), 445–467 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-020-09331-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Stake, R.E.: Multiple Case Study Analysis. Guilford press, New York (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sun, N., Rau, P.P.-L., Ma, L.: Understanding lurkers in online communities: a literature review. Comput. Hum. Behav. 38, 110–117 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tekkumru-Kisa, M., Schunn, C.: Integrating a space for teacher interaction into an educative curriculum: design principles and teachers’ use of the iPlan tool. Technol. Pedagogy Educ. 28(2), 133–155 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2019.1595707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tseng, F.-C., Kuo, F.-Y.: A study of social participation and knowledge sharing in the teachers’ online professional community of practice. Comput. Educ. 72, 37–47 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Vassileva, J.: Motivating participation in social computing applications: a user modeling perspective. User Model. User-Adap. Inter. 22(1), 177–201 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-011-9109-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zydney, J.M., deNoyelles, A., Kyeong-Ju Seo, K.: Creating a community of inquiry in online environments: an exploratory study on the effect of a protocol on interactions within asynchronous discussions. Comput. Educ. 58(1), 77–87 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by PID2020-112584RB-C33 funded by MCIN/AEI/https://doi.org/10.13039/501100011033, the Ramón y Cajal programme (P. Santos) and ICREA under the ICREA Academia programme (D. Hernández-Leo, Serra Hunter).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patricia Santos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Santos, P., Gutierrez-Paez, N., Hernández-Leo, D., Michos, K., Carrió, M. (2024). Motivational Dynamics and Platform Design in Online Communities of Teachers: A Multi-case Study. In: Santos, P., Álvarez, C., Hernández-Leo, D., Kobayashi, M., Zurita, G. (eds) Collaboration Technologies and Social Computing. CollabTech 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14890. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-67998-8_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-67998-8_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-67997-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-67998-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics