CryptoKitties vs. Axie Infinity: Computational Analysis of NFT Game Reddit Discussions

1. Aletras, N., Stevenson, M.: Evaluating topic coherence using distributional semantics. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computational Semantics (IWCS 2013)-Long Papers, pp. 13–22 (2013)

   Google Scholar 

2. Atiles, J.: Introduction: decoding crypto-paradisesfraud crypto-colonialism, climate crisis, and dispossession in the global south. S. Atlantic Q. 594–599 (2022)

   Google Scholar 

3. Blei, D.M., Ng, A.Y., Jordan, M.I.: Latent dirichlet allocation. In: NIPS’02, pp. 601–608 (2002)

   Google Scholar 

4. Cooper, H.E., Camic, P.M., Long, D.L., Panter, A., Rindskopf, D.E., Sher, K.J.: APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol 1: Foundations, planning, measures, and psychometrics. American Psychological Association (2012)

   Google Scholar 

5. Crandall, J.: Blockchains and the “chains of empire’’: contextualizing blockchain, cryptocurrency, and neoliberalism in puerto rico. Des. Cult. 11(3), 279–300 (2019)

   Google Scholar 

6. Dapper Labs: CryptoKitties (2017)

   Google Scholar 

7. De Jesus, S.B., Austria, D., Marcelo, D.R., Ocampo, C., Tibudan, A.J., Tus, J.: Play-to-earn: a qualitative analysis of the experiences and challenges faced by axie infinity online gamers amidst the covid-19 pandemic. Int. J. Psychol. Couns. 12(1), 291–424 (2002)

   Google Scholar 

8. Fairfield, J.: Tokenized: the law of non-fungible tokens and unique digital property. Indiana Law J. (2021)

   Google Scholar 

9. Fowler, A., Pirker, J.: Tokenfication-the potential of non-fungible tokens (NFT) for game development. In: Extended Abstracts of the 2021 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play, pp. 152–157 (2021)

   Google Scholar 

10. Francisco, R.D., Rodelas, N.C., Ubaldo, J.E.T.: The perception of filipinos on the advent of cryptocurrency and non-fungible token (NFT) games. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Res. 6, 1005–1018 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

11. Fujiki, H.: Crypto asset ownership, financial literacy, and investment experience. Appl. Econ. 53(39), 4560–4581 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

12. Heeks, R.: Understanding “gold farming” and real-money trading as the intersection of real and virtual economies. J. Virtual Worlds Res. 2(4) (2009)

    Google Scholar 

13. Howson, P.: Climate crises and crypto-colonialism: conjuring value on the blockchain frontiers of the global south. Front. Blockchain 3, 22 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

14. Jaffe, A.B.: Understanding game balance with quantitative methods. Ph.D. thesis, University of Washington (2013)

    Google Scholar 

15. Kshetri, N.: Policy, ethical, social, and environmental considerations of web3 and the metaverse. IT Prof. 24(3), 4–8 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

16. Lu, C., Hassan, L., Nummenmaa, T., Peltonen, J., et al.: “Switch” up your exercise: an empirical analysis of online user discussion of the ring fit adventure exergame. In: Proceedings of GamiFIN 2021, 5th International GamiFIN conference (2021)

    Google Scholar 

17. Lu, C., Li, X., Nummenmaa, T., Zhang, Z., Peltonen, J.: Patches and player community perceptions: Analysis of no man’s sky steam reviews. In: Proceedings of the 2020 DiGRA International Conference. DiGRA (2020)

    Google Scholar 

18. Min, T., Wang, H., Guo, Y., Cai, W.: Blockchain games: a survey. In: 2019 IEEE Conference on Games (CoG), pp. 1–8. IEEE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

19. Nardi, B., Kow, Y.M.: Digital imaginaries: how we know what we (think we) know about Chinese gold farming. First Monday (2010)

    Google Scholar 

20. Penttinen, E., Halme, M., Malo, P., Saarinen, T., Vilén, V.M.: Playing for fun or for profit: how extrinsically-motivated and intrinsically-motivated players make the choice between competing dual-purposed gaming platforms. Electron. Mark. 29(3), 337–358 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

21. Popescu, A.D.: Non-fungible tokens (NFT)-innovation beyond the craze. In: 5th International Conference on Innovation in Business, Economics and Marketing Research (2021)

    Google Scholar 

22. Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Airoldi, E.M.: A model of text for experimentation in the social sciences. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 111(515), 988–1003 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

23. Rosales, A.: Unveiling the power behind cryptocurrency mining in venezuela: a fragile energy infrastructure and precarious labor. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 79, 102167 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

24. Scholten, O.J., Hughes, N.G.J., Deterding, S., Drachen, A., Walker, J.A., Zendle, D.: Ethereum crypto-games: mechanics, prevalence, and gambling similarities. In: Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play, pp. 379–389 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

25. Serada, A.: Cryptomarkets gamified: what can we learn by playing cryptokitties? In: Proceedings of the 2020 DiGRA International Conference. DiGRA (2020)

    Google Scholar 

26. Serada, A.: Why is cryptokitties (not) gambling? In: International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games, pp. 1–4 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

27. Serada, A., Sihvonen, T., Harviainen, J.T.: Cryptokitties and the new ludic economy: how blockchain introduces value, ownership, and scarcity in digital gaming. Games Cult. 16(4), 457–480 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

28. Sky Mavis: Axie Infinity (2018)

    Google Scholar 

29. Tondello, G.F., Wehbe, R.R., Toups, Z.O., Nacke, L.E., Crenshaw, N.K.: Understanding player attitudes towards digital game objects. In: Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play, pp. 709–714 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

30. Wizards of the Coast: Dungeons & Dragons (1997)

    Google Scholar 

Download references