[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

Automating the Analysis of Institutional Design in International Agreements

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Science – ICCS 2023 (ICCS 2023)

Abstract

This paper explores the automatic knowledge extraction of formal institutional design - norms, rules, and actors - from international agreements. The focus was to analyze the relationship between the visibility and centrality of actors in the formal institutional design in regulating critical aspects of cultural heritage relations. The developed tool utilizes techniques such as collecting legal documents, annotating them with Institutional Grammar, and using graph analysis to explore the formal institutional design. The system was tested against the 2003 UNESCO Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 71.50
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 89.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://s.ntnu.no/ig-parser-visual.

  2. 2.

    The source code of our analysis: https://github.com/institutional-grammar-pl.

  3. 3.

    The expert is Hanna Schreiber.

  4. 4.

    The model is used in the tagger’s repository (https://github.com/institutional-grammar-pl/ig-tagger) and the experiments are included in a separate repository: https://github.com/institutional-grammar-pl/sentence-types.

References

  1. Aksoy, S.G., Joslyn, C., Ortiz Marrero, C., Praggastis, B., Purvine, E.: Hypernetwork science via high-order hypergraph walks. EPJ Data Sci. 9(1), 1–34 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-020-00231-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bauer, M.W., Ege, J.: Bureaucratic autonomy of international organizations’ secretariats. J. Eur. Public Policy 23(7), 1019–1037 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Blake, J., Lixinski, L.: The 2003 UNESCO Intangible Heritage Convention: A Commentary. Oxford University Press, Cambridge (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Celardo, L., Everett, M.G.: Network text analysis: a two-way classification approach. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 51, 102009 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dai, H., Tang, S., Wu, F., Zhuang, Y.: Entity mention aware document representation. Inf. Sci. 430, 216–227 (2017)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Eckhard, S., Ege, J.: International bureaucracies and their influence on policy-making: a review of empirical evidence. J. Eur. Public Policy 23(7), 960–978 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Frantz, C.K., Siddiki, S.: Institutional grammar 2.0: a specification for encoding and analyzing institutional design. Public Adm. 99(2), 222–247 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ghorbani, A., Siddiki, S., Mesdaghi, B., Bosch, M., Abebe, Y.: Institutional compliance in flood risk management: a network analysis approach (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Heikkila, T., Weible, C.M.: A semiautomated approach to analyzing polycentricity. Environ. Policy Govern. 28(4), 308–318 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jörgens, H., Kolleck, N., Saerbeck, B.: Exploring the hidden influence of international treaty secretariats: using social network analysis to analyse the Twitter debate on the ‘Lima Work Programme on Gender’. J. Eur. Public Policy 23(7), 979–998 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Libal, T.: A meta-level annotation language for legal texts. In: Dastani, M., Dong, H., van der Torre, L. (eds.) CLAR 2020. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 12061, pp. 131–150. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44638-3_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu, B.: Social Network Analysis, pp. 269–309. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lüschow, A.: Application of graph theory in the library domain-building a faceted framework based on a literature review. J. Libr. Inf. Sci 54(4), 558–577 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Majeed, A., Rauf, I.: Graph theory: a comprehensive survey about graph theory applications in computer science and social networks. Inventions 5(1), 10 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mesdaghi, B., Ghorbani, A., de Bruijne, M.: Institutional dependencies in climate adaptation of transport infrastructures: an institutional network analysis approach. Environ. Sci. Policy 127, 120–136 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nickel, M., Murphy, K., Tresp, V., Gabrilovich, E.: A review of relational machine learning for knowledge graphs. Proc. IEEE 104(1), 11–33 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Olivier, T., Scott, T.A., Schlager, E.: Institutional design and complexity: protocol network structure in response to different collective-action dilemmas. In: Fischer, M., Ingold, K. (eds.) Networks in Water Governance. PSWGPP, pp. 267–293. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46769-2_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Olivier, T.: How do institutions address collective-action problems? bridging and bonding in institutional design. Polit. Res. Q. 72(1), 162–176 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Olivier, T., Schlager, E.: Rules and the ruled: understanding joint patterns of institutional design and behavior in complex governing arrangements. Policy Stud. J. 50(2), 340–365 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Paranyushkin, D.: Infranodus: generating insight using text network analysis. In: The World Wide Web Conference, WWW 2019, p. 3584–3589. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Qi, P., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y., Bolton, J., Manning, C.D.: Stanza: a python natural language processing toolkit for many human languages. In: ACL: System Demonstrations, pp. 101–108. ACL (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rice, D., Siddiki, S., Frey, S., Kwon, J.H., Sawyer, A.: Machine coding of policy texts with the institutional grammar. Public Adm. 99, 248–262 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Schreiber, H.: Intangible cultural heritage and soft power - exploring the relationship. Int. J. Intangible Herit. 12, 44–57 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Spyropoulos, T.S., Andras, C., Dimkou, A.: Application of graph theory to entrepreneurship research: new findings and a new methodology framework. KnE Social Sci. 5(9), 139–156 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wichrowska, A.E., Saputa, K.: System of a full-text database of legislative documents and information created during the COVID-19 pandemic with a module for detection of IG objects (2021). https://repo.pw.edu.pl/info/bachelor/WUTea29ae51c3164edcba3d5016e9d38e9e/

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research was funded by the Centre for Priority Research Area Artificial Intelligence and Robotics of Warsaw University of Technology within the Excellence Initiative: Research University (IDUB) program (grant no 1820/27/Z01/ POB2/2021), by the Faculty of Mathematics and Information Science, and also by the European Union under the Horizon Europe grant OMINO (grant no 101086321).

Hanna Schreiber and Bartosz Pieliński wish to acknowledge that their contribution to this paper was carried out within the framework of the research grant Sonata 15, “Between the heritage of the world and the heritage of humanity: researching international heritage regimes through the prism of Elinor Ostrom’s IAD framework," 2019/35/D/HS5/04247 financed by the National Science Centre (Poland).

We want to thank many Students for their work under the guidance of Anna Wróblewska and Bartosz Pieliński on Institutional Grammar taggers and preliminary ideas of the system (e.g. [25]), which we modified and extended further.

We also thank the anonymous reviewers and the program committee for their helpful comments.

(Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Research Executive Agency. Neither the European Union nor European Research Executive Agency can be held responsible for them.)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Anna Wróblewska or Bartosz Pieliński .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Wróblewska, A. et al. (2023). Automating the Analysis of Institutional Design in International Agreements. In: Mikyška, J., de Mulatier, C., Paszynski, M., Krzhizhanovskaya, V.V., Dongarra, J.J., Sloot, P.M. (eds) Computational Science – ICCS 2023. ICCS 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14075. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36024-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36024-4_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-36023-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-36024-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics