[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

Analysis of CoI Presence Indicators in a Moodle Forum Using Unsupervised Learning Techniques

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Technologies and Innovation (CITI 2023)

Abstract

This paper presents a study that uses unsupervised machine learning techniques to analyse CoI presence indicators (Social Presence, Teacher Presence and Cognitive Presence) in a Moodle forum. The objective of this study is to identify the profiles of the participants using unsupervised learning algorithms that detect patterns and common characteristics among them. To accomplish this, a plugin was developed in the Moodle forum to enable the meta-annotation of CoI presence indicators. Following that, various unsupervised learning algorithms, including Hierarchical clustering, Canopy, Cobweb, simple K-means, and more, were evaluated to identify the most suitable algorithm for detecting similar characteristics among groups of users in terms of their participation and activity levels in the forum and the topics they are most interested in and participate. Utilizing K-means, it became possible to determine whether the identified groups reflected varying levels of participation and particular user characteristics. Acquiring an understanding of user engagement and behavioral patterns provides valuable insights into community dynamics and leads to the development of strategies that enhance the online learning experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 51.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 64.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://github.com/maguirre2017/clustering_COI.

References

  1. Akyol, Z., et al.: A response to the review of the community of inquiry framework. J. Distance Educ. 23(2), 123–135 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anggraeni, D.M., Sole, F.B.: E-Learning Moodle, Media Pembelajaran Fisika Abad 21. J. Penelit. dan Pengkaj. Ilmu Pendidik. e-Saintika 1, 2 (2018). https://doi.org/10.36312/e-saintika.v1i2.101

  3. Bandura, A.: Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 52(1), 1–26 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Chang-Tik, C.: An analysis of discipline and personality in blended environments: do they interact differently in the teaching, cognitive, and social presences? Can. J. Learn. Technol. 46(1), 1–19 (2020). https://doi.org/10.21432/cjlt27883

  5. Chen, Y., et al.: Discovering MOOC learner motivation and its moderating role. Behav. Inf. Technol. 39(12), 1257–1275 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2019.1661520

  6. Dhika, H., et al.: Ease evaluation using the best moodle learning management system with data mining concepts. 944–952 (2020). https://doi.org/10.2991/ASSEHR.K.200129.117

  7. Fauszt, T., et al.: Increasing the prediction power of Moodle machine learning models with self. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. 16(24), 23–39 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Geng, S., et al.: Investigating self-directed learning and technology readiness in blending learning environment. Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ. 16, 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0147-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim, G., Gurvitch, R.: Online education research adopting the community of inquiry framework: a systematic review. 72(4), 395–409 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2020.1761843

  10. Mohd Radzi, S.F., et al.: Comparison of classification algorithms for predicting autistic spectrum disorder using WEKA modeler. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 22(1), 1–15 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-02050-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nalli, G., et al.: Application of machine learning to the learning analytics of the Moodle platform to create heterogeneous groups in on-line courses. Ital. J. Educ. Res. 156–173 (2019). https://doi.org/10.7346/SIRD-2S2019-P158

  12. Purwoningsih, T., et al.: Online learners’ behaviors detection using exploratory data analysis and machine learning approach. In: Proceeding of 2019 4th International Conference on Informatics Computer ICIC 2019 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIC47613.2019.8985918

  13. Rivas, A., et al.: Students performance analysis based on machine learning techniques. Commun. Comput. Inf. Sci. 1011, 428–438 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20798-4_37/COVER

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Santos, O.C., Boticario, J.G.: Supporting a collaborative task in a web-based learning environment with Artificial Intelligence and User Modelling techniques. Informática Educ. nuevos retos, 2004, ISBN 84–7723–653–4. 71 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sha, L., et al.: Assessing Algorithmic Fairness in Automatic Classifiers of Educational Forum Posts. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. (including Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinformatics). 12748 LNAI, 381–394 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78292-4_31/COVER

  16. Vásquez-Bermúdez, M., et al.: Effectiveness of monitoring indicators in the architecture of a collaborative system. Commun. Comput. Inf. Sci. 1658(CCIS), 191–202 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19961-5_14/COVER

  17. Wertz, R.E.H.: Learning presence within the Community of Inquiry framework: an alternative measurement survey for a four-factor model. Internet High. Educ. 52, 100832 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IHEDUC.2021.100832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yanacón-Atía, D., et al.: Indicadores colaborativos individuales y grupales para Moodle Individual and group collaborative indicators for Moodle (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mitchell Vásquez-Bermúdez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Vásquez-Bermúdez, M., Aguirre-Munizaga, M., Hidalgo-Larrea, J. (2023). Analysis of CoI Presence Indicators in a Moodle Forum Using Unsupervised Learning Techniques. In: Valencia-García, R., Bucaram-Leverone, M., Del Cioppo-Morstadt, J., Vera-Lucio, N., Centanaro-Quiroz, P.H. (eds) Technologies and Innovation. CITI 2023. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1873. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45682-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45682-4_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-45681-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-45682-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics