[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

An Agent-Based Model of UK Farmers’ Decision-Making on Adoption of Agri-environment Schemes

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Social Simulation (ESSA 2022)

Abstract

Agri-environment schemes (AES) are government-funded voluntary programs that incentivise farmers and land managers for environmental friendly farming practices. Understanding farmers’ decision-making process and its impact on AES adoption can aid policy makers in designing AES schemes that meet adoption goals and environmental targets. Farmers’ decision-making is complex and involves a range of social, behavioural, economic and ecological factors. In this paper, we present a spatially explicit agent-based model (ABM)—BESTMAP-ABM-UK that simulates farmers’ decision-making process, inclusive of farmers’ social, behavioural and economic factors, on adopting buffer strips, cover crops, grassland management and arable land conversion to grassland schemes in the UK. The model produces farmers’ AES adoption under varied AES scheme designs in term of the contract length, the offered payment level, the bureaucracy level and the required minimal area. We apply the Morris screening method to analyse the importance of the model parameters in a status quo scenario, in which current UK AES designs are used. The results show that the average accepted payments of farmers for buffer strips and grassland management and farmers’ intrinsic openness to buffer strips have the most significant impact on the farm adoption rate in the model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 143.50
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 179.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
GBP 179.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.gov.uk/countryside-stewardship-grants.

  2. 2.

    https://naturalengland-defra.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/Defra::countryside-stewardship-scheme-agreements-england/about.

  3. 3.

    https://eip.ceh.ac.uk/naturalengland-ncmaps/reportsData.

References

  1. Uthes, S., Matzdorf, B.: Studies on agri-environmental measures: a survey of the literature. Environ. Manage. 51, 251–266 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-012-9959-6

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lastra-Bravo, X.B., Hubbard, C., Garrod, G., Tolón-Becerra, A.: What drives farmers’ participation in EU agri-environmental schemes?: results from a qualitative meta-analysis. Environ. Sci. Policy 54, 1–9 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.06.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pavlis, E.S., Terkenli, T.S., Kristensen, S.B.P., Busck, A.G., Cosor, G.L.: Patterns of agri-environmental scheme participation in Europe: indicative trends from selected case studies. Land Use Policy 57, 800–812 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.09.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wilson, G.A., Hart, K.: Financial imperative or conservation concern? EU farmers’ motivations for participation in voluntary agri-environmental schemes. Environ. Plan. A 32, 2161–2185 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1068/a3311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zimmermann, A., Britz, W.: European farms’ participation in agri-environmental measures. Land Use Policy 50, 214–228 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.09.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Siebert, R., Toogood, M., Knierim, A.: Factors affecting European farmers’ participation in biodiversity policies. Sociol. Ruralis 46, 318–340 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2006.00420.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ruto, E., Garrod, G.: Investigating farmers’ preferences for the design of agri-environment schemes: a choice experiment approach. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 52, 631–647 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560902958172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hynes, S., Garvey, E.: Modelling farmers’ participation in an agri-environmental scheme using panel data: an application to the rural environment protection scheme in Ireland. J. Agric. Econ. 60, 546–562 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2009.00210.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tyllianakis, E., Martin-Ortega, J.: Agri-environmental schemes for biodiversity and environmental protection: how we are not yet “hitting the right keys.” Land Use Policy 109, 105620 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LANDUSEPOL.2021.105620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Coyne, L., Kendall, H., Hansda, R., Reed, M.S., Williams, D.J.L.: Identifying economic and societal drivers of engagement in agri-environmental schemes for English dairy producers. Land Use Policy 101, 105174 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LANDUSEPOL.2020.105174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Defrancesco, E., Gatto, P., Mozzato, D.: To leave or not to leave? Understanding determinants of farmers’ choices to remain in or abandon agri-environmental schemes. Land Use Policy 76, 460–470 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.02.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Espinosa-Goded, M., Barreiro-Hurlé, J., Ruto, E.: What do farmers want from agri-environmental scheme design? A choice experiment approach. J. Agric. Econ. 61, 259–273 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1477-9552.2010.00244.X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Capitanio, F., Adinolfi, F., Malorgio, G.: What explains farmers’ participation in rural development policy in Italian southern region? An empirical analysis. New Medit. 10, 19–24 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mazorra, A.P.: Agri-environmental policy in Spain. The agenda of socio-political developments at the national, regional and local levels. J. Rural Stud. 17, 81–97 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167(00)00028-0

  15. Peerlings, J., Polman, N.: Farm choice between agri-environmental contracts in the European Union. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 52, 593–612 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560902958131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mora-herrera, D.Y., Huerta-barrientos, A.: A review of agent-based modeling for simulation of agricultural Una revisión de modelación basada en agentes para la simulación de sistemas agropecuarios. 88, 103–110 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schreinemachers, P., Berger, T.: An agent-based simulation model of human-environment interactions in agricultural systems. Environ. Model. Softw. 26, 845–859 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.02.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Brady, M., Sahrbacher, C., Kellermann, K., Happe, K.: An agent-based approach to modeling impacts of agricultural policy on land use, biodiversity and ecosystem services. Landsc. Ecol. 27, 1363–1381 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-012-9787-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Swinscoe, T.H.A., Knoeri, C., Fleskens, L., Barrett, J.: Agent-based modelling of agricultural water abstraction in response to climate change and policies: In East Anglia, UK (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Matthews, R.B., Gilbert, N.G., Roach, A., Polhill, J.G., Gotts, N.M.: Agent-based land-use models: a review of applications. Landsc. Ecol. 22, 1447–1459 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-007-9135-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kremmydas, D., Athanasiadis, I.N., Rozakis, S.: A review of agent based modeling for agricultural policy evaluation. Agric. Syst. 164, 95–106 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2018.03.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Louhichi, K., Espinosa, M., Ciaian, P., Perni, A., Vosough Ahmadi, B., Colen, L., Gomez y Paloma, S.: The EU-wide individual farm model for common agricultural policy analysis (IFM-CAP v. 1). Economic impacts of CAP greening https://doi.org/10.2760/218047 (2018)

  23. Huber, R., Bakker, M., Balmann, A., Berger, T., Bithell, M., Brown, C., Grêt-Regamey, A., Xiong, H., Le, Q.B., Mack, G., Meyfroidt, P., Millington, J., Müller, B., Polhill, J.G., Sun, Z., Seidl, R., Troost, C., Finger, R.: Representation of decision-making in European agricultural agent-based models. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2018.09.007 (2018)

  24. Ziv, G., Beckmann, M., Bullock, J., Cord, A., Delzeit, R., Domingo, C., Dreßler, G., Hagemann, N., Masó, J., Müller, B., Neteler, M., Sapundzhieva, A., Stoev, P., Stenning, J., Trajković, M., Václavík, T.: BESTMAP: behavioural, ecological and socio-economic tools for modelling agricultural policy. Res. Ideas Outcomes. 6, 1–48 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.6.e52052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wittstock, F., Hötten, D., Biffi, S., Domingo-marimon, C., Bořivoj Šarapatka, M.B., Mesaroš, M.: Summaries of data, obstacles and challenges from interview campaigns (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Grutters, J.P.C., Kessels, A.G.H., Dirksen, C.D., Van Helvoort-Postulart, D., Anteunis, L.J.C., Joore, M.A.: Willingness to accept versus willingness to pay in a discrete choice experiment. Value Health 11, 1110–1119 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00340.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wilensky, U.: NetLogo. Northweste (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Salecker, J., Sciaini, M., Meyer, K.M., Wiegand, K.: The nlrx r package: a next-generation framework for reproducible NetLogo model analyses (2019). https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13286

  29. Morris, M.D.: Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments. Technometrics 33, 161–174 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1177/001872086700900503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Campolongo, F., Cariboni, J., Saltelli, A.: An effective screening design for sensitivity analysis of large models. Environ. Model. Softw. 22, 1509–1518 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2006.10.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Campolongo, F., Ratto, M.: Sensitivity Analysis in Practice: A Guide to Assessing Scientific Models (Google eBook) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chunhui Li .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Li, C. et al. (2023). An Agent-Based Model of UK Farmers’ Decision-Making on Adoption of Agri-environment Schemes. In: Squazzoni, F. (eds) Advances in Social Simulation. ESSA 2022. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34920-1_37

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics