Abstract
Digital innovation has been advocated as bringing new opportunities to organizations. At the same time, here is still a gap of empirical research on the paths, i.e., choices in directions manifested over time, of digital innovation in public sector healthcare. In this study, we aim to fill this gap through analyzing a complete set of three years of centrally funded innovation projects in a large incumbent healthcare organization. Using a previously proposed framework combining the Resource Based View and Organizational Ambidexterity into a positioning of digital innovation opportunity, we investigate the paths of digital innovation. The findings show that the predominant path of digital innovation lies in exploitative innovation through utilizing internal and shared resources. In contrast with the literature the use of complementary assets in the form of external resources i.e., engaging customers and other external parties in value creation, is only found in one of the projects. We describe this as a case of path dependency, where the organization avoids tapping into some of the core opportunities in digital innovation. This is discussed in relation to the digital innovation literature and the future paths of digital innovation in public sector healthcare.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hanelt, A., Bohnsack, R., Marz, D., Marante, C.A.: A systematic review of the literature on digital transformation: insights and implications for strategy and organizational change. J Manag. Stud. 58, 1159–1197 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12639
Vial, G.: Understanding digital transformation: a review and a research agenda. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 28, 118–144 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003
Chanias, S., Myers, M.D., Hess, T.: Digital transformation strategy making in pre-digital organizations: the case of a financial services provider. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 28, 17–33 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2018.11.003
Norling, K., Lindroth, T., Magnusson, J., Torell, J.: Digital decoupling: a population study of digital transformation strategies in Swedish municipalities. In: Dg O 2022 23rd Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, pp. 356–363 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3543434.3543639
Lindroth, T., Magnusson, J., Norling, K., Torell, J.: Balancing the digital portfolio: empirical evidence of an ambidextrous bias in digital government. In: Dg O 2022 23rd Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, pp. 307–314 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3543434.3543641
Drechsler, K., Wagner, H.T., Gregory, R., et al.: At the crossroad between digital innovation and digital transformation.pdf. Communications of the Association for Information Systems (2020). https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.044XX
Hund, A., Wagner, H.-T., Beimborn, D., Weitzel, T.: Digital innovation: review and novel perspective. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 30, 101695 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2021.101695
Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., Lyytinen, K.: Research commentary—The new organizing logic of digital innovation: an agenda for information systems research. Inform. Syst. Res. 21, 724–735 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0322
Svahn, F., Mathiassen, L., University, G.S., Lindgren, R.: Embracing digital innovation in incumbent firms: how Volvo cars managed competing concerns. MIS Q. 41, 239–253 (2017). https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2017/41.1.12
Faulkner, P., Runde, J.: Theorizing the digital object1. MIS Q. 43, 1279–1302 (2019). https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2019/13136
Oberländer, A.M., Röglinger, M., Rosemann, M.: Digital opportunities for incumbents – a resource-centric perspective. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 30, 101670 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2021.101670
Magnusson, J., Koutsikouri, D., Päivärinta, T.: Efficiency creep and shadow innovation: enacting ambidextrous IT Governance in the public sector. Eur. J. Inform. Syst. 29, 329–349 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085x.2020.1740617
Xue, L.: How do industry environments moderate the effects of firms’ IT asset portfolios? MIS Q. 36, 509–528 (2012). https://doi.org/10.2307/41703465
Mithas, S., Rust, R.T.: How information technology strategy and investments influence firm performance. MIS Q. 40, 223–245 (2016). https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2016/40.1.10
Sheikh, A., et al.: Health information technology and digital innovation for national learning health and care systems. Lancet Digit. Heal. 3, e383–e396 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/s2589-7500(21)00005-4
Wimelius, H., Mathiassen, L., Holmström, J., Keil, M.: A paradoxical perspective on technology renewal in digital transformation. Inf. Syst. J. 31, 198–225 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12307
Bygstad, B.: Generative innovation: a comparison of lightweight and heavyweight IT. J. Inf. Technol. 32, 180–193 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2016.15
Jovanovic, K., et al.: Digital innovation hubs in health-care robotics fighting COVID-19. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 28, 40–47 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/mra.2020.3044965
Ozalp, H., Ozcan, P., Dinckol, D., Zachariadis, M., Gawer, A.: “Digital Colonization” of highly regulated industries: an analysis of big tech platforms’ entry into health care and education. Calif. Manag. Rev. 64, 78–107 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1177/00081256221094307
Eom, S.-J., Lee, J.: Digital government transformation in turbulent times: responses, challenges, and future direction. Gov. Inform. Q. 39, 101690 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101690
Hinings, B., Gegenhuber, T., Greenwood, R.: Digital innovation and transformation: an institutional perspective. Inf. Org. 28, 52–61 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.02.004
Lyytinen, K., Yoo, Y.,Boland Jr., R.J.: Digital product innovation within four classes of innovation networks. Inf. Syst. J. 26, 47–75 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12093
Bygstad, B., Øvrelid, E., Ludvigsen, S., Dæhlen, M.: From dual digitalization to digital learning space: exploring the digital transformation of higher education. Comput. Educ. 182, 104463 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104463
March, J.G.: Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Stud. Organ. (2009). https://doi.org/10.3280/so2008-002006
Birkinshaw, J., Zimmermann, A., Raisch, S.: How do firms adapt to discontinuous change? Bridging the dynamic capabilities and ambidexterity perspectives. Calif. Manag. Rev. 58, 36–58 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2016.58.4.36
Zimmermann, A., Raisch, S., Cardinal, L.B.: Managing persistent tensions on the frontline: a configurational perspective on ambidexterity. J. Manag. Stud. 55, 739–769 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12311
Wu, B., Wan, Z., Levinthal, D.A.: Complementary assets as pipes and prisms: innovation incentives and trajectory choices. Strat. Manag. J. 35, 1257–1278 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2159
Temiz, S.: Open innovation via crowdsourcing: a digital only hackathon case study from Sweden. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 7, 39 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010039
Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J., Bracken, C.C.: Content analysis in mass communication: assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Hum. Commun. Res. 28, 587–604 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00826.x
Priyono, A., Moin, A., Putri, V.N.A.O.: Identifying digital transformation paths in the business model of SMEs during the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Open Innov.: Technol. Mark. Complex. 6, 104 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6040104
Magnusson, J., Elliot, V., Hagberg, J.: Digital transformation: why companies resist what they need for sustained performance. J. Bus. Strat. 43, 316–322 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1108/jbs-02-2021-0018
Warner, K.S.R., Wäger, M.: Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation: an ongoing process of strategic renewal. Long Range Plann. 52, 326–349 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2018.12.001
Burau, V., Nissen, N., Terkildsen, M.D., Væggemose, U.: Personalised medicine and the state: a political discourse analysis. Heal. Polic. 125, 122–129 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.10.005
Casino, F., Dasaklis, T.K., Patsakis, C.: A systematic literature review of blockchain-based applications: current status, classification and open issues. Telemat. Inform. 36, 55–81 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.11.006
Dillard-Wright, J.: A radical imagination for nursing: generative insurrection, creative resistance. Nurs. Philos. 23, e12371 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.12371
Meyer, J.W., Rowan, B.: Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. Am. J. Sociol. 83, 340–363 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1086/226550
Amarantou, V., Kazakopoulou, S., Chatzoudes, D., Chatzoglou, P.: Resistance to change: an empirical investigation of its antecedents. J. Organ. Chang. Manag. 31, 426–450 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1108/jocm-05-2017-0196
Detert, J.R., Pollock, T.G.: Values, interests, and the capacity to act. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 44, 186–214 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886308314901
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Magnusson, J., Gajic, A., Isik, L., Nilsson, C. (2023). Exploring Digital Innovation Paths in Healthcare: The Case of a Large Swedish Healthcare Organization. In: Lindgren, I., et al. Electronic Government. EGOV 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14130. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41138-0_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41138-0_28
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-41137-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-41138-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)